Bitcoin Forum
June 17, 2024, 06:40:45 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Ethereum Hard Fork Test Goes Awry, “No Constantinople In 2018“  (Read 537 times)
badbart (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 449
Merit: 24


View Profile
October 14, 2018, 02:00:29 PM
 #1

Looks like Constantinople test failed, block reward reduction put of until 2019. 

https://ethereumworldnews.com/ethereum-hard-fork-test-goes-awry-no-constantinople-in-2018-developer-says/
Awesomus Maximus
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 66


View Profile
October 14, 2018, 02:16:11 PM
 #2

I can't make up my mind if this is a good news or a bad news. Ethereum has to do something with their block reward and other bad solutions currently in place, but they had better do something that actually works. They don't need another disaster solution that doesn't work. I also can't shake off the feeling that they just promise and do nothing. All their improvements and development is being postponed one year after another. 
d57heinz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1453
Merit: 1011


Bitcoin Talks Bullshit Walks


View Profile
October 14, 2018, 03:39:39 PM
 #3

They couldn’t find a miner to support the reduction in block reward.  What I bet happens is Ethereum ends up having to hard fork away to get these changes implemented.  Miners will stick to the chain they on now because they don’t want to see a reduction in profits. Problem Is those propping the coin up are the ones wanting the reduction.  Stuck between rock and hard place I’d say.  Quite the conundrum. End result will be loss in mining rewards in terms of usd no matter what they decide.  I’d say pow mining has some major issues that need addressed.  Maybe it’s not a viable way to secure a blockchain.  Greed if left unchecked becomes cancerous in nature.  If that is what is to happen to crypto then so be it.  just be ready for it is all I ask

BR

As in nature, all is ebb and tide, all is wave motion, so it seems that in all branches of industry, alternating currents - electric wave motion - will have the sway. ~Nikola Tesla~
lulucorn
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12
Merit: 2


View Profile
October 14, 2018, 09:41:43 PM
 #4

They couldn’t find a miner to support the reduction in block reward.  What I bet happens is Ethereum ends up having to hard fork away to get these changes implemented.  Miners will stick to the chain they on now because they don’t want to see a reduction in profits. Problem Is those propping the coin up are the ones wanting the reduction.  Stuck between rock and hard place I’d say.  Quite the conundrum. End result will be loss in mining rewards in terms of usd no matter what they decide.  I’d say pow mining has some major issues that need addressed.  Maybe it’s not a viable way to secure a blockchain.  Greed if left unchecked becomes cancerous in nature.  If that is what is to happen to crypto then so be it.  just be ready for it is all I ask

BR

Hmm. Maybe if devs gave even a single fuck about... decentralization and ASIC resistance then maybeeeee miners would have helped out on testnet.

But nope

"ASIC resistance - Do we even care about that" Actual quote from dev meeting. Obviously miners are the fault here and not the devs despite what whitepaper says /s

Marvell2
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 132


View Profile
October 15, 2018, 06:15:39 AM
 #5

They couldn’t find a miner to support the reduction in block reward.  What I bet happens is Ethereum ends up having to hard fork away to get these changes implemented.  Miners will stick to the chain they on now because they don’t want to see a reduction in profits. Problem Is those propping the coin up are the ones wanting the reduction.  Stuck between rock and hard place I’d say.  Quite the conundrum. End result will be loss in mining rewards in terms of usd no matter what they decide.  I’d say pow mining has some major issues that need addressed.  Maybe it’s not a viable way to secure a blockchain.  Greed if left unchecked becomes cancerous in nature.  If that is what is to happen to crypto then so be it.  just be ready for it is all I ask

BR

Hmm. Maybe if devs gave even a single fuck about... decentralization and ASIC resistance then maybeeeee miners would have helped out on testnet.

But nope

"ASIC resistance - Do we even care about that" Actual quote from dev meeting. Obviously miners are the fault here and not the devs despite what whitepaper says /s


It will be cool if miners say fuck you to the devs and refuse to fork, it probably won’t happen but its a huge risk I have a feeling these cowardly devs don’t have the ball to risk , thus the delay lol
melpheos
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 557
Merit: 5


View Profile
October 15, 2018, 07:59:08 AM
 #6

With a block reduction reward only the big mine with sub 5c electricity will still mine.
Goodbye decentralization
Agozyen
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 252

Until the end


View Profile
October 15, 2018, 11:41:49 AM
 #7

Looks like Constantinople test failed, block reward reduction put of until 2019. 

https://ethereumworldnews.com/ethereum-hard-fork-test-goes-awry-no-constantinople-in-2018-developer-says/
'

Good news in the short term for GPU's, but this is just putting of the inevitable.  The bigger something gets the more centralized it becomes.  You'd think it would be the other way around. 
Intristing
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 227
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 15, 2018, 12:20:22 PM
 #8

Looks like Constantinople test failed, block reward reduction put of until 2019. 

https://ethereumworldnews.com/ethereum-hard-fork-test-goes-awry-no-constantinople-in-2018-developer-says/
'

Good news in the short term for GPU's, but this is just putting of the inevitable.  The bigger something gets the more centralized it becomes.  You'd think it would be the other way around. 

At least my 1080Ti can break even now with my electricity price.
Privatoria
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 352
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 17, 2018, 12:02:00 AM
 #9

In the second half of 2018, more and more bad news about Ethereum appears every day. Most of them are related to the influence of competitors. It seems to me that the appearance of an error in the test network is the norm and you should not give it much importance.
astraleureka
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 236
Merit: 16


View Profile
October 17, 2018, 03:37:27 AM
 #10

That is the entire point of a test network, after all Smiley
Metroid
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 353


Xtreme Monster


View Profile
October 17, 2018, 09:33:15 AM
 #11

People should look this as a good news cause the point of a test result must be absolute.

BTC Address: 1DH4ok85VdFAe47fSVXNVctxkFhUv4ujbR
1234msi
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 17, 2018, 12:16:41 PM
 #12

Does this mean that they will now have to implement progpow before Constantinople?
Q_R_V
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 428
Merit: 250


Inactivity: 8963


View Profile
October 17, 2018, 01:23:24 PM
 #13

This mean they will implement nothing at all.
dagarair
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 847
Merit: 383



View Profile WWW
October 17, 2018, 02:08:18 PM
 #14

This mean they will implement nothing at all.

Yep I think you are right, well for the near future say 6 months or so.

4MW Data Center - I BUILT Tongue  - Full story below:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4789787.msg43227027#msg43227027
vuli1
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 3


View Profile WWW
October 17, 2018, 04:45:06 PM
 #15

this will cost ETH token a lot. It a shame..

★ PRiVCY ➢ Own Your Privacy! ➢ Best privacy crypto-market! ★
✈✈✈[PoW/PoS]✅[Tor]✅[Airdrop]✈✈✈ (https://privcy.io/)
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!