No matter how successful a bounty project is......

[Mike Mayor]

You should not really blame the bounty. You need to have a look at the stakes and the number of tokens or coins they are paying and work out for yourself whether it is worth it or not. Sometimes it is clear it is worth it and you get very few $$ worth of tokens per stake. In these cases save your time and skip that particular bounty. Otherwise, you just waste so much of your time and get paid peanuts. Be responsible for your own time.

[Sexaphiliac]

This is a major issue that dissuades me from many bounty campaigns. Whenever a campaign seems like one with potential, the influx of population makes the rewards practically worthless. That's why I have a preference for campaigns that usually have fixed allocations per entry, that way you know what you're getting for your effort.

[miningguru]

Bounty program always be required plenty of participant because more participants means good chance to get more investors to invest at the projects and regarding bounty rewards price i think it depend on the price when listed on the exchange itself because if the price dumped after listed then limited participants could be useless because eventually the payment will be far to decent

Till now I don't such high payments because once after listing on the exchange, we don't see any value to the coin and after distribution, it is impossible for us to sell them in the market. Even after working for more than 3 months, which we don't see any value and this makes us think negatively about the ICO projects.

[LouVandetta]

The more the merrier, I guess. Oof

The majority of bounties didn't put a limit of how much participants could join their campaign. Why would they? The more people advertising their project, it means more people know of the project out there. Even when the bounty rewards pool was not that big either.

We once have had quite of bounties with the rewards worth of millions dollar . The good ol' days, and with limited participants.
No idea how's the way bounty works currently, but there must be one or more managers that use a limited participants for their bounty.

[rudin123]

I already expierenced it many times and i cant do anything but rather to accept it. After the calculation of stakes ,spreadsheet is forwarded to distribution team and after a week bounty pool decrease thats why bounty hunters gets mad.

I am not surprised if the allocation is reduced, I also experience the same thing about reducing the allocation when there will be a token delivery but what else can we do as well because it is for the good of their tokens as well.

[ereborltc]

There are a lot of people participating in the bounty activities of the same project, which is one thing the team likes to see. Its publicity has been reached, and its value can be more mentioned in the price of the token, which is a good thing.

[sayaya17]

If the bounty project gives a gift that is too small, it should really be considered before joining the project, especially if there are already many participants. We recommend that before joining we must see a spreadsheet how many participants have joined, because if there are too many then the allocation will be less for each participant. This should be a consideration for participant.

[onyek16M]

No matter how successful bounty project is, if participants are way too much and the bounty campaign has no limits you will all get too low rewards, this is where many are confused and complains that they only get 10$ from bounty after weeks of working, apart from price dumps this is another thing you should set your eye on.

Assuming a bounty pool worth 100k and thousands are waiting to get their shares please learn to use calculator sometimes, no matter how long the weeks are what you will get will be unsatisfying already.

yes this is affect from successfull bounty. ussually, bounty hunter after see the successfull bounty they as soon as possible to flocked join and makes reward with little paid. i think we can not to do anymore, but when bounty such happen in 2017 i think it worth it
because this case happen in this year who the bounty not legit yet. i think join in the bounty not worth it yet.

[Kvalentine]

It's not always about how many participants join a bounty project, if the project is crappy the result will be crappy, for example many bounty hunters promoted tokoin bounty and telegram participants still manages to earn 100$, quality of a project is what matters

[aioc]

No matter how successful bounty project is, if participants are way too much and the bounty campaign has no limits you will all get too low rewards, this is where many are confused and complains that they only get 10$ from bounty after weeks of working, apart from price dumps this is another thing you should set your eye on.

Assuming a bounty pool worth 100k and thousands are waiting to get their shares please learn to use calculator sometimes, no matter how long the weeks are what you will get will be unsatisfying already.

I have experienced that in so many ICO campaigns that I've participated in,  one of the reasons why participants are receiving very low rewards commensurate to their works is they are not limiting participants, there were a lot of campaigns that I'm in where checking before the start of the campaign, we are just a few not even reaching 100 participants, but before the end of the campaign I've checked it and we are over 800 participants.

[boris singer]

It's not always about how many participants join a bounty project, if the project is crappy the result will be crappy, for example many bounty hunters promoted tokoin bounty and telegram participants still manages to earn 100$, quality of a project is what matters

the main focus now is how to involve as many public investors and campaigns as possible. Hunters have been very reactive in responding to past experiences, and are very careful in analyzing and participating in campaigns. Theories about getting a lower share of distribution for reasons of the number of participants can no longer be expected.

[TinaK]

Successful bounty projects are lead by the good manager and team also am properly respond to you for the all queries. Mostly they will not postpone any plan what they have in their road-map.
So simply watch the project with these idea and I am sure you can able to pick the right bounties to make returns.

[smyslov]

Successful bounty projects are lead by the good manager and team also am properly respond to you for the all queries. Mostly they will not postpone any plan what they have in their road-map.
So simply watch the project with these idea and I am sure you can able to pick the right bounties to make returns.

One of the problem of a legit bounty campaign are the too many bounty hunters participating in the campaign, they are not limiting, the participants so after the campaign, campaign participants ended up not getting what they expected to gain, I have one campaign that I expected to receive at least $200 but ended up getting only $25 after so many months of campaign.

[Rodeo02]

It's not always about how many participants join a bounty project, if the project is crappy the result will be crappy, for example many bounty hunters promoted tokoin bounty and telegram participants still manages to earn 100$, quality of a project is what matters

The quality will be good hint if you will recieve a good amount of bounty ,but the harder to do now is how to find a good quality project. because more of them now is want to have money and do not want to create a good project, and this is biggest problem of many member here that always participate in a bounty. More them recieve less than what they are expected and sometimes nothing .

[fortunecrypto]

No matter how successful bounty project is, if participants are way too much and the bounty campaign has no limits you will all get too low rewards, this is where many are confused and complains that they only get 10$ from bounty after weeks of working, apart from price dumps this is another thing you should set your eye on.

Assuming a bounty pool worth 100k and thousands are waiting to get their shares please learn to use calculator sometimes, no matter how long the weeks are what you will get will be unsatisfying already.

The admins and the managers wants to have campaigners as much as possible, because it can create a big hype on the project, have been into a lot of campaigns like this, we can't blame bounty hunters, ICO campaign is very scarce and they want to promote as many as they can, even if they have doubts on the campaign.

[Oilacris]

The more the merrier, I guess. Oof

The majority of bounties didn't put a limit of how much participants could join their campaign. Why would they? The more people advertising their project, it means more people know of the project out there. Even when the bounty rewards pool was not that big either.

We once have had quite of bounties with the rewards worth of millions dollar . The good ol' days, and with limited participants.
No idea how's the way bounty works currently, but there must be one or more managers that use a limited participants for their bounty.

The more the merrier indeed thats why they dont limit participants because they do really need to have maximum exposure.

Its rare nor unusual thing to see a campaign that do limits out their participants.When it comes to rewards then its normal for it to be
partitioned which would end up on getting a penny amounts of altcoin which doesnt even have a value.A total waste of time.

[radjie]

indeed on average the more participants promote the project, the fewer pegs each participant will receive. but it is not a serious problem, but the token that will be given to participants after the prize program is completed can have a high value in the market, so that even though the participants receive a small number of pegs, if the related token has a high price then I am sure everyone who participates will satisfied because related tokens are very valuable

[StephenJH]

indeed on average the more participants promote the project, the fewer pegs each participant will receive. but it is not a serious problem, but the token that will be given to participants after the prize program is completed can have a high value in the market, so that even though the participants receive a small number of pegs, if the related token has a high price then I am sure everyone who participates will satisfied because related tokens are very valuable

In the perfect world, yes but we are not living in the fair world. The bounty campaigns don't allocate high amounts over %5 of the total token circulation, from my experience. The small bounty allocation means the price will protect its ICO value even if the all bounty hunters dump the token together.