New coins supported on Ledger Nano S!

[ranman09]

Agreed. It is really hard to install some software just access funds, example EOS. Why do I need to install fairy-wallet if they integrate it into the software? I don't know if their in the process of adding it, but I think their not, just like Dapps on Ethereum.

Maybe just because EOS is still innovating that's why they having a hard time unlike on those erc20 token based.

Then how about ERC-20 token support on ETH? I would prefer to easily access my tokens on Ledger live than on myetherwallet if I have ledger. Though things work for now. It might be a great feature.

[jackg]

Just wondering why Nano focus on those shitcoins, they don't even deserve to be store in hardware wallet and I think nobody cares if these shitcoins get hack.

To expose a nano private key to get the coins stored in it would be a bad thing for the hardware device. It would be about impossibly (as far as I can tell) to get the other wallets that are derived from the same seed from the private keys that you have nano stored in, however, I wouldn't have liked to risk it...

Then how about ERC-20 token support on ETH? I would prefer to easily access my tokens on Ledger live than on myetherwallet if I have ledger. Though things work for now. It might be a great feature.

EVERYONE can make an erc20 token though and they're not really that good (for most of them). You also have to pay an eth tx fee in order to send yuur tokens so I feel like it's just a way to try to push the eth price higher...

[Lucius]

Just wondering why Nano focus on those shitcoins, they don't even deserve to be store in hardware wallet and I think nobody cares if these shitcoins get hack.

To expose a nano private key to get the coins stored in it would be a bad thing for the hardware device. It would be about impossibly (as far as I can tell) to get the other wallets that are derived from the same seed from the private keys that you have nano stored in, however, I wouldn't have liked to risk it...

First of all company which produce Nano S it's called Ledger, and they do not focus more on some shit coins then other hardware wallets like Trezor which is support maybe even more completely irrelevant coins - Trezor-Supported coins & tokens (689)

jackg you still did not get any clue how hardware wallets works, first you say that is almost impossible to hack hardware wallet and then you go with your paranoia talk. If you get seed from any hardware wallet you get all private keys and full control over that device, and only way to hacker get seed is to user do something idiotic like save seed in simple text file on PC or maybe e-mail.

Hardware wallets are almost perfect way to store cryptocurrency, but like always the weakest link in the whole chain is human ignorance and stupidity.

[o_e_l_e_o]

First of all company which produce Nano S it's called Ledger, and they do not focus more on some shit coins then other hardware wallets like Trezor which is support maybe even more completely irrelevant coins - Trezor-Supported coins & tokens (689)

Yeah, it's a complete pissing match to see who can "support the most coins and tokens". Obviously they need to list every trash token individually rather than just saying "all ERC20 tokens", because then they can bump their numbers up in to the hundreds as they have done.

Seriously though, looking through some of the coins on that list makes you half want to laugh and half want to cry. Such tokens as "DeezNuts (DEEZ)", "Finally Usable Crypto Karma (FUCK)", "Sexy Token (SEXY)", and "SHIT (SHIT)". I'm sure they are all "nice projects" with "great teams".

[jackg]

Just wondering why Nano focus on those shitcoins, they don't even deserve to be store in hardware wallet and I think nobody cares if these shitcoins get hack.

To expose a nano private key to get the coins stored in it would be a bad thing for the hardware device. It would be about impossibly (as far as I can tell) to get the other wallets that are derived from the same seed from the private keys that you have nano stored in, however, I wouldn't have liked to risk it...

First of all company which produce Nano S it's called Ledger, and they do not focus more on some shit coins then other hardware wallets like Trezor which is support maybe even more completely irrelevant coins - Trezor-Supported coins & tokens (689)

jackg you still did not get any clue how hardware wallets works, first you say that is almost impossible to hack hardware wallet and then you go with your paranoia talk. If you get seed from any hardware wallet you get all private keys and full control over that device, and only way to hacker get seed is to user do something idiotic like save seed in simple text file on PC or maybe e-mail.

Hardware wallets are almost perfect way to store cryptocurrency, but like always the weakest link in the whole chain is human ignorance and stupidity.

Read the fucking post before it!
He asked why they're supporting shitcoins and since banana is a forked coin of nano, the only way you could get it out before they supported it was to get the master public key of the nano stored there.

[Lucius]

Just wondering why Nano focus on those shitcoins, they don't even deserve to be store in hardware wallet and I think nobody cares if these shitcoins get hack.

To expose a nano private key to get the coins stored in it would be a bad thing for the hardware device. It would be about impossibly (as far as I can tell) to get the other wallets that are derived from the same seed from the private keys that you have nano stored in, however, I wouldn't have liked to risk it...

First of all company which produce Nano S it's called Ledger, and they do not focus more on some shit coins then other hardware wallets like Trezor which is support maybe even more completely irrelevant coins - Trezor-Supported coins & tokens (689)

jackg you still did not get any clue how hardware wallets works, first you say that is almost impossible to hack hardware wallet and then you go with your paranoia talk. If you get seed from any hardware wallet you get all private keys and full control over that device, and only way to hacker get seed is to user do something idiotic like save seed in simple text file on PC or maybe e-mail.

Hardware wallets are almost perfect way to store cryptocurrency, but like always the weakest link in the whole chain is human ignorance and stupidity.

Read the fucking post before it!
He asked why they're supporting shitcoins and since banana is a forked coin of nano, the only way you could get it out before they supported it was to get the master public key of the nano stored there.

I read post very good, you did not and you give completely wrong answer to user chocolah29, you language is also very inappropriate - but this is only show your lack of understanding and frustration...

To clarify things, user chocolah29 ask : "Just wondering why Nano focus on those shitcoins", he is refering to Ledger Nano S hardware wallet, not Nano currency and you give him completely inconsistent response.

Banano is make airdrop in a way that any user who hold Nano coin should enter his Nano address to special Nano claiming site. Of course that this address should have some balance before fork and it should be empty before entering that site.

Your statement of how to get Banano coin from Ledger Nano S by get master public key of Nano is a complete nonsense...