ignore.

[illusioNiZt]

My fault I apologize to Vod.
Users have misunderstood my intention behind this thread, I am sorry maybe I failed to display the situation the right way.

[mOgliE]

So the thread is in fact to ask Vod to put neg trust on other accounts and not just yours?

You're basically the kid in class who got caught cheating and is expelled and you're saying "but professor, look this one and this one are cheating too! Why don't you expell them too?"

Am I the onlly one to find this behaviour kind of disgusting?

[coinlocket$]

Am I the onlly one to find this behaviour kind of disgusting?

Yes, in part.
I try to explain. All abusers, scammers, cheaters, phishers should be tagged, or even better banned.
The reason for the accusation can be only "revenge" but if we will get a better forum, why not? The result matters.

@Op, probably he missed those users, we have now over 2.5M accounts, hard to track them all.

[mOgliE]

Yes, in part.
I try to explain. All abusers, scammers, cheaters, phishers should be tagged, or even better banned.
The reason for the accusation can be only "revenge" but if we will get a better forum, why not? The result matters.

@Op, probably he missed those users, we have now over 2.5M accounts, hard to track them all.

Sure but I don't know for me you're either a good guy or a bad guy but you don't work against your own camp without a good reason 

Doesn't change the fact that probably all the thread should get tagged though.

[Patatas]

I don't know why members think opening a thread is the right way to fix a trust issue. Almost 99% of the time it doesn't solve anything. Have you tried talking to Vod about it? Did you convince him that you're guilty about whatever you've done and you won't repeat it again? That might just help you instead of retaliating it this way.

[Findingnemo]

Have you tried talking to Vod about it? Did you convince him that you're guilty about whatever you've done and you won't repeat it again? That might just help you instead of retaliating it this way.

I won't work either,most of the time.

Yes, in part.
I try to explain. All abusers, scammers, cheaters, phishers should be tagged, or even better banned.
The reason for the accusation can be only "revenge" but if we will get a better forum, why not? The result matters.

@Op, probably he missed those users, we have now over 2.5M accounts, hard to track them all.

Sure but I don't know for me you're either a good guy or a bad guy but you don't work against your own camp without a good reason  

Doesn't change the fact that probably all the thread should get tagged though.

Is this signature campaign is scam? Then why he need to accuse them?

Everyone have their freedom in this forum about what they would like to talk about or not.

[monero.org]

@Op you're like ratting your friends.

I don't know why members think opening a thread is the right way to fix a trust issue. Almost 99% of the time it doesn't solve anything. Have you tried talking to Vod about it? Did you convince him that you're guilty about whatever you've done and you won't repeat it again? That might just help you instead of retaliating it this way.

I don't remember Vod changes his mind.

[Patatas]

@Op you're like ratting your friends.

I don't know why members think opening a thread is the right way to fix a trust issue. Almost 99% of the time it doesn't solve anything. Have you tried talking to Vod about it? Did you convince him that you're guilty about whatever you've done and you won't repeat it again? That might just help you instead of retaliating it this way.

I don't remember Vod changes his mind.

So creating a thread in retaliation is going o push him forward to change his mind? My point is, if an accused is actually guilty and the DT thinks they deserve a chance then they might just change their ratings or you could say, that way has higher chances of getting your tag removed. Creating a thread against the DT hasn't changed anything.

(Check AnDuck's thread against Vod, more than 10+ pages of discussion but pointless)

[Vod]

I am fine with the trust rating i got for something I did over a year ago Lol, but I would like to know why just some people received it? because we are inactive/not much known?

Only the first ten were paid. 

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Vod isn't obligated to tag anyone.  He does so on his own time, without pay, and for the benefit of the forum.  Complaining that you got tagged while others didn't is absurd, OP.  DT members are human beings who don't tag every single member for every single offense.  Everyone has a limit as to how much patience they have, how much time they're willing to put into tagging scammers and rule breakers, and sometimes members who deserve red trust don't end up with it.  Leave it be.

You're basically the kid in class who got caught cheating and is expelled and you're saying "but professor, look this one and this one are cheating too! Why don't you expell them too?"

And yeah, the snitchy little bitchy type of response that OP's making here leaves a bad taste in my mouth. 

[coolcoinz]

Wake up OP! Trust system is unfair. Look how many people got red tagged by Vod for being shitposters. Most of them think it's unfair because in their opinion they are good posters. The same sentence will look legit to someone with very basic English and like shit to a native speaker. Your point of view usually differs from the point of view of other people and all you can do is accept it. In other words, deal with it and move on.

[Coinifyx]

Wake up OP! Trust system is unfair. Look how many people got red tagged by Vod for being shitposters. Most of them think it's unfair because in their opinion they are good posters. The same sentence will look legit to someone with very basic English and like shit to a native speaker. Your point of view usually differs from the point of view of other people and all you can do is accept it. In other words, deal with it and move on.

Define what you mean by shitposter, because Vod tags scammers

[coolcoinz]

Wake up OP! Trust system is unfair. Look how many people got red tagged by Vod for being shitposters. Most of them think it's unfair because in their opinion they are good posters. The same sentence will look legit to someone with very basic English and like shit to a native speaker. Your point of view usually differs from the point of view of other people and all you can do is accept it. In other words, deal with it and move on.

Define what you mean by shitposter, because Vod tags scammers

Noun. shitposter (plural shitposters) (Internet, slang, vulgar, derogatory) A person who makes worthless posts on a messageboard, newsgroup, or other online discussion platform.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/shitposter