Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 10:30:00 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What type of client should NEM have?
Web Client (ala NXT)
GUI App (ala Bitcoin)

Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Type of NEM Client  (Read 1005 times)
Jaguar0625 (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 299
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 04, 2014, 04:14:43 AM
 #1

Should NEM have
 (1) A web wallet like NXT
 (2) A GUI wallet like Bitcoin

Please comment for any other types of wallets.

NEM - nem.io
ashapasa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 04, 2014, 05:49:09 AM
 #2

its really no contest. You want the masses, please please go with bitcoin type client. I am an average user with limited computer skills and and most people are probably like me.
wakasaki808
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 500



View Profile
February 04, 2014, 05:50:05 AM
 #3

Give NEM a GUI like Bitcoin or Multibit Smiley
Stadtfeger
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 85
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 04, 2014, 06:08:48 AM
 #4

GUI App
unsure
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 04, 2014, 06:13:39 AM
 #5

its really no contest. You want the masses, please please go with bitcoin type client. I am an average user with limited computer skills and and most people are probably like me.

precisely.
Mr. Socko
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
February 04, 2014, 06:41:19 AM
 #6

web gui probably.
norti
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 43
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 04, 2014, 07:01:12 AM
 #7

For someone who is not an expert on details it would be nice to sum up some comparsions for the different client options in the initial post.

What about a lightweight local client like DUB which has recently be released for digitalcoin?
dwma
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 405
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 04, 2014, 07:15:55 AM
 #8


I think people prefer the typical compiled binary.

A web thing is fine and all but the installation was a mess with Java.  I'm not sure there is much compatibility benefit outside of being easily portable to android.

Really it isn't a question.  I doubt many people even NXT users prefer the web interface.  I like it, but it took a bit to get working.  I'd also be afraid that it opens up more security issues being inside your web-browser + java based. 

If you are going to make a native client, make it look like copperlark or megacoin wallets.  Not all gray and generic looking.

The other problem is it is a bit weird for people to run a server and then use their webbrowser to access it.  That is a pretty big leap for a computer newbie. Even I had problems when I already had it running.  I just happen to know what the errors meant from being a dev.
patmast3r
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1001


View Profile
February 04, 2014, 07:36:15 AM
 #9

I voted for GUI but I'm very comfortable using a webbased client as well. I just think people are more comfortable using "desktop" guis that why I voted for GUI.
However If we're going to have a GUI client it needs to be awesome. The worst about new coins is always that hidous qt-wallet Smiley

Haven't done much GUI in Java but I might whip up a python client if I find the time Smiley

sfinder
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 81
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 04, 2014, 08:00:11 AM
 #10

better to be a thin client and need to port to smartphone (android / IOS /chrome app).

thanks
erkki12
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 165
Merit: 104


View Profile
February 04, 2014, 01:39:10 PM
 #11

If there is a choice to be made we must go for the GUI-app!

It will gather a much bigger audience that the NXT localhost web-client! We shouldn't even consider a similar client than NXT. Easy-to-use GUI-app that will attract the masses of crypto users!!
Thies1965
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 10, 2014, 05:27:47 PM
 #12

Independent from the technology underneath the client, it will be an easily installable client.

So either WebGUI or Java-GUI will be installed on the client through a simple install procedure. That will be our target for the NEM client. Source code which has to be compiled by the user is not a targeted solution.

Simple, easy, simple and easy resulting in an intuitive usable client for NEM. That should be our target line.

I slightly favor a webGUI since it has more flexibility in UX design than a 'platform'-specific GUI (Qt, Java SWT or .NET).

freigeist
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1107
Merit: 534


View Profile
March 10, 2014, 07:28:09 PM
 #13

I voted for a web interface but I think it should be something in between.
I' m in favor for web GUI as it can be extended easelly using CSS JS and HTML
and additional modules(pages) with different functionality can be added in a fast way.

Also the design can be stiled with css to resemble a QT or native look and feel.
There is no need for a user to use a browser to open the web gui as it can
be implemented in a native or java HTML component.


Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!