@Lauda you are a piece of shit

[BharatDEX]

So you destroy my account for voicing my opinion on your bash and shitty campaign standards to exclude the majority of forum users from better-paid campaigns throwing at the same time the claim that with lower pay rates people are forced to spam?

You are the reason the majority of forum users have to accept these kinds of campaigns because of your shitty standards to control all campaigns which are being paid via BTC.


You are clearly a piece of shit trying to destroy my account for voicing my opinion on your bash.


Being lucky to have my account destroyed you peace of shit who needs to hide behind TOR and being fully anonym  you scared pussy


Btw where is my BCH you stole from me and many other forum members?

[Quickseller]

I can’t believe I am going to do this, but I am going to (somewhat) defend lauda here...

I don’t think you should oppose LaudaM’s positions just because they are his positions. If he is actually wrong then you can call him out. In regards to the stake signature spam, lauda is not wrong in saying the campaign is causing a ridiculous amount of useless posts.

I won’t comment on the rest of your comments. You do have a valid concern about the BCH not being returned to you though (assuming you were actually an investor in the ICO in question that went bad).

[BharatDEX]

My claim is that Lauda and the others are forcing people to accept these kinds of campaigns by excluding them from all other campaigns.
This is a fact nobody can deny.

Or do you claim that people who have not x amount of merit earned are automatically scammers and spammers who shouldn't be accepted into campaigns?


Also, negative trust is for users who scammed or are going to scam.

Voicing my opinion about Lauda is not a scam that would legitimate destroying my account.

[Joel_Jantsen]

Or do you claim that people who have not x amount of merit earned are automatically scammers and spammers who shouldn't be accepted into campaigns?

They're not. There are members with zero merits earned in other campaigns as well but no one has a problem with that since they're not flooding the forum with spam like Stake's signature campaign. Just go through any thread in the Gambling discussion board you'll be annoyed to see the threads are just filled with posts one after other from Stake's participants.

[The-One-Above-All]

Or do you claim that people who have not x amount of merit earned are automatically scammers and spammers who shouldn't be accepted into campaigns?

They're not. There are members with zero merits earned in other campaigns as well but no one has a problem with that since they're not flooding the forum with spam like Stake's signature campaign. Just go through any thread in the Gambling discussion board you'll be annoyed to see the threads are just filled with posts one after other from Stake's participants.

Even so in this specific case there seems no legitimate reason for this particular poster to have a red tag.

Please present the observable instance of him scamming or else a strong case that suggests he scammed or is going to scam.

Or if you want we can analyse why lauda does not have a red tag for scamming and perhaps taking this persons bch?

It seems this person is claiming lauda red tagged him for voicing his opinion on laudas behavior. That fits with laudas general MO so if that is the case then the OP is correct to have a gripe here.

Whether he or lauda is correct about stake and their sig spammers does not seem to be the core issue here.