I am a bit curious about the recent Binance Hack, in my opinion it was the same guy or girl of July 2018. I looked into the binance Hack of last year, where the nearly equal amount of 7k like this time got all transfered into SegWit Adresses, like the recent one.
Perhaps the reason for this is because a lot of merchants' and people's clients are already SegWit-enabled? There's not much to analyze here if you're pointing out that those coins are transferred to SegWit addresses. It should be the standard anyway.
My question is, are there any differences between tainted Coins and SegWit tainted Coins.
There aren't; they are still both bitcoins at the end of the day and tainted or not, people will still accept it as long as they can use it to buy something or for it to hold value.
The other thing is, who decides which coins are tainted and which not. How does someone make Coins tainted, has everyone the same right to declare bitcoin as tainted?
Thanks for helping.
No authority decides which coins are tainted and which aren't. Blockchain parsing services can have it enabled (taint analysis) on their explorers or they don't, and it's entirely their call.