Bitcoin offers the full glass Banks offers crumbs.

[Mr Reporter]

We all no that Satoshi Nakamoto was a well know pseudonymous creator of bitcoin, which was know to be the world first famous decentralized cryptocurrency in history, which I saw this artwork that captures a clear picture of choice; this mean there is a “System that provides real value” vs “A System that extracts from the people claiming to help them” a little breakdown well all no that Bitcoin offers real value while it’s all clear that the Banks eat money and still leave us thirsty, that image implies many important benefits that Bitcoin has done it gives you the water when you are tastes, not charity’s it hands you the glass of water, but the Banks are drains value and still expect you to drink from empty glass

Please note that This quote is not from Satoshi Nakamoto, was just trying to share a little understanding from the artwork

What the images shows ( symbolism-in) are;



-We are talking about Bitcoin vs the Banking system illustration

- The left man was labeled as “Satoshi Nakamoto” which is representing Bitcoin ideology meaning it (Decentralized fair money fairness and also financial freedom, in a simple context the man in on the right symbolizes the traditional banking’s system which are always consuming much value while there giving very little value.


- The right man was labeled “The Banks” which is representing the ideology of the traditional banks and fiat currencies. Just take a look Bitcoin decentralized and transparent nature, which we no the banking model is built on control dependency and value extraction.

- “Water” in real life water already is a symbol of “value” and “life support” in the economy Without it, nothing grows, nothing survives, and nothing can flourish. In the economic metaphor of this artwork, “water” represents value itself the lifeline that sustains societies, fuels progress, and keeps people alive.

- The little Bitcoin icon in the empty glass is known as “value in transparent systems” It shows that Bitcoin holds value openly—where it can be seen, verified, and trusted by everyone.

Fiat cash been stuffed in the other man’s mouth which is trying to tell us how the Banks are consuming/ and extracting money from the people while struggling to “Drink” value from it

Illustration: a man labeled “Satoshi” offers a glass with a Bitcoin symbol; another man labeled “Bank” stuffs cash in his mouth while holding a small glass of water. The image contrasts Bitcoin as nourishing value and banks as extracting money.

Source
- Ai research
- https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-brutal-truth-about-bitcoin/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
- https://x.com/SatosiNakamoto3/status/1980466042942968092

Bitcoin: The Brutal Truths Revealed

[Doan9269]

There's much to depict from the image illustration given above and in addition to some you have already highlighted, I want to let us know that we cannot have Bitcoin as being enough, instead there will always be more vacant positions of taking the more in it, because it has the capacity for lasting us to the extent we could rely on it sustainability, because it increases in value with time, maybe all that some may requires could just be the consideration for it adoption and every other things could be well taking care of, fiat could be limited to some certain extent as we see how the man could manage having enough from it, while in bitcoin, there's more of the satisfaction and the provisiond for our security.

[Ivystar5]

Firstly, I think the image on the op is too big makes the thread very complex with little to no room for people for be interesed in reading it's content.

Secondly, Well bitcoin offered freedom for real but such freedom is not for everyone, it's for only those who will understand that fiat is a heavy controlled currency and would for no reason favour it's user but benefits the controllers as they print more of it yet making it useless in value as time goes by, the one you hold only loss values because a newer one is out but bitcoin is limit and if youoss the little to have you may not be able to get it at the same price you lost it, and it offers you total freedom in control of your money when you take it and when you sent it out, while banks as an instrument for the government controls your life with the holding of your fiat .

[famososMuertos]

Fundamentally, the utility of Bitcoin is remarkably simple: it is as easy as using it. Everything else depends on each person's interpretation and the surrounding socio-economic and regulatory landscapes. The inherent genius of Bitcoin lies in the simplicity of participation and access.

Naturally, users develop a cultural lexicon and expressions that they like to use. As long as these manifestations adhere to the original idea and do not cause confusion, supporting them is beneficial...
... but you have to keep it simple even with the visual expressions.

[ColdLava40]

The illustration may not perfectly show Bitcoin's true power, but it makes a powerful statement to anyone still influenced by government run systems.

These systems trick us into thinking they are the only way, holding our hard earned money and often extorting us with hidden fees.

With Bitcoin, you are in charge of your funds. There are no banks or middlemen only you and your keys.Decentralization is the way forward, and Bitcoin is the key.

[Emjay24]

... but you have to keep it simple even with the visual expressions.

Great point because honestly the image confused me and I was tempted to ask him if Bitcoin takes a full glass from you and hands you back a half full glass. The bank glass even looked more filled up than Bitcoin water glass which built some level of contradiction with his supposed intent. I think the image complicated the whole topic so OP should be more meticulous in choosing images next time.

Bitcoin is easily accessible and gives you the total right over your finances and accessibility which the government would never agree to. In profits potentials banks never comes close because Bitcoin gives you back every single profit that comes with a higher valuation on your investment

[Patikno]

In reality, fiat has a much weaker, or flawed system compared to Bitcoin. Fiat depreciates in value, while Bitcoin appreciates. Fiat can be printed, while Bitcoin is limited in quantity, and its quantity is even more limited due to the number of lost wallets. Fiat cannot be used in all countries, and requires a complicated process to exchange it, compared to Bitcoin, which is easily exchanged and even easily transferred anywhere in the world (borderless). I believe there are still many advantages of Bitcoin over fiat, but these are some of the important things.

Personally, I consider Bitcoin a safe haven, while fiat is not. I can imagine the fate of people who have painstakingly accumulated their money in fiat banks for years. I don't think they can experience financial freedom if they keep it in fiat. It would be different if they had saved their money in Bitcoin for years, then people would experience the benefits they get from holding Bitcoin for the long-term. So, basically I think keeping money in fiat is a waste of time, and the value itself compared to keeping it in Bitcoin. Cmiiw.

[Mr Reporter]

... but you have to keep it simple even with the visual expressions.

Great point because honestly the image confused me and I was tempted to ask him if Bitcoin takes a full glass from you and hands you back a half full glass. The bank glass even looked more filled up than Bitcoin water glass which built some level of contradiction with his supposed intent. I think the image complicated the whole topic so OP should be more meticulous in choosing images next time.

Bitcoin is easily accessible and gives you the total right over your finances and accessibility which the government would never agree to. In profits potentials banks never comes close because Bitcoin gives you back every single profit that comes with a higher valuation on your investment

Well Hold up guy!!! Please don’t be too quick to judge the image, let me take u on a ride on how most art can be hard to crack the nut well shall we? Well I mean, art is a subjective, well i was not the creator my self but it was going for a different vibe how to just jump into conclusions without knowing what I was trying to say which it not giving.

Sure, the image might not have been the best representation, but let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater, bruh! What I just wanted to you guys to understand is the bitcoin is more than what we think it is. Well after all the  message is clear and has been passed down which need to no that Bitcoin is about empowerment, accessibility, and financial freedom.

And hey, maybe the image was meant to be more abstract, representing the idea that Bitcoin's value is not just about the physical representation, but about the concept it embodies. Just saying!

[peter0425]

Source
- Ai research
- https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-brutal-truth-about-bitcoin/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Bitcoin: The Brutal Truths Revealed

The artwork is hard to understand. Where did you even get it? Didn’t see it on the article or did I just miss it? also should we really be putting in AI or chatgpt for citation? You already have the article on your disposal, I think it’s okay to just include that if that’s where you got your idea. Or was the art AI too?

[Mr Reporter]

Source
- Ai research
- https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-brutal-truth-about-bitcoin/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Bitcoin: The Brutal Truths Revealed

The artwork is hard to understand. Where did you even get it? Didn’t see it on the article or did I just miss it? also should we really be putting in AI or chatgpt for citation? You already have the article on your disposal, I think it’s okay to just include that if that’s where you got your idea. Or was the art AI too?

Well I saw it on X and to me it was a eyes catching art with a great captions behind it, well that is why I if you did read my main thread it was been explained bit by bit, well I didn’t use AI to create the image but I did use it for more idea and proper detail research just as a good poster might do that not all and also it was stated clearly on my thread about where I got it from and I had to go to some point in adding sources.

Real news https://x.com/SatosiNakamoto3/status/1980466042942968092

[SatoPrincess]

The artwork is hard to understand. Where did you even get it? Didn’t see it on the article or did I just miss it? also should we really be putting in AI or chatgpt for citation? You already have the article on your disposal, I think it’s okay to just include that if that’s where you got your idea. Or was the art AI too?

Looks like AI generated image to me. Everyone’s doing it nowadays. The message OP is trying to pass is not new, every bitcoiner knows that the banks are a business and don’t care about their customer. Tbh I don’t think the image was necessary, and the long explanation only made it uninteresting to read.