GSASSET.IO Plagiarized Whitepaper

[qwertyup23]

THIS IS NOT A SCAM ACCUSATION!

Gsasset plagiarized contents coming from different websites and whitepapers in the internet. Below are the evidences and the findings:

GSASSET ANN: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5131879.0
GSASSET WHITEPAPER: https://www.gsasset.io/gsa_white_paper_0.1.pdf
AQUILA WHITEPAPER: https://www.aquila.online/whitepaper.pdf
Hackernoon Website: https://hackernoon.com/what-is-proof-of-stake-8e0433018256

1. Gsasset plagiarized the PROOF OF STAKE category:



2. Gsasset plagiarized their Masternode category from this website: https://blockonomi.com/masternode-guide/


3. Gsasset plagiarized the USE CASE category from Ducatcoin's whitepaper: https://www.ducatcoin.io/whitepaper/Whitepaper_Ducat_Coin_v2.0.pdf



*ADDED BY lovesmyfamilis:


Lots of copied from white paper.
https://www.ducatcoin.io/whitepaper/Whitepaper_Ducat_Coin_v2.0.pdf

https://copyleaks.com/compare-embed/compare-two-files/c93e4d51-4452-4b6a-9dac-fc75a6fe0717/9725778/1/1?key=fq5d7VX5ZojNTrcKYPuS

[lovesmayfamilis]

Thanks you. I archived everything in case of deleting evidence.
https://web.archive.org/web/20190408142325/https://www.gsasset.io/
https://web.archive.org/web/20190415085109/https://www.gsasset.io/gsa_white_paper_0.1.pdf
https://archive.fo/MNx0T


Lots of copied from white paper.
https://www.ducatcoin.io/whitepaper/Whitepaper_Ducat_Coin_v2.0.pdf

https://copyleaks.com/compare-embed/compare-two-files/c93e4d51-4452-4b6a-9dac-fc75a6fe0717/9725778/1/1?key=fq5d7VX5ZojNTrcKYPuS

[qwertyup23]

<snip...>

Thank you very much for doing so! I am relatively new to this crafty skill as I am learning the basics and fundamentals of spotting a plagiarized ICOs and other fake contents. I do not have any idea on how to archive the posts and I will be very delightful if you tell me how! Nevertheless, I will be adding the new evidences you gathered to my post!

[Hellangel359]

I think this is Scam. They copy too much.
Thanks OP.

[lovesmayfamilis]

What happened: FAKE TEAM / photo processing with the addition of photoshop

I believe that managers should be responsible for the project that they lead. They are required to check all the details.
CryptoCraze11 -Disclaimer:: There is No Giveaway for commenting on this thread or promoting Global Smart Asset on bitcointalk.org


The site archive for April 8 does not contain any information from the team. Photo added and edited recently
https://web.archive.org/web/20190408142325/https://www.gsasset.io/ -20190408
Today it is no longer possible to make an archive.
Website: https://www.gsasset.io/

Profile Link:[BOUNTY] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5138054.0
https://web.archive.org/web/20190501132754/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5138054.0


No contact on social networks. There are only names.

All photos are edited using Photoshop. Date of change 2019: 04: 21
There is no reason to change the photo. Two photos are clearly complemented by Photoshop elements.













Also check at https://29a.ch/photo-forensics/#noise-analysis.




This is what an ordinary photo without editors looks like.

they deleted the topic https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5131879.0
That confirms their acceptance of plagiarism. Today there is a new topic, only in a different section.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5138054.0

[qwertyup23]

<snip...>

Thank you for posting this thread and updating my past one. This further strengthens the claim that there project is indeed leaning towards a scam project. I will add these to my original thread! Thank you again!

[ICOEthics]

new thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5147884.0 (archive)

Their whitepaper is 100% copied from here