[Ban appeal] for funnychain - article is not plagiarized (EN/FR/ES versions)

[christiangomez92]

I am the author of the online article - My article is not plagiarized (EN / FR / ES versions)
funnychain account https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2375126

EN / FR / ES versions below
(funnychain account)

-------------------------------------------------
English version :

Dear BitCoinTalk moderators,

The article "Les ICO vont-elles s'imposer en France?" is not a plagiarism because I am the one who wrote it and posted it on several platforms.

The site "DigitalCorner by Wavestone" is a platform of consultants where I contribute and work in. This article can also be found in every social networks where I am represented (LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter ...)

Enclosed, to prove that I am the author of the article :
- My ID where I prove my identity
- Photo of the screen showing my name as author of the article (https://www.digitalcorner-wavestone.com/2018/12/bpifrance-inno-generation-2018-ico-simposer-france/)

Please help me resolve this misunderstanding.

Sincerely
Christian GOMEZ CARVAJAL

------------------------------------------------------------

Bonjour moderateurs de BitCoinTalk,
  
L'article "Les ICO vont-elles s'imposer en France ? n'est pas un plagiat car c'est moi qui l'ai écrit et posté sur plusieurs plateformes.

Le site "DigitalCorner by Wavestone" est une plateforme de consultants à laquelle je contribue, cet article se retrouve également dans tous les réseaux sociaux où je suis présent (LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter...)

Ci-joint, pour prouver que je suis l'auteur de l'article :
- Ma carte d'identité où je prouve mon identité
- Photo de l'écran montrant mon nom en tant qu'auteur de l'article (https://www.digitalcorner-wavestone.com/2018/12/bpifrance-inno-generation-2018-ico-simposer-france/)

Merci de m'aider à résoudre ce malentendu.

Sincèrement
Christian GOMEZ CARVAJAL

-----------------------------------------------------------

Hola moderadores de BitCoinTalk,

El articulo "Les ICO vont-elles s’imposer en France ?"  no es un plagio por que soy yo quien lo escribio y lo posteo en varias plataformas.

El sitio "DigitalCorner by Wavestone" es una plataforma de consultores donde yo aporto, este articulo tambien lo pueden encontrar en todas las redes sociales donde estoy presente (LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter...)

En adjunto, para probar que soy el autor del articulo :
- Mi ID donde pruebo mi identidad
- Foto de la pantalla donde se muestra mi nombre como autor del articulo (https://www.digitalcorner-wavestone.com/2018/12/bpifrance-inno-generation-2018-ico-simposer-france/)

Por favor ayudenme resolviendo  este malentendido

Atentamente
Christian GOMEZ CARVAJAL

---------------------------------------

Screenshot :

Screenshot Digital Corner.PNG
https://ipfs.globalupload.io/QmTdr9vbzLxaYmuxsFEekrryS2mWNjy6wqXvnYzjTZKCMu

ID

I deleted it after a moderator gave me the advice to take it out.

[dbshck]

Even without that ID proof, given that you introduced yourself as Chris in some old posts, I think it's enough to give you the benefit of the doubt.

Please wait for an admin/global mod to look into the matter.

[christiangomez92]

Thank you for your support.

Just some minutes ago dbshck (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=153634) send me an inbox saying, I quote :

Hello

Please remove your ID picture from this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5156554.0. It's not a good idea to put your ID in a public, online forum as people might misuse your ID for bad purpose. Meanwhile, we'll take a look at your ban appeal

I hope this will be solved as soon as possible

Thank you a lot for the help

[rhomelmabini]

I guess that post you just presented is really the one been reported, because as per investigation I am sure that you are not a plagiarist the only thing that you've done wrong is you just have quoted it instead of just posting it directly. I guess the one that reported that post misinterpreted that it's been copied, only because your account here and the author on the article is different. Hope this issue be resolved to get back your account again.

[IMadeYouReadThis]

Posting this piece of info without mentioning the real source should be a solid reason for your account getting banned under Plagiarizm

Quels sont les tendances des ICO ?

Un constat est fait par tous les intervenants : le marché actuel des crypto-monnaies stagne, mais les technologies de rupture continuent de se développer. Les avancements technologiques de la blockchain ne dépendent pas des cours des crypto-monnaies, au contraire depuis leur stagnation les projets se sont diversifiées sur des utilisations autres que les crypto-monnaies.

Les ICO comme mode de financement demeure encore marginal d’après l’étude réalisé par l’AMF, représentant au total 19,4 milliards d’euros depuis 2014. A titre de comparaison, les ICO ont représenté 1,6 % du financement mondial en actions en 2017.

La majorité des ICO a eu lieu aux États-Unis, en France il y a eu seulement 15 ICO qui ont levé 89 millions. En matière de secteur, les projets se sont diversifiés au-delà du secteur technologique et touchent désormais les domaines de la santé, de l’énergie et du commerce du détail.

Concernant le marché français, les tendances sont :

• De manière générale, les ICO sont envisagées par des start-ups, afin de développer une communauté d’investisseurs engagés ou afin de préserver l’intégrité de leur capital ;
• La majorité sont des projets technologiques qui proposent des applications blockchain ou de trading ;
• Il commence la diversification dans d’autres secteurs et les projets sont plus ambitieux en termes financiers, ils espèrent collecter entre 1 et 180 millions d’euros ;
• La plupart des projets d’ICO à venir ont déjà levé des fonds via des canaux de financement traditionnel ;

Copied From -

Source: https://www.amf-france.org/Actualites/Communiques-de-presse/AMF/annee-2018?docId=workspace%3A%2F%2FSpacesStore%2F3cc117ce-60e2-4fb0-9a3b-7c7a47cfb80d

L’étude AMF montre les tendances suivantes au niveau mondial : ce mode de financement demeure encore marginal, représentant au total 19,4 milliards d’euros depuis 2014 avec une accélération ces deux dernières années, principalement en 2017 et durant les trois premiers trimestres 2018 (respectivement 5,6 et 13,4 milliards d’euros). A titre de comparaison, les ICO ont représenté 1,6 % du financement mondial en actions en 2017. La majorité des ICO a eu lieu aux États-Unis, la France représentant une part modeste de ce nouveau type de financement, avec 15 ICO qui ont levé 89 millions d’euros. On observe un phénomène de concentration des montants et du nombre de projets, avec 17 ICO qui représentent à elles seules 40 % des montants totaux levés. En matière de secteur, les projets se sont diversifiés au-delà du secteur technologique et touchent désormais les domaines de la santé, de l’énergie et du commerce du détail.

Concernant le marché français, les tendances suivantes sont observées :

de manière générale, les ICO sont envisagées par des entreprises de petite taille, afin de développer une communauté d’investisseurs engagés ou afin de préserver l’intégrité de leur capital ;
parmi les 15 ICO réalisées, on note l’importance des projets technologiques avec une majorité qui propose des applications blockchain ou de trading ;
les projets à venir se diversifient dans d’autres secteurs et espèrent collecter entre 1 et 180 millions d’euros ;
la plupart des projets d’ICO à venir ont déjà levé des fonds via des canaux de financement traditionnel ;
pour les ICO réalisées et les projets à venir, seulement 6 % des tokens présentent des caractéristiques d’instruments financiers.

[Alone055]

----

Though it is not completely the same, but it is definitely copied from there and then they managed to spin it a little bit, which you can find out if you translate both of the pages from French to English (if you can't read French, of course).
Also, I don't think/believe OP or his company has any relation with this article at all. Moderators should look deeply into this matter before taking a decision to avoid confusions and wrong conclusions.

[IMadeYouReadThis]

Though it is not completely the same, but it is definitely copied from there and then they managed to spin it a little bit, which you can find out if you translate both of the pages from French to English (if you can't read French, of course).

This is the English translation, and yes they have just twisted some words to make it look unique, but the content is same overall if you observe.

What are the trends of ICOs?

An observation is made by all stakeholders: the current market for cryptocurrencies stagnates, but disruptive technologies continue to develop. The technological advancements of the blockchain do not depend on the prices of the crypto-currencies, on the contrary since their stagnation the projects have diversified on uses other than the crypto-currencies.

ICOs as a method of financing is still marginal according to the study conducted by the AMF, representing a total of 19.4 billion euros since 2014. By comparison, ICO accounted for 1.6% of global funding in 2017.

The majority of ICOs took place in the United States, in France there were only 15 ICOs that raised 89 million. In terms of sector, projects have diversified beyond the technology sector and are now in the areas of health, energy and retail.

Regarding the French market, the trends are:

In general, ICOs are considered by start-ups, in order to develop a community of committed investors or to preserve the integrity of their capital;
The majority are technology projects that offer blockchain or trading applications;
It is starting to diversify into other sectors and the projects are more ambitious in financial terms, they hope to collect between 1 and 180 million euros;
Most of the upcoming ICO projects have already raised funds through traditional funding channels;

A new method of financing alternative to the ICO has arrived, the STOs, this method of financing would allow to totally untie the course of the cryptos and the development of the projects.

However, the STOs have not yet arrived in France for legal reasons but they have the potential to be a major growth driver on this ecosystem and they will soon impose themselves in the country as is done in the rest of the world. world for projects that do not need a utility token.

Source: https://www.amf-france.org/Actualites/Communiques-de-presse/AMF/annee-2018?docId=workspace%3A%2F%2FSpacesStore%2F3cc117ce-60e2-4fb0-9a3b-7c7a47cfb80d

The AMF study shows the following global trends: this financing method is still marginal, representing a total of 19.4 billion euros since 2014, with an acceleration over the last two years, mainly in 2017 and during the first three quarters of 2018. (respectively 5.6 and 13.4 billion euros). In comparison, ICOs accounted for 1.6% of global equity financing in 2017. The majority of ICOs took place in the United States, with France accounting for a modest share of this new type of financing, with 15 ICOs raised 89 million euros. There is a phenomenon of concentration of the amounts and the number of projects, with 17 ICOs which alone represent 40% of the total amounts raised. In terms of sector,

Regarding the French market, the following trends are observed:

In general, ICOs are considered by small companies in order to develop a community of committed investors or to preserve the integrity of their capital;
Among the 15 ICOs carried out, we note the importance of technological projects with a majority that offers blockchain or trading applications;
future projects diversify into other sectors and hope to raise between 1 and 180 million euros;
most future ICO projects have already raised funds through traditional funding channels;
for completed ICOs and future projects, only 6% of tokens have characteristics of financial instruments.
The characteristics of these projects are also analyzed in detail, with a focus on investor profiles and the use of funds. The study also examines the success factors of an ICO: project leaders agree on the need to adopt robust anti-money laundering procedures and the importance of transparency in the fight against money laundering. information communicated. This last element, confirmed by the analysis of the recent economic literature, demonstrates the need for appropriate regulation.

I think the moderators have already done there job by banning the account.

[christiangomez92]

It is mentioned that the numbers comes from the AMF article.

The author of an article can post it in several platforms. Because the content is property of the creator and not the platform used.

Moderators should take a look in detail to the proves exposed

Thanks in advance