The Democrats Have no Credible Candidate Yet

[nutildah]

Have you ever seen a bigger hypocrite and a pathological liar than this :

When Obama won

But when it was him

How is it so hard to accept that he's an opportunist!?!

This is a great post and collection of Trump tweets though hardly surprising. Speaking of popular vote, Hillary won the popular vote by the widest margin of a candidate who still lost the election. It's really not gonna take much to beat Trump next time around.

I think Trump would make Biden look pretty bad in the debates, but I don't see him doing that to Bernie. Bernie just needs a VP running mate that will attract whatever voter base he's missing. My choice would be Tulsi Gabbard -- I think that's an unstoppable ticket. Buttigieg would also be acceptable -- guy is super sharp. Its lame to say it but his last name is kind of a mess; thats why he'll never be president. Reminds me of Paul Tsongas, that was probably the last least attractive name for a candidate. Yes, I do believe people are that stupid. Voters, anyway.

For now, we're stuck with Biden as the Dem challenger unless he fucks up badly somewhere between now and the primary.

[BADecker]

Now that logical people have seen the good that Trump is doing, many of them are going from Democrat to Republican. It will be harder than ever for someone to face Trump off. That being said...


Ex-Clinton aide: Hillary will run again in 2020

Penn, a frequent contributor to The Hill, co-wrote a Sunday op-ed for The Wall Street Journal with Andrew Stein, a former Democratic Manhattan borough president and president of the New York City Council.

"True to her name, Mrs. Clinton will fight this out until the last dog dies," the pair wrote. "She won't let a little thing like two stunning defeats stand in the way of her claim to the White House."

They said Clinton will not allow her "humiliating loss" to President Trumpduring the 2016 presidential race end her political career.

"You can expect her to run for president once again," they predicted. "Maybe not at first, when the legions of Senate Democrats make their announcements, but definitely by the time the primaries are in full swing."

She has two years to review what went wrong during her last campaign bid and make a strategy, they wrote.

"She has decisively to win those Iowa caucus-goers who have never warmed up to her," they wrote. "They will see her now as strong, partisan, left-leaning and all-Democrat—the one with the guts, experience and steely-eyed determination to defeat Mr. Trump."

I mean, she probably is all the Dems have at this stage of the game... if she doesn't get sick and die from the pressure of the campaign.

[Spendulus]

.....

I think Trump would make Biden look pretty bad in the debates, but I don't see him doing that to Bernie. Bernie just needs a VP running mate that will attract whatever voter base he's missing. My choice would be Tulsi Gabbard -- I think that's an unstoppable ticket. Buttigieg would also be acceptable -- guy is super sharp. Its lame to say it but his last name is kind of a mess; thats why he'll never be president. Reminds me of Paul Tsongas, that was probably the last least attractive name for a candidate. Yes, I do believe people are that stupid. Voters, anyway.

For now, we're stuck with Biden as the Dem challenger unless he fucks up badly somewhere between now and the primary.....

You don't suppose some science types could maybe put together a Frank-N-Dem from all these half wits?

Maybe a Bernie arm, and a Biden arm, a Williamson head, a Buttigieg butt, a couple of legs from ... hmm...

[BADecker]

^^^ ... and a Hillary heart.     

[Spendulus]

^^^ ... and a Hillary heart.     

Good idea! And since this monster will of course be transgendera, the upper chest section from ...?

Wait. Since demcrats are believers in feeding off the public tit, and since this is a Frank-N-Dem, can it have six or ten tits?

And maybe two or three heads. They could always be arguing with each other.

[BADecker]

^^^ ... and a Hillary heart.     

Good idea! And since this monster will of course be transgendera, the upper chest section from ...?

Wait. Since demcrats are believers in feeding off the public tit, and since this is a Frank-N-Dem, can it have six or ten tits?

And maybe two or three heads. They could always be arguing with each other.

Frank-N-Dem

Mwahahahahahahaha.

 

[7777wonder]

I don't believe democrat don't have a credible candidate,it depends on the speech of each of the nominies and the third speech to try to convince the electorate,that matters


Trump rating is reducing and the American public are not happy with him especially the way he talks to women I. Public and his international relationship with some countries is not that smooth


The former us vice President during the Obama administration is a good candidate , because during Obama era,he was outstanding and also he played a key role during his administration


Good and speech that tried to convince your electorate is the main antidote,to convince people and the laudable programs you can put in place for the electorate

[BADecker]

I don't believe democrat don't have a credible candidate,it depends on the speech of each of the nominies and the third speech to try to convince the electorate,that matters
Credible as far as the way they live their lives is one thing. Credible as far as strength to beat Trump doesn't exist.

Trump rating is reducing and the American public are not happy with him especially the way he talks to women I. Public and his international relationship with some countries is not that smooth
Women's lib is really "women's lip." Talk to women the way they ask to be talked to by the example of the way they say what they say.

The former us vice President during the Obama administration is a good candidate , because during Obama era,he was outstanding and also he played a key role during his administration
He's unhealthy. He is physically weak. That's besides the foolish Dem programs he supports.

Good and speech that tried to convince your electorate is the main antidote,to convince people and the laudable programs you can put in place for the electorate

That's right. That's the way to win. That's how Trump won when a large popular majority was against him the first time.

He knows this, and is fighting hard - often behind the scenes - to do it this way again.

Trump should have it easier this time. Why? Because the quiet majority understands the benefits he is giving the country. But more importantly, God is recognizing the benefits.

[dantee1]

I lost a lot of sleep in 2016. But not this time. Trump is going to have it easily in 2020. I pity those who still believe in polls. The only poll that matters is the Patriotic Americans who comes out well ahead of schedule in every Trump's rally. They will do the same in election day.

[tvbcof]

It is now verified that Trump is a fraud and a traitor to the United States and everything we once stood for.  Many of his 2016 supporters (such as myself) suspected he might be but now we know for sure.

I think that Trump could easily be beaten.  Gabard would mop the floor with his fake hair.  But...

The goal is to get Yael Kushner in eventually.  The Donald is just a stepping stone, but he's still the guy that both the RNC and the DNC will be instructed by their bosses to seat as president.  The DNC will comply by running another unelectable, but as a safety it will be some kiddie diddler who the Zionists who own the country have dirt on and could live with should the impossible happen.  My guess is that it will be Biden.

[TECSHARE]

Today The Democrat party has announced who they are supporting for their candidate for president in the 2020 race.

[BADecker]

Democrats' Latest Bright Ideas.

Democrats' Latest Bright Idea

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BmOGGd-Ivw


https://www.youtube.com/user/MarkDice/videos

[dantee1]

Last night Democratic debate (as usual) was all about attacking Trump. Whoever attacks the President most gets the prize. I would like to see Dems focused 100% on their primaries and just leave Trump alone, but it seems they can't help themselves.

[PopoJeff]

How many puppets can you put on the same stage, offering "free" stuff.

[BADecker]

^^^ But the important question is, How many idiots in the crowd will try to get the not-free stuff the stage-jokers are offering as free.