I think there is a limit to being aggressive towards them as well. I mean we all know that they are running a casino that looks
illegitimate but why we think like that plays more important role than actually attacking them at all costs. For example lets assume no one likes them, but is it because they have a high house edge? Or is it they are not provably fair? Is it because we can't check if they actually have what they say they have?
Is it because their ICO was not what was promised? We need to make clear distinctions between why we think they are not fair and what we think they have fair.
Personally I do not like them because they fail to deliver their own promises to the investors, I do not think their house edge is a scam, I do not think they are not provably fair (not like nobody said they were) so if we can make that clear then they would have to answer to those allegations.
For me it is very clear to make a distinction between each of the things you mentioned and for everybody can see them.
Serial scammer Dean Nolan has a host of allegations against him. The website has a disastrous reputation thanks to him because of the 30 million 2017 ICO tokens theft and not fulfilling any of the ICO promises as well as scamming winners of the 2018 Christmas wager content by not paying them.
The list goes on but most important of all there is a clear distinction between serial scammer Dean Nolan and betking as well as not like them based on their own non-merits and failures.