I shake my head. How can dogecoin be higher in hashrate than litecoin if dogecoin is only merged mined with litecoin? Should they not always be equal in hashrate or a little less for dogecoin?
I like dogecoin, however, is this article only another story to begin pumping doge?
His tweet has the graph which shows equal cost estimate for a 51% attack for one hour for both Litecoin and Dogecoin. I wonder why he mentioned Dogecoin only and not Litecoin in his tweet.
Maybe it's because he found out shocking in his research that Dogecoin made it third while the main reason behind it is merged mining with Litecoin which has given that status.