Opinions on death penalty?

[kotajikikox]

For some point i was thinking that death penalty must be implement so that people will afraid to do Sin like rape,corrupt,Murder and so many more.if death penalty was implemented maybe less crime will happened.because they gonna be afraid to die.
but on the other hand i was thinking that much better if prison for  lifetime plus having hitting or punching your back like in saudi.so that you will feel the pain when you doing such a bad thing.mostly murder and rape must be punishment like you are in hell.so that this will gonna be learned for them and people will afraid to commit sin.

[Masha Sha]

it's always sad when it was because of framing, and when the guy is innocent... however they are always clear case, like when the body trace of the refugee immigrants from muslims countries are left on the 12 year old swedish girls they raped to death...

you see in the case, I am for death penalty for the perpetrators, and if their families don't agree, next batch.

the enemies must die, foreign and domestic.

[butcherme]

It all depends on what did the criminal did to get the death penalty.
I would only approve on rape and murder but other than that I think it shouldn't really be on death penalty.
But I think the best penalty for them is to be sent in jail for a life time and to be thrown in the worst jail so they wouldn't get a special treatment or anything.

[R.A.Y]

death penalty is carried out by all countries but there are some countries that do not apply for humanitarian reasons,
capital punishment is the latest punishment for which the crime rate has exceeded the limits of human norms and criminal acts that are so sadistic that the incident must be eliminated, including evil actors in it must be eliminated to avoid a bad perception among the publicso for me if the death penalty must be carried out against a high crime, and get a strict selection for that sentence.

[BADecker]

We all seem to get the death penalty sooner or later.

If they harmed anyone, let them work at hard labor to pay off the debt they owe. If they pay it off before their normal lifespan is done, guillotine. Besides, that will give their family members time to find out if the witnesses and prosecutor were lying at their trial.

Maliciously lying witnesses and prosecutors deserve the death penalty.

[btcforthewin]

I am against it!
Because the system is not perfect and there are plenty of cases where people have been justified after they have been convicted this is why death penalty is not reasonable.

[Lapatai]

In Texas USA you can get, for example, 300 years of prison. What's funny that even if you die in prison, your body will have to be kept in prison graveyard till that time you are "free".
There're a system that pluses years behind bars. If you cheated on taxes in EU country, you will get some fixed sentence, 10 years for example, in Texas you get +10 years for every 100k etc. (this is a harsh example, I don't know specifics). So if you stole some 30 million you will get 300 years. Sounds logical. One thing I don't understand when criminals get 2-3-4 times life imprisonment... 

I am for death penalty not because it is an easy way, but because tax payers shouldn't pay for supporting that criminal his whole life.

[Wa Da Fak]

I always used to be against death penalty.

My political leanings are mostly towards left (except for abortion where I belong to extreme right and a extreme pro-life).

But quite recently, I have started to agree on death penalty.

Why?
Not because I believe that death penalty is good punishment to stop criminals.

Because, life in prison is a much much much harsher than the death penalty.

Spending whole life behind bars like a caged animal is so so worse.

Many of my peers are against death penalty because they find death penalty harsh. (Which I still do). But they completely ignore how life in prison is much harsher.

Hence, if I be given the choice between death penalty or life behind bars, I'll choose death penalty.

But, will I choose death penalty if there's other alternative? No.

I think even the most extreme crimes deserves no more than 20 years in prison.

If the person is socio/psychopath and has no remorse, then, keep him under supervision after a long sentence.

But it's inhuman to lock away people for eternity (till they die).

Opinions ?

Prisoner are having the life of a boss behind the bars, they all got their basic needs served to them, are they really punished inside or just chilling , i rather suggest poor people to make some bad things and live a life in prison, they are served with what they need, is there any punitive challenges with prisoners? or we just serving them :>

They are jailed, they cant commit crime, but why do we keep them where is the purpose of storing them if we just let them have a life of boss.

Death penalty should happen for people do crime and not desire in life

We are not slave, we need to educate them, show them how they can live a life inside the prison not just letting them spend time in bars, work for their own food, train them as independent.
People will change and death penalty will be left behind. for now it was the best thing to lessen over population and abusive life in prison.

Its unfair for us where we faces life system, we work so we will not die, but them complete sleep and everything.

I not see death penalty will run for long if we will implement a thing that will outrank it, like simple of introducing a life for a prison, Jail should be the school, a factory of worker, and with a peace.
after all death penalty will be a fear for everybody.

[bitcoin-shark]

there are horrendous crimes (genocide, rape, child abuse) that deserve severe penalties such as life imprisonment, but in my opinion nobody can dispose of the life of another person (except maybe god), if someone kill a person even with the death penalty becomes a murderer...

[Wa Da Fak]

Brutal punishment will actually reduce the crime rates so I always agree with the penalty even if its is death.

Life is life you can still give them second chance and there is jail where they can change and if they don't that is the time death penalty can be used against them and death penalty still depends on what type of crime did she/he commit if she/he does really deserve to face death then so be it.

[Sirait]

Just kill them if they did anything harm to many people's life.They don't deserve any second chances if they do then you may need to give third and fourth and so on...

the death penalty is very good for heavy criminals, like murderers and corruptors. many countries have developed because they impose death penalties on corruptors like China.

I am very positive about the death penalty. Since the reign of Xi Jinping, China has developed rapidly due to Xin Jinping's policy of punishing criminals such as corruption.

[clickerz]

I am against it but to those who commit heinous crime, I think its reasonable enough to impose it on them.They are threat to society, those who have criminal minds,habitual ,serious offender of heinous crimes etc. We may pity on them, but we should be pity more on their victims and their surviving family.