This thread you've created is an ugly one.
If you are referring to
The GLOBAL WEALTH FUND: AN EMPIRE of FAKES., conduras didn't create it, I did.
Ugliness is subjective.
Similar to your mistake with the London address (savvy readers here will know the difference between a public entity and a private registered entity), you've accused us of very ugly things as a result of your incomplete understanding.
Please elaborate on the "mistake" with the London address.
Savvy readers will also know the difference between a legitimate, provably functional entity and one created for other purposes
Apart from the fact that "The Global Wealth Fund AG"
doesn't even exist (according to the completely searchable database of all, both public and private, Swiss companies) I will show, in the other thread, that more GWF affiliated 'entities' claim the Shard address as their own. These associated entities also claim legal incorporation which doesn't exist.
Here's our challenge to you: find any evidence that the products and services offered by our parent fund do not function or are not real.
All you've posted is conjecture and opinion. Post a single fact or piece of evidence, and your post will be credible.
Your "parent fund" is not real. Other services offered by them are demonstrably fake.
Keep reading. How on earth could you possibly accuse us of being a scam or out to maliciously hurt clients when the proof of our work is right there for anyone not lazy enough to ignore it?
You are the only person to use the word "scam". Both conduras and I have asked you simple questions and checked for verifications. There is no "maliciousness" or "laziness" involved.
You seem to consider yourself to be an online investigator, yet all you've done so far is to check basic records (alexa, etc) and to weave a narrative built on some type of corruption.
There is not a shred of evidence that the entity called "The Global Wealth Fund" (your parent company) exists in any form recognizable as
" one of the world’s elite private financial institutions"
Or that it has
"financed many of history's innovations"
Or that its
"portfolio includes investments spanning the globe in every major industry sector"
None.
All it has is an expired Security Certificate on its moribund website.
I don't know about conduras, but I don't consider myself to be anything in particular. I conduct basic due diligence from an investor's standpoint using data publicly obtainable and, when I find something which doesn't add up, I share it with the community.
On a "Doesn't Add Up" scale of 1-10, the Global Wealth Fund rates a 12.
This conclusion would be supported by facts and evidence of deceit or scam, but we are fully confident that you find no such thing, as our actual clients are satisfied with our services. Facts and evidence: the Templar Fund is built upon these two things. There is nothing for us to hide. The entirety of our trade records are available online. Try to find that level of transparency from any traditional hedge fund. You will find that it, too, cannot be done.
Pure hyperbole.
The entirety of your trades are not available online as you make clear here
After reading your report, am I right in thinking that that is your total funds managed, just over 1 BTC?
No, we use a collection of indicator accounts in order to conceal our actual trade positions/sizes from countertraders. This also preserves the privacy of our clients.
Nowhere for example, do you share an "Assets under Management" figure, which is a basic requirement for "traditional hedge funds".
Thanks for giving us the chance to address a common issue encountered among the present crypto-community: skepticism that runs so deep, it obscures reality and prevents people from understanding, appreciating and welcoming anything new.
A "common issue" is the huge amount of deception and theft taking place.
You offer nothing "new", schemes with Magic Money Making Machines soliciting investment have been around forever.