JollyGood making false trust ratings.

[bones261]

Anyway, not my thread, just thought I'd point out I agree with OP about how Jollygood is abusing the trust system here, the same as all the default trust guys do.

Unfortunately, for the OP, your endorsement does zero to bolster his plight. If I were the OP, I'd rather have Mark Karpelès chime in with an endorsement of his view.

Can jollygood prove his accusations? No he cannot and he is frigid as hell threatening me to report me for ban if I pm him, he won't have any bit of logic in his accusations just as no proof, just as I see people like you agreeing with him without any bit of proof like writting whats true and what not by your own beliefs, that's bullshit right away.
I haven't endorsed anything how is it logical to be tagged as alt account when I been using this account for double the time he been on the forum? I'm not claiming anything he is.

I haven't stated whether I agree with him or not. I also haven't accused you of endorsing anyone. I was just sidetracked by BetKing.io giving his two cents on this matter. However, after reviewing JollyGood's negative trust rating, I find it somewhat perplexing. I'm not sure exactly how he came to the conclusion that you are an alt-account. Especially when your other negative trust ratings that he wants us to refer to mainly have to do with your death threat incident. He even gives an archived link to the death threat accusation. Perhaps he needs to review his negative rating to clarify what he is talking about.
That being said, I totally agree with the other negative ratings regarding the death threat that you made. You are not Hester Prynn, and fully deserve those scarlet letters.

[JustinBounty]

I thought it was only me but I feel lot of people have been abused by jollygood's DT power, you guys might want to check this out if you wish - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5242995.0

Please be neutral and decide who is wrong, if I am wrong say it on my face.

[OgNasty]

your are a whiny bitch

*you are, or you’re

[JollyGood]

As title says, owlcatz was directly precipitated with his claim and jollygood a faceless liar that doesn't have a single proof where there can be no proof.
I'm not sure I ever saw owl acting weird or I never paid attention but seemingly jolly been doing this to a few members and since a while.

Now that owlcatz has revised the feedback to neutral, will you consider changing the title of the thread and make it solely about me?

~snip~

However, after reviewing JollyGood's negative trust rating, I find it somewhat perplexing. I'm not sure exactly how he came to the conclusion that you are an alt-account. Especially when your other negative trust ratings that he wants us to refer to mainly have to do with your death threat incident. He even gives an archived link to the death threat accusation. Perhaps he needs to review his negative rating to clarify what he is talking about.
That being said, I totally agree with the other negative ratings regarding the death threat that you made. You are not Hester Prynn, and fully deserve those scarlet letters.

Thank you for the post bones261, I have revised/updated my feedback for the OP

Jollygood's false scam accusations caused my investors to lose millions of dollars. I don't know how he's not banned. He's a complete idiot and extortionist.

What an idiot serial scammer Dean Nolan is.

He stole at least around $4 million from the period between the 2017 betking ICO until the website closed down after he stole the final $400,000 worth of Bitcoin bankroll in October 2019... yet he has the tenacity to blame me for him stealing millions of $USD?

"Extortionist"... this label again, this is the best you can come up with? And I used the unIGNORE on you just because I read the reply Lauda made asking you for proof. Time to add you back on IGNORE

[andulolika]

Thought about doing that but for some reason I didn't, it's done now.

[JollyGood]

So with the feedback I left for you, where exactly is the problem? The thread is now entitled (after you modified it because of my suggestion) "JollyGood making false trust ratings"

... Really, where am I making false trust ratings?

Thought about doing that but for some reason I didn't, it's done now.

[andulolika]

So with the feedback I left for you, where exactly is the problem? The thread is now entitled (after you modified it because of my suggestion) "JollyGood making false trust ratings"

... Really, where am I making false trust ratings?

Thought about doing that but for some reason I didn't, it's done now.

Not sure why you quoted my last answer, anyhow how can you claim i'm an alt account? Not caring about retaliatory ratings doesn't mean i'm an alt account just means i don't care. Honestly i just read the "behaves like" part. And again no proof no legit rating, could of done better joining the death threat ratings of those cuntheads.

[JollyGood]

Swiftly adding you back on IGNORE for the long-term now... bye

So with the feedback I left for you, where exactly is the problem? The thread is now entitled (after you modified it because of my suggestion) "JollyGood making false trust ratings"

... Really, where am I making false trust ratings?

Thought about doing that but for some reason I didn't, it's done now.

Not sure why you quoted my last answer, anyhow how can you claim i'm an alt account? Not caring about retaliatory ratings doesn't mean i'm an alt account just means i don't care. Honestly i just read the "behaves like" part. And again no proof no legit rating, could of done better joining the death threat ratings of those cuntheads.

[andulolika]

Well, gotta love how your group is slowly dipping in negatives, you stand on a -4 yourself good to see you reviewed your rating.
Edit: Quite interesting to see you'd rather see a friendly facade than someone honestly telling you he dislikes you or your opinion.

[Lauda]

Well, gotta love how your group is slowly dipping in negatives, you stand on a -4 yourself good to see you reviewed your rating.

Are you stupid? That is only what you see, not what other members see.

[bonesjonesreturns]

Well, gotta love how your group is slowly dipping in negatives, you stand on a -4 yourself good to see you reviewed your rating.

Are you stupid? That is only what you see, not what other members see.

Yeah lauda is only on -3 in negs
Should have way more red

Jollygood and lauda seem very friendly

Jollygood busts the scammers then mozprognoz and lauda charge a fee to work with them to facilitate their successful return to the forum.

Good scheme they have going.

[Lauda]

Well, gotta love how your group is slowly dipping in negatives, you stand on a -4 yourself good to see you reviewed your rating.

Are you stupid? That is only what you see, not what other members see.

Yeah lauda is only on -3 in negs
Should have way more red

Luckily I benefit from these negatives more than all those Turkish monkey combined, isn't it?

[JollyGood]

Here is the view from my vantage point:

Clearly having trolls and good-for-nothing-attention-seekers on IGNORE does help when scrolling the pages to read posts

[andulolika]

You surely have a nice view of yourselves ^^ I'm unsatisfied one can't reach proper red and must content with yellow nowadays, what a shame, if you fuck my rating atleast make it look nice and red -.- .
Or you trying to claim lauda went out of dt1 because was bored?