Should startup crypto projects use DYCO instead of IEO/ICO?

[$anounimus$]

That's just an opinion (https://daomaker.com/dyco?utm_source=lx) don't make it as a reference in the assessment, gather a few references as supporting literacy before you make a decision and a deep analysis of other references is needed.

I also hope people are wiser in reading and analyzing an opinion in the future so they are not wrong.

[Fundamentals Of]

The problem is not ICO or IEO. The problem are the projects themselves. The way the crowdfunding is done is no big deal. That was just a way for interested investors to take part in the unfolding of the project and its product and possibly earn from it. The sad fact however is that almost all those projects did not move forward. Even those that earned millions in their ICO and IEO are not showing any product result.

[jessyj48]

Every new startup projects should stay away from ICO or new fundraising event, the only thing that works now is IEO fundraising, let's stick to that since it's still working perfectly, secondly new projects aren't that serious anymore, they only start as if they mean business but along the way they start relenting, this have chased away many investors

[qigong13]

Yeah, if it was as good as you said, projects would flock to daomarker that you don't have to shill it at here. Thing look bright in the paper or promise but when carrying out, problem rise eventually.