Bitcoin Forum
May 29, 2024, 12:36:35 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: What is the sense in forcing planes to fly without passengers  (Read 295 times)
BADecker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3794
Merit: 1373


View Profile
April 12, 2020, 10:23:37 PM
 #21

Why not fly some small private planes instead just to keep the slots filled? It would be much cheaper!

and what is about the infrastructure? did you ever looked at the costs to keep an a380 flying?

Right! Just keeping the engine bearings lubed while they are not running is hard enough.

Cool

Cure your cancer at home. Ivermectin, fenbendazole, methylene blue, and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) are chief among parasite drugs. Find out that all disease is based in parasites or pollution, and what you can easily do about it - https://www.huldaclark.com/.
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4228
Merit: 4501



View Profile
April 12, 2020, 11:16:15 PM
 #22

a 747 uses 36,000 gallons on a 10 hour flight. =~$62k fuel

a first class seat for a 10hour flight is ~$4k
they only need 12 first class passengers to cover the fuel.

put this into prospective
Quote
The Transportation Department imposes a fine of up to $27,500 per passenger for planes left on the tarmac for more than three hours without taking off (four hours for international flights).


I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
Naida_BR
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 62


View Profile
April 13, 2020, 06:50:16 AM
 #23

I understand that air lines have to use at least 80% of their traffic slots, or they will have them taken away from them. As nobody wants to fly because of the virus, it means that the planes are flying empty. That can't be good for the environment, or for the profits of the company. They should be able to reduce their obligations, or maybe they should use the flights to carry freight.

Mentour pilot talks about ghost flights in this video -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVzMXQ8Qx_s


Air companies might be getting money from this activity.
even if the flights are empty from passengers they will be getting money about making flights.
Or another reason might be a contract that needs to be fulfilled.
Spendulus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2898
Merit: 1386



View Profile
April 13, 2020, 06:26:05 PM
 #24

a 747 uses 36,000 gallons on a 10 hour flight. =~$62k fuel

a first class seat for a 10hour flight is ~$4k
they only need 12 first class passengers to cover the fuel.

put this into prospective
Quote
The Transportation Department imposes a fine of up to $27,500 per passenger for planes left on the tarmac for more than three hours without taking off (four hours for international flights).



Aviation fuel may range in the USA from 3$ to 7$ per gallon, in Europe it can be much, much higher. No way 36k gallons is 62,000 US$ or Euro$.
tanef478
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 25, 2020, 10:58:48 AM
 #25

In any case, the industry will suffer losses.
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!