I don't know but for me shouldn't this be a rule and not a law? Correct me if Im wrong though. Since there are those people that broke these laws and no one knows what that is as they say it, on one above the law. On the other hand a rules is something that couldbe a guide for the people use bitcoin. This is just my opinion though.
The law itself is a system of rules, and if you don't follow rules, you will get punished. How can this be applied to bitcoin? Actually, it is an interesting question rather philosophical and it can be the subject of debate. What purpose the law does exist for? Generally speaking, it ensures our safety, it protects us against violence and abuses by anyone including governments. The current monetary policy is far from perfect, currency in such system is subject to inflation, debasing, confiscating, censoring, etc. Bitcoin protects us, gives us an option to opt out from the system in which abuses have become a norm. But in order to achieve financial sovereignty, the laws of bitcoin must be strictly followed, otherwise you will get punished, not by authorities though, but by bitcoin network itself. You will lose your ability to transact in an open, decentralized, neutral, borderless, immutable network. If you want to participate, you must follow the rules.