PayAccept will pay bounty hunters.

[cryptoaddictchie]

Don't keep your hope on the project which are postponing the rewards with no perfect time frame is what I learned from the mistakes of bounty hunters.

I didnt expecting though even I submitted my content on their campaign. As I visited their telegram now they are closing in the forms for reporting the needed details for receiving funds. That was fast indeed. Now wait for the real distribution.

If this is true then I advice the project admin to create a thread regarding BM's action on Reputation section so community members can give the right solution to end the problem but it will be possible only if the admin is ready to pay the hunters.

Not a good option to do. For me let them settle first their own issue. Both parties will only cut the chase and keep babbling on one another. But who knows the right aide of the story? The only crucial here is the hunters who promoted are the one being pinned. I think the project admin hired the BM to do all forum related so thats why they cant do on their own.

[btcltcdigger]

PayAcept

✅ copying Paypal name
✅ copying Paypal logo
✅ copying Paypal website

What made you think this will go any other way?

[Bitstar_coin]

If this is true then I advice the project admin to create a thread regarding BM's action on Reputation section so community members can give the right solution to end the problem but it will be possible only if the admin is ready to pay the hunters.

It is not up to me to make such suggestions, mine was a personal observation on the behavior of the bm, it is let for the team and perhaps the bounty participants to take further steps if they see it necessary, but in my opinion there is no need for such drastic measures, besides this is not the first we have seen a bm behave like this, if the team sees it necessary then they should take those steps.

[jrrsparkles]

If this is true then I advice the project admin to create a thread regarding BM's action on Reputation section so community members can give the right solution to end the problem but it will be possible only if the admin is ready to pay the hunters.

Not a good option to do. For me let them settle first their own issue. Both parties will only cut the chase and keep babbling on one another. But who knows the right aide of the story? The only crucial here is the hunters who promoted are the one being pinned. I think the project admin hired the BM to do all forum related so thats why they cant do on their own.

If admin is having issues with the bounty manager and still want to pay the hunters then they should approach to the community or else they will keep blaming each other and nothing is going to change.Project admin just hired BM but doesn't mean they can't do anything if BM is not going with their terms.

[stomachgrowls]

PayAcept

✅ copying Paypal name
✅ copying Paypal logo
✅ copying Paypal website

What made you think this will go any other way?

With these things alone then you can already presume out on where it would be heading but who knows that even if everything is almost been copied they do still able to pay but the big question is

would they succeed and do get some marketshare nor do get some support from the community? It all vary with relevance which i dont see for this project to have one.

If this is true then I advice the project admin to create a thread regarding BM's action on Reputation section so community members can give the right solution to end the problem but it will be possible only if the admin is ready to pay the hunters.

Not a good option to do. For me let them settle first their own issue. Both parties will only cut the chase and keep babbling on one another. But who knows the right aide of the story? The only crucial here is the hunters who promoted are the one being pinned. I think the project admin hired the BM to do all forum related so thats why they cant do on their own.

If admin is having issues with the bounty manager and still want to pay the hunters then they should approach to the community or else they will keep blaming each other and nothing is going to change.Project admin just hired BM but doesn't mean they can't do anything if BM is not going with their terms.

BM cant do anything yet they wont really receive the pay together with the bounty hunters if the project admins or owners itself did really intend not to pay on the first place.

They can give out fake stats or sales infos just to hook up possible investors and when the truth comes in where they havent almost no-sale at all then they neither be lying or not

for that kind of reason on why they arent paying but overall this kind of situation is pretty common on todays project bounty hunting program where there are ones which

doesnt really get their pay in spite of their hardwork for advertising.

[livingfree]

If this is true then I advice the project admin to create a thread regarding BM's action on Reputation section so community members can give the right solution to end the problem but it will be possible only if the admin is ready to pay the hunters.

It is not up to me to make such suggestions, mine was a personal observation on the behavior of the bm, it is let for the team and perhaps the bounty participants to take further steps if they see it necessary, but in my opinion there is no need for such drastic measures, besides this is not the first we have seen a bm behave like this, if the team sees it necessary then they should take those steps.

If that's the actual thing that happened. It's hard to judge depending on my basis comparing it with other projects. But if the fault is really at the developers, the manager can't pay the hunters. So, there's always two side of the story.

But the bottom line is that participants, didn't received their stakes/payments which they should receive.

[cryptoaddictchie]

If admin is having issues with the bounty manager and still want to pay the hunters then they should approach to the community or else they will keep blaming each other.

They did approached the hunters only on the telegram. I think they announced the process by filling up the forms. I guess everyone should follow this, since joining on the telegram is required on the bounty requirements. Now I see that the form is closed and strictly being imposed on the new telegram. Hunters should pay attention since there are quick decision happening sometime.

BM cant do anything yet they wont really receive the pay together with the bounty hunters if the project admins or owners itself did really intend not to pay on the first place.

I dont know about the case of the BM but he should be paid even his work isnt expected by the owner. But of course this doesnt mean hunters would not get paid. I followed their instruction as per their form. Filled up and waiting for next announcement. If they would not pay it, of course that comes the issue. But a project tied up with huge projects with digibyte, ferrum and confirmed listed on mid tier exchanges will not run away from this unless they wanted their reputation shattered in pieces.

Anyway, will update you guys here. Its still on process whether they will actually run or pay so better to stick for those who joined. What I dont like is their way of closing early the form for receiving payment since some hunters( who dont pay attention on social group) are left hanging and shocked ops its closed.

[iamaruf]

After BM managers locked the thread PayAccept CEO created the bounty group and they posted a google form. where they asked for the work link. Thought the form was closed on Friday. They gave notice that signature stakes will be announced within two days and social media sheets will be updated within two weeks. We can't do anything just need to watch, they are going to pay the hunters or not.

[btcltcdigger]

After BM managers locked the thread PayAccept CEO created the bounty group and they posted a google form. where they asked for the work link. Thought the form was closed on Friday. They gave notice that signature stakes will be announced within two days and social media sheets will be updated within two weeks. We can't do anything just need to watch, they are going to pay the hunters or not.

Well, they will probably harden the rules, and reduce the bounty pool.
That's how they usually do it. And they'll find any and all reason to disqualify a hunter

[pallang]

After BM managers locked the thread PayAccept CEO created the bounty group and they posted a google form. where they asked for the work link. Thought the form was closed on Friday. They gave notice that signature stakes will be announced within two days and social media sheets will be updated within two weeks. We can't do anything just need to watch, they are going to pay the hunters or not.

This isnt good cause cheaters can use the work link of some participants and use them to get the reward. The action that they made will only produce misunderstanding on the part of the hunters.

[cryptoaddictchie]

Well, they will probably harden the rules, and reduce the bounty pool.
That's how they usually do it. And they'll find any and all reason to disqualify a hunter

With lots of participants missed the timeline, I guess that youre right. They will probably reduced the budget since most werent able to do the form. Thats what dissapointing on such scenario. They dont have a convincing arguement but this should have been noted by the participants especially there are projects who will really take advantage on such act.

This isnt good cause cheaters can use the work link of some participants and use them to get the reward.

This is possible, but we should wait and check whether they have accurate checking of the result.

[bakasabo]

After BM managers locked the thread PayAccept CEO created the bounty group and they posted a google form. where they asked for the work link. Thought the form was closed on Friday. They gave notice that signature stakes will be announced within two days and social media sheets will be updated within two weeks. We can't do anything just need to watch, they are going to pay the hunters or not.

Well, they will probably harden the rules, and reduce the bounty pool.
That's how they usually do it. And they'll find any and all reason to disqualify a hunter

I dont think they will distribute rewards at all. And you are right about finding a reason do disqualify.

First they made a very inconvenient google form to place all social media links for 12 weeks. Hunters must manually place all link to separate line. I'm sure someone will make mistakes, did not post something or post with error - that one reason to reduce number of stakes or participants. Why even do it, when hunters simply can send links to reports?

Second - on the telegram they said "not all bounty hunters joined PayAccept official telegram channel", which is a great reason to disqualify a hunter. Of course, those who is interested in a project will definitely join official telegram channel and will follow news on the page. But in the rules it was not mentioned that joining is a must.

Third - they are checking end rechecking everything manually. As I understand, this work is managed by someone who has no experience in bounty management. I'm not sure that he will do this work perfectly.

[shoreno]

I dont think they will distribute rewards at all. And you are right about finding a reason do disqualify.

why they do that if they arent going to pay ? its like they only waste time and some effort  . they can disqualify because they wana make sure that they are only paying for the real workers and to those who do the job fairly and  maybe its right that they decrease the payments

  but that was still okay if ever im one of the participant that are going to get paid  because atleast i know that my efforts on the past are worthy .

[Cadaver20]

I dont think they will distribute rewards at all. And you are right about finding a reason do disqualify.

I still think they will distribute the reward to bounty hunters. And even if they don't distribute the reward, bounty hunters have no way of disobeying their rules. A few days ago, they posted a news in their telegram that 450 people have joined their telegram but 700 people have filled up the form. So they will manually check all the applications and eliminate the scammers.

[bakasabo]

I dont think they will distribute rewards at all. And you are right about finding a reason do disqualify.

why they do that if they arent going to pay ? its like they only waste time and some effort 

That what I was talking about. Now (as I think) they are manually and slowly checking all the reports. Maybe someone will initially leave official telegram channel and that will be the reason to remove that person from distribution like.

They are already complaining that people did not join PayAccept telegram channel, while in there rules no one asked to do it. We dont know how they gonna use that information. Remove everyone who did not join, or simply warn them. Spreadsheet is not available still.

They can change the rules and distribute all the rewards to their dashboard, instead of eth address. Or ask to pass KYC. Nobody knows what is in new BM's head.

[Bitstar_coin]

If this is true then I advice the project admin to create a thread regarding BM's action on Reputation section so community members can give the right solution to end the problem but it will be possible only if the admin is ready to pay the hunters.

It is not up to me to make such suggestions, mine was a personal observation on the behavior of the bm, it is let for the team and perhaps the bounty participants to take further steps if they see it necessary, but in my opinion there is no need for such drastic measures, besides this is not the first we have seen a bm behave like this, if the team sees it necessary then they should take those steps.

If that's the actual thing that happened. It's hard to judge depending on my basis comparing it with other projects. But if the fault is really at the developers, the manager can't pay the hunters. So, there's always two side of the story.

But the bottom line is that participants, didn't received their stakes/payments which they should receive.

Stop saying what you have zero knowledge about, who says the hunters won't get paid! Maybe you should visit the new Telegram bounty group and see what actions has been taken towards ensuring that hunters get their payment fairly, I agree the bounty was not the smoothest bounty but there is hope that hunters who submit their work using the Google sheet provided by the team will get their reward eventually, the only thing I can see left is for the final spreedsheet to be out for payment.

[bakasabo]

Maybe you should visit the new Telegram bounty group and see what actions has been taken towards ensuring that hunters get their payment fairly

So what exactly from your point of view does PayAccept made to ensure "that hunters get their payment fairly" ? So far it is "just wait till we check and recheck everything and wait for announcement". Creating a google form for hunters to post their campaign results does not insure that they will be paid. Those who wore signature are in worst position so far, bounty ended 10 days ago, but they still need to wear signatures.