⭐ Razed.com ⭐ The Best Crypto Casino ♠♥♦♣

[bangjoe]

Please drop your predictions for this weekend Premier League matches. So, does it seem difficult to predict?
Brentford vs Chelsea and Burnley vs Liverpool, I know that Chelsea and Liverpool can lead with promise, but when it comes to the score, it will be more difficult to guess.

it will be surprising if Chelsea or Liverpool lose this weekend, should be an easy match for both teams.
i predict Liverpool to win with a clean 2-0 (maybe 3-0), but i can't say the same for Chelsea as i expect Brentford to put up a fight and score at least 1 goal.

Liverpool will secure a big win this week, as will Chelsea. So far, they have defended their victories very well, especially considering that Liverpool's opponent, Burnley, does not have the same strength as Liverpool, although they have still been able to put up a good fight in recent matches against other teams.

Considering how Chelsea is building its empire this season, and only in the opening match of the season did they draw against Crystal Palace, while facing Brentford this season with their not-so-great performance, I believe Chelsea will likely win with a very high probability. However, there is concern that the international break could alter the player lineup, potentially changing the team's strength.

[bitLeap]

it will be surprising if Chelsea or Liverpool lose this weekend, should be an easy match for both teams.
i predict Liverpool to win with a clean 2-0 (maybe 3-0), but i can't say the same for Chelsea as i expect Brentford to put up a fight and score at least 1 goal.

Liverpool will secure a big win this week, as will Chelsea. So far, they have defended their victories very well, especially considering that Liverpool's opponent, Burnley, does not have the same strength as Liverpool, although they have still been able to put up a good fight in recent matches against other teams.

Considering how Chelsea is building its empire this season, and only in the opening match of the season did they draw against Crystal Palace, while facing Brentford this season with their not-so-great performance, I believe Chelsea will likely win with a very high probability. However, there is concern that the international break could alter the player lineup, potentially changing the team's strength.

As @Zwei said, this match doesn't seem difficult to predict, and there will be a BTTS between the two sides. I also think Brentford can still put pressure on Chelsea's defense, as they're playing at home, so they should be motivated to score.

[SimpleMachin34]

If a person can't even control themselves, how can they expect it is other's duties to do so better than they can themselves?

This is a direct and indirect response to the post you quoted. I think, not to judge the other guy, those who do self-exclusion and go back to the same casino to gamble, do it because they know that they can blame their financial loss which would later happen on the casino and want to make them look bad. No casino is perfect but as an individual you have to ensure you are disciplined enough to control yourself and ask for help from someone that can hold you accountable if you think you can't.

With all due respect, your statement is a complete and dangerous misunderstanding of what a responsible gambling policy is for.

The purpose of a self-exclusion is not to help a person find "discipline." It is to prevent a vulnerable player from being able to gamble, period. I explicitly told razed team I needed to "step out a while" because of my gambling issue.

You claim I am just trying to "make you look bad." The truth is, your own system is doing that. It allowed me to create and successfully verify a second account with the exact same personal details. This is not only a failure of my self-control; it's a monumental failure of razed security and responsible gambling protocols.

My loss is a direct result of Razed's negligence. The evidence from my chats with razed shows that they were fully aware of my situation and failed to act.

[avp2306]

If a person can't even control themselves, how can they expect it is other's duties to do so better than they can themselves?

This is a direct and indirect response to the post you quoted. I think, not to judge the other guy, those who do self-exclusion and go back to the same casino to gamble, do it because they know that they can blame their financial loss which would later happen on the casino and want to make them look bad. No casino is perfect but as an individual you have to ensure you are disciplined enough to control yourself and ask for help from someone that can hold you accountable if you think you can't.

With all due respect, your statement is a complete and dangerous misunderstanding of what a responsible gambling policy is for.

The purpose of a self-exclusion is not to help a person find "discipline." It is to prevent a vulnerable player from being able to gamble, period. I explicitly told razed team I needed to "step out a while" because of my gambling issue.

You claim I am just trying to "make you look bad." The truth is, your own system is doing that. It allowed me to create and successfully verify a second account with the exact same personal details. This is not only a failure of my self-control; it's a monumental failure of razed security and responsible gambling protocols.

My loss is a direct result of Razed's negligence. The evidence from my chats with razed shows that they were fully aware of my situation and failed to act.

If that lapses slip on their system maybe they need to check and see the issue so that there's no self excluded gamblers would comeback and continue their bad behaviors in their casino.

In some cases yeah the casino might be liable on this especially if they made some negligence towards allowing those gamblers to comeback even if they are in that status.

But do you also consider that you or those people decide to comeback also should be blame on their/that misfortune? Since that situation will not happen if you guys totally forget about gambling and didn't think about coming back to participate on the activity that make your life miserable.

[moneystery]

Please drop your predictions for this weekend Premier League matches. So, does it seem difficult to predict?
Brentford vs Chelsea and Burnley vs Liverpool, I know that Chelsea and Liverpool can lead with promise, but when it comes to the score, it will be more difficult to guess.

https://x.com/Razedcom/status/1966486969850200424

It would be very easy to predict who will win in both matches, but guessing the exact score of both matches is the most difficult because we simply do not know how the match will go and there are many unpredictable factors that can occur on the field.
So whoever can guess the score of both matches correctly, I salute them, because it is not an easy thing, and they are quite lucky to be able to guess correctly 

[_BlackStar]

-snip-

It would be very easy to predict who will win in both matches, but guessing the exact score of both matches is the most difficult because we simply do not know how the match will go and there are many unpredictable factors that can occur on the field.
So whoever can guess the score of both matches correctly, I salute them, because it is not an easy thing, and they are quite lucky to be able to guess correctly 

The challenge of predicting the score is a matter of luck - analysis sometimes doesn't help, even though we can look at several indicators before making a guess. Team performance, defense and productivity goals are some important indicators before making a guess - but all of these can be completely useless when the teams actually come into the match. Only lucky people can guess the score correctly and luck will not come to the same person.

Many gamblers seem to have luck guessing who will win a match - but only a few are lucky enough to guess the score. I can guess the score - but I'll probably be wrong 8/10 times, LOL.

[Dicbac]

If a person can't even control themselves, how can they expect it is other's duties to do so better than they can themselves?

This is a direct and indirect response to the post you quoted. I think, not to judge the other guy, those who do self-exclusion and go back to the same casino to gamble, do it because they know that they can blame their financial loss which would later happen on the casino and want to make them look bad. No casino is perfect but as an individual you have to ensure you are disciplined enough to control yourself and ask for help from someone that can hold you accountable if you think you can't.

With all due respect, your statement is a complete and dangerous misunderstanding of what a responsible gambling policy is for.

The purpose of a self-exclusion is not to help a person find "discipline." It is to prevent a vulnerable player from being able to gamble, period. I explicitly told razed team I needed to "step out a while" because of my gambling issue.

You claim I am just trying to "make you look bad." The truth is, your own system is doing that. It allowed me to create and successfully verify a second account with the exact same personal details. This is not only a failure of my self-control; it's a monumental failure of razed security and responsible gambling protocols.

My loss is a direct result of Razed's negligence. The evidence from my chats with razed shows that they were fully aware of my situation and failed to act.

In fairness to you, you had no way of knowing my stance on your issue as i replied to only a segment of your comment. But I agree, it is a complete failure on razed's part, why have these things at all if they aren't properly enforced. But unless this failure amounts to law breaking, doubtful anything will get done or compensation given to settle the matter.

I meant for my comment to be taken in the literal sense of expectations in life itself. No one is going to willingly help you, which is why it is paramount to have repercussions as a consequence for not delivering services intended to for harm reduction, especially involving at-risk players.

On the other hand, self-exclusion has always seemed a bit pointless to me, there's no way in hell you'd run out of casinos to register with in any feasible amount of time. I've presumed the people that this method of prevention has worked on is older or less tech-inclined peoples, but maybe im wrong. 

[bitLeap]

It would be very easy to predict who will win in both matches, but guessing the exact score of both matches is the most difficult because we simply do not know how the match will go and there are many unpredictable factors that can occur on the field.
So whoever can guess the score of both matches correctly, I salute them, because it is not an easy thing, and they are quite lucky to be able to guess correctly 

The challenge of predicting the score is a matter of luck - analysis sometimes doesn't help, even though we can look at several indicators before making a guess. Team performance, defense and productivity goals are some important indicators before making a guess - but all of these can be completely useless when the teams actually come into the match. Only lucky people can guess the score correctly and luck will not come to the same person.

Many gamblers seem to have luck guessing who will win a match - but only a few are lucky enough to guess the score. I can guess the score - but I'll probably be wrong 8/10 times, LOL.

And yeah, guessing the score sometimes frustrates me, seeing Chelsea's final scoreline end in a draw. Damn I thought Chelsea could secure all three points, so I was optimistic about the scoreline, but the 2-2 result made it a mess.

[bitLeap]

Please claim your bonus for September, have fun and try to participate in some FS promotions on x that are happening today. https://x.com/Razedcom/status/1967438226567704605  Oh, if I'm not mistaken the snapshot for Bitcoin predictions was taken today, right?

[moneystery]

And yeah, guessing the score sometimes frustrates me, seeing Chelsea's final scoreline end in a draw. Damn I thought Chelsea could secure all three points, so I was optimistic about the scoreline, but the 2-2 result made it a mess.

Nobody expected Brentford to hold Chelsea to a draw yesterday, and Liverpool almost drew against Burnley, but they were fortunate enough to score a last-minute penalty by Salah.
So, basically, anyone who correctly predicted the scores of both matches was truly fortunate, as they managed to predict a scoreline that was incredibly difficult to predict 

[tbct_mt2]

Nobody expected Brentford to hold Chelsea to a draw yesterday, and Liverpool almost drew against Burnley, but they were fortunate enough to score a last-minute penalty by Salah.
So, basically, anyone who correctly predicted the scores of both matches was truly fortunate, as they managed to predict a scoreline that was incredibly difficult to predict 

Just almost nobody as Brentford fans actually hope best result for their team, like a draw at least and best a win against Chelsea while we are not Brentford fans or are Chelsea fans thought differently. This disappointed draw is like an accident with Chelsea but it gives them a great lesson to learn which can help them realizing their weakness and improve in coming matches.

The season is long and Chelsea don't lose Premier League title after this draw but if they can not improve themselves and repeat other matches similarly, the title will be out of hands of Chelsea. Liverpool by scoring a very late goal to get three points show that they have champion characteristic and mentality that Chelsea must learn and achieve if they want to beat Liverpool in the title race.

[SimpleMachin34]

If a person can't even control themselves, how can they expect it is other's duties to do so better than they can themselves?

This is a direct and indirect response to the post you quoted. I think, not to judge the other guy, those who do self-exclusion and go back to the same casino to gamble, do it because they know that they can blame their financial loss which would later happen on the casino and want to make them look bad. No casino is perfect but as an individual you have to ensure you are disciplined enough to control yourself and ask for help from someone that can hold you accountable if you think you can't.

With all due respect, your statement is a complete and dangerous misunderstanding of what a responsible gambling policy is for.

The purpose of a self-exclusion is not to help a person find "discipline." It is to prevent a vulnerable player from being able to gamble, period. I explicitly told razed team I needed to "step out a while" because of my gambling issue.

You claim I am just trying to "make you look bad." The truth is, your own system is doing that. It allowed me to create and successfully verify a second account with the exact same personal details. This is not only a failure of my self-control; it's a monumental failure of razed security and responsible gambling protocols.

My loss is a direct result of Razed's negligence. The evidence from my chats with razed shows that they were fully aware of my situation and failed to act.

In fairness to you, you had no way of knowing my stance on your issue as i replied to only a segment of your comment. But I agree, it is a complete failure on razed's part, why have these things at all if they aren't properly enforced. But unless this failure amounts to law breaking, doubtful anything will get done or compensation given to settle the matter.

I meant for my comment to be taken in the literal sense of expectations in life itself. No one is going to willingly help you, which is why it is paramount to have repercussions as a consequence for not delivering services intended to for harm reduction, especially involving at-risk players.

On the other hand, self-exclusion has always seemed a bit pointless to me, there's no way in hell you'd run out of casinos to register with in any feasible amount of time. I've presumed the people that this method of prevention has worked on is older or less tech-inclined peoples, but maybe im wrong. 

You mentioned that you doubt this amounts to "law breaking." However, a casino's license is not just for show. A licensed casino, especially one under the Anjouan Gaming Authority, has a legal obligation to protect vulnerable players. By failing to enforce a self-exclusion, they are in direct breach of their licensing agreement. This is why I have taken my complaint to the regulator as well.

I also agree with your point about repercussions. My goal is not just to get a refund, but to hold Razed accountable for their failure. This is why I am posting here and why I am taking formal action. The fact that their system failed, despite me providing all the necessary information, is a perfect example of why these repercussions are necessary.

As for self-exclusion being pointless, I have to disagree. The point is not for me to run out of casinos to play at. The point is for a casino to honor its duty to a player who has already demonstrated a problem and asked for help. Razed was the specific casino that I trusted to take that responsibility, and they failed to do so. That is why this case matters.

[bitLeap]

As usual, Razed always updates daily on x with giveaways. This time, someone won $80K in Gates of Olympus. To celebrate, there are 100 FS up for grabs. Please visit https://x.com/Razedcom/status/1967800612805873697
Btw what do you think the odds are with 100 FS if the bet is $0.2 per spin?   

[gunhell16]

Please claim your bonus for September, have fun and try to participate in some FS promotions on x that are happening today. https://x.com/Razedcom/status/1967438226567704605  Oh, if I'm not mistaken the snapshot for Bitcoin predictions was taken today, right?

Is there a price predictions contest right now at Razed Casino? I did join through the link you gave me on the X platform, but I’m not sure if I made it in time. I’m more interested
in the Bitcoin price prediction contest, though I’m also not sure if that even exists.

Now, about that monthly bonus — what are the requirements for it? Do you have to be gambling in the casino daily? Or is there a required wagered amount
you need to reach in order to qualify for the monthly bonus?

[bitLeap]

Is there a price predictions contest right now at Razed Casino? I did join through the link you gave me on the X platform, but I’m not sure if I made it in time. I’m more interested
in the Bitcoin price prediction contest, though I’m also not sure if that even exists.

Now, about that monthly bonus — what are the requirements for it? Do you have to be gambling in the casino daily? Or is there a required wagered amount
you need to reach in order to qualify for the monthly bonus?

The bitcoin prediction contest has been running for four weeks, and we look forward to the next contest in the games and rounds thread as usual.

As with most casinos, the monthly bonus is based on your wagers over the month, depending on how actively you play. Unless you're aiming for the Monthly Race leaderboard, you should increase your wager as much as possible. I personally don't target anything and play according to the amount I can afford to lose.

Another thing at Razed, the monthly bonus system is transparent, so you can see your bonus progress at any time. While some other casinos don't have transparent monthly bonuses, Razed has the advantage of being transparent to gamblers.