Trump ACCOMPLISHMENTS

[iamsheikhadil]

....It's his supporters who are causing riots.

I stopped reading you at that sentence.

Expected, since you can't refute anything else

[Spendulus]

...
I don't have to show how unscientific he is :

....

Interesting. I read something as a joke, you take it as fact. Whatever. I notice you didn't answer my question about whether you'd actually read the Paris Climate Accord, so I presume from that that you have not.

So, you haven't showed how "unscientific" he is with your example of Masks, or Climate. Not that there was anything "scientific" about the Paris Climate Accord.

But I do agree with you, "you don't have to show how unscientific" he is.

[iamsheikhadil]

...
I don't have to show how unscientific he is :

....

Interesting. I read something as a joke, you take it as fact. Whatever. I notice you didn't answer my question about whether you'd actually read the Paris Climate Accord, so I presume from that that you have not.

So, you haven't showed how "unscientific" he is with your example of Masks, or Climate. Not that there was anything "scientific" about the Paris Climate Accord.

But I do agree with you, "you don't have to show how unscientific" he is.

You don't take it as a "joke" when the president of the United States keep continuing to say "Global warming is a hoax" while being in office. What else is joke? "The shithole countries"? "Countries with filthy air"?

It's funny that you purposefully ignored trump being hypocrite on the electoral college tweets

I'm not going to take this further. It's pointless.

[TwitchySeal]

RE Masks. It may be you that is "going against science."
A recently completed research study by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in cooperation with the Naval Medical Research Center and published in the New England Journal of Medicine has found that strict quarantine, tightly controlled social distancing, and continuous use of masks did absolutely nothing to contain the spread of COVID-19, and might even have increased its spread.

https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/new-study-lockdowns-masks-are-useless-and-might-even-increase-covid-19-spread/

Come on man.  That's...a conspiracy blog. And it's misrepresenting the results of the research.

Here's the actual research:
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2029717







One industry Trump is definitely responsible for helping is these right wing BADecker-type conspiracy sites.  


(Feel free to delete this post after you read it. I don't mean to make you look like an idiot, just trying to stop misinformation.)

[BADecker]

One industry Trump is definitely responsible for helping is these right wing BADecker-type conspiracy sites...

... Which are showing the Dem conspiracies.    

[Spendulus]

RE Masks. It may be you that is "going against science."
A recently completed research study by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in cooperation with the Naval Medical Research Center and published in the New England Journal of Medicine has found that strict quarantine, tightly controlled social distancing, and continuous use of masks did absolutely nothing to contain the spread of COVID-19, and might even have increased its spread.

https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/new-study-lockdowns-masks-are-useless-and-might-even-increase-covid-19-spread/

Come on man.  That's...a conspiracy blog. And it's misrepresenting the results of the research.

Here's the actual research:
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2029717....

Afraid I'm not seeing much of a difference between the "conspiracy blog" conclusions and those in the NEJM.

Do you have an actual issue here, and if so what? The conclusions are pretty much the same I've had from (A) my past experience with environments where strict and proper mask use was absolutely necessary (B) personal observations of actual mask use in the last 6 - 8 months.

So my question to you is what are you arguing? You don't like/believe conclusions, you don't like the site, what?

[Spendulus]

...
I'm not going to take this further. It's pointless.

It pretty much is pointless. You spew out a half dozen one liners, someone refutes a couple of them, you spew out another couple, on and on.

I tend to debate in one conversation, one thing, and then only if for some reason it interested me. But feel free to tell everyone how you know it was trump supporters creating all the violence. Were you there?