There isn't one for a clear reason, if the sanctioned found out they are sanctioned they would use the tool to bypass that.
That's why companies like chainanalysis do not share that publicly and requires strict license/regulation for its API.
So a public one is completely useless in my opinion and unreliable.
I don't think so. I guess you have no idea how AML scores work. What we need to worry about is sanctioned money that the government has its eyes on. Yes, they can move coins to multiple accounts, use mixing, CoinJoin, and other services, but by doing so, the transaction becomes untraceable.
AML scores are purely unreliable because they don't share their source, and these APIs are publicly available, meaning anyone could avoid them. For additional security, you could use services like
https://light.misttrack.io/ that can help you out.
Here is an example AML report I got for the address: bc1qcatv4gxq24z8hwt67sftjlnlm6dxnk04saz5zw
Current Balance:
401.34777401 BTC (~46062795.65 USD)
🔴 High-risk
⚠️ 15.88% Critical-Risk Activities:
- Scam : 8.95% (4,125,190.6$)
- Sanction list : 3.42% (1,578,199.35$)
- Hack : 3.21% (1,481,586.15$)
- Ransomware : 0.28% (126,958.95$)
- Seized assets : 0.01% (5,513.29$)
🔴 13.74% High-Risk Activities:
- Mixing service : 12.08% (5,569,405.35$)
- Mixing pattern : 0.72% (333,576.06$)
- Exchange : 0.68% (314,702.1$)
- Payment Service Provider : 0.25% (115,670.58$)
🟠 69.96% Medium-Risk Activities:
- Cross-chain Bridge Protocol : 38.75% (17,856,606.93$)
- Large unnamed entity : 26.73% (12,317,266.46$)
- Ignored small amounts : 2.49% (1,147,298.89$)
- Exchange : 1.06% (487,331.68$)
- No entities found : 0.93% (429,088.18$)
🟢 0.42% Low-Risk Activities:
- Exchange : 0.42% (192,175.72$)
I find this analysis unreliable because how can using a mixing service that protects user privacy be considered a high-risk activity? They even take mixing patterns as high-risk activity seriously?
By the way, this is the money that was seized from the eXch.cx wallet.
