I would nominate Cryptohunter and his related alts. He frequently complains about the trust system, particularly those in DT. I tried reasoning with him a long time ago, but he was unwilling to listen to my logic nor compromise.
But hasn't he already won the king of the trolls poll? He can't win everything can he?
You know the poll where he won king of the trolls then requested any example of his presenting undeniable and conclusively debunked information as true or visa versa ( the definition of trolling as per the board rules and explained by SS a mod for 6 years).
Not 1 example was provided ??
How about i nominate quickseller aka Primenumber7?
Hmm complaining about undeniable holes in the trust system vs
Your own...
Self escrowing ? Scamming
Lying about being banned?
Sig spamming anyone that will have him
Engaging in red tag removal trading and removing warnings on legitmate scammers he had held for years simply to get some btc dust.
Doxing people
Then slobbering around asking for forgiveness.
King of the weasels. Slime of slime. Actually I see now more attention must be lavished on you quicksellout7. This weasel like behavior must be focused on and assistance must be given that you may recover and work towards being trustworthy and respectable.
Reasoning with cryptohunter a long time ago? Can you provide the evidence?
Do you mean as quickseller or primenumber7?
Good job I just noticed this post. It could be very revealing.
Now let me challenge quicksellout7 here publically and see what happens
Present where your logic and reason was presented to CH and explain why he should have adopted your view.
I will wait.
Lol at a thread about hall of shame that does not feature scammers, proven financially dangerous individuals or those that willingly promote high risk schemes verging on scams. I dispute this can be a legitmate hall of shame or that more detailed description should be given so as not to be misleading.
The stipulations for hall of shame is what? Long winded posts that you can not grasp?
This is hilarious.
I mean people are nominating others and giving clearly bogus reasons like quicksellout7 here.
He claims that cryptohunter was wrong not to adopt his logic and reason?
I ask to see the evidence to explore this. Where is it? Hurry up.
If he can not provide it just demonstrates how worthless and misleading the entire thread is.
All nominations should be accompanied by corroborating evidence.
Even then hall of shame ? Lol
Proven scammers and liars like quicksellout7 nominating those he falsely claims should adopt his weasel logic and reason for hall of shame.
Is this a comedy thread?
Every person who has argued with CH over the merit and trust system and have had their arguments debunked over and over again.
Every person who refutes and fights against a transparent and objective set of criteria being used as the standards and basis for the trust system should be nominated.
Debunk my points if you can.
I nominate most of DT1. Their constant fighting to give the current broken merit and trust system any value and deny it is dangerous is of course illogical and void of all reason.
Get them all nominated.
The OP needs to be drilled down on until it is not abused and meaningless like most other posts here.
All nominations must bring corroborating evidence that can be analysed for truth and objective value.
Hall of not adopting the bogus reasoning of low functioning weasels.
