I agree with the ones who preceded me as this thread does not really belong here. Comparing bitcoin to those other things, it is like comparing apples and oranges.
It looks like some blatant shilling of Cosmos as for the many YES it provides.
I found the "blockchain generation" row ultimately pointless. I would argue that bitcoin can not be compared to those protocols really.
this is a poorly created and very biased comparison with false points to compare while attempting to advertise altcoins that the creator is probably bag holding.
as for scaling ETH 2.0 is not a scaling solution, it is a money earning solution for those who hold the premined coins. sharding is also not a scaling solution but a centralization solution.
In fact, I agree with the above a lot!
Bitcoin has some real developments going on for scaling on a transactional level on layer 2 (LN). ETH 2.0 is some snake-oil to fool noobs and newcomers into believing that ETH will be better after that. I would rather use Peercoin instead.