Do You Trust In-House Casino Competition? (Wager/Multiplier/Raffle)

[dunfida]

Gambling site owners would neither be minding on having a temporal profit out of cheating or would really be minding about making money in long term ones.
So cheating out those competitions would be no point because once the masses or community got caught you then say goodbye into your business
Its true that even with just those typical house edge and methods you would really be definitely profit and thats the word or common saying that
house do always win.

We cant directly tell if they are doing this stuffs in the past and changed up when they get some recognition, no one really knows.

Even if they are not caught cheating, it will be an unprofitable undertaking. The point of bonuses is that in fact, they buy the loyalty of the player, and these bonuses are aimed specifically at the top players. If casino have not "bought" a player, then another casino will buy him, since a large player is a tasty morsel for any establishment. I read stories about how offline casinos paid the (top) players for flights and hotels and made a lot of profit because these gamblers lost much more than these costs.

You have said on whats happening in reality which i do fully agree.Casinos would really be spending out something or risk to be included on expense because they do know that they can
really benefit from it on longer runs.Getting loyalty from big bettors or whales is something a house do always target on.You are right about unprofitable undertaking and also
it does have corresponding risk because you are really risking out your reputation that you are trying to build.It isnt just on the right mind on doing such.

[Twentyonepaylots]

Nothing actually. Only the integrity of the owners which is questionable since they set up a gambling site in the first place. Then again if you think your favorite casino is trying to pull a fast one on you, I guess it's best to find another that you could wholeheartedly trust, be it in rewards or in-house competitions.

[South Park]

Gambling site owners would neither be minding on having a temporal profit out of cheating or would really be minding about making money in long term ones.
So cheating out those competitions would be no point because once the masses or community got caught you then say goodbye into your business
Its true that even with just those typical house edge and methods you would really be definitely profit and thats the word or common saying that
house do always win.

We cant directly tell if they are doing this stuffs in the past and changed up when they get some recognition, no one really knows.

Even if they are not caught cheating, it will be an unprofitable undertaking. The point of bonuses is that in fact, they buy the loyalty of the player, and these bonuses are aimed specifically at the top players. If casino have not "bought" a player, then another casino will buy him, since a large player is a tasty morsel for any establishment. I read stories about how offline casinos paid the (top) players for flights and hotels and made a lot of profit because these gamblers lost much more than these costs.

Some time ago I remember reading that is several times more difficult for a business to win a new customer than to keep an old customer, this means that if any casino is trying to cheat the players from which they obtain the most profits by denying them the bonuses that they told them that they could get this casino very quickly is going to find itself in financial trouble, because those players are going to leave and they are going to move to another casino that actually gives them bonuses and that cares about them, so while it is entirely possible that casinos are trying to cheat their players in this way at the end of the day it is going to be counterproductive for them.

[Kong Hey Pakboy]

Nothing actually. Only the integrity of the owners which is questionable since they set up a gambling site in the first place. Then again if you think your favorite casino is trying to pull a fast one on you, I guess it's best to find another that you could wholeheartedly trust, be it in rewards or in-house competitions.

If you were thinking that your casino is going to pull a fast one then you know that they don't have a good reputation and you shouldn't be playing there in the first place, I believe that there is no compromise to that because you wouldn't be a patron of that casino if it has a bad reputation in the first place. In short, if you are a patron of that casino then you don't have to worry that they are going to do a fast one with their In-House Competitions.

[tygeade]

I do not trust any shady casino for anything, and I trust any good casino with everything. It is not about in-house competition or anything else, if I trust the place enough to gamble there that means I trust them enough with the in house things that they do as well, if there is a place where I do not trust the in house competitions that means I do not trust them with my money and wouldn't gamble there neither.

What is the point of trusting a place enough to gamble there whenever I want and not trust the same place when they do in house competition? There is really nothing that would be different there, you have to trust both or neither.

[South Park]

I do not trust any shady casino for anything, and I trust any good casino with everything. It is not about in-house competition or anything else, if I trust the place enough to gamble there that means I trust them enough with the in house things that they do as well, if there is a place where I do not trust the in house competitions that means I do not trust them with my money and wouldn't gamble there neither.

What is the point of trusting a place enough to gamble there whenever I want and not trust the same place when they do in house competition? There is really nothing that would be different there, you have to trust both or neither.

This makes sense, it is because of this that when you want to try a new casino you need to do your due diligence, looking a review here and there is not enough, look for their ANN thread and see if there are any scam accusations in the forum against the casino and see if there are grounds for those complains, also make sure the casino has good customer service and quick withdrawals, if a casino has all of this then it is way more likely the competitions they offer and the rewards associated with it are legitimate.

[KTChampions]

I do not trust any shady casino for anything, and I trust any good casino with everything. It is not about in-house competition or anything else, if I trust the place enough to gamble there that means I trust them enough with the in house things that they do as well, if there is a place where I do not trust the in house competitions that means I do not trust them with my money and wouldn't gamble there neither.

What is the point of trusting a place enough to gamble there whenever I want and not trust the same place when they do in house competition? There is really nothing that would be different there, you have to trust both or neither.

This is a reasonable position - if a casino is suspicious, then its individual offers/promotions will also always be under suspicion. As for whether it is worth avoiding such casinos, yes. But sometimes participation in promotions is free, in which case you can try your luck.