REMOVE VOD FROM DT

[kruglikov]

There was many requests to remove VOD from DT.
Reasons: Alcoholism, multi pedo accusations, trust abuse, running a ponzi... e.t.c..

NOW VOD SAID THAT HE IS LEAVING THE FORUM. OR YOU WILL STILL KEEP INACTIVE PERSON ON DT LIST?

Here is his message

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5329366.msg56755812#msg56755812

[Obito]

Just because someone is accused of this kind of thing, doesn't mean that you have to ride with it and you have to think for yourself in regards to what you should believe in since anyone can accuse and can make evidence online, now I am not saying that someone is guilty or not, its just unfair that we are doing mob justice.

[kruglikov]

Just because someone is accused of this kind of thing, doesn't mean that you have to ride with it and you have to think for yourself in regards to what you should believe in since anyone can accuse and can make evidence online, now I am not saying that someone is guilty or not, its just unfair that we are doing mob justice.

I am saying that inactive member should be removed from DT.

[Obito]

~snip

I am saying that inactive member should be removed from DT.

If it is inactivity then probably considering a removal would be for the best but I think that the best way is if the word of removal cam from the mouth or in this case, fingers of the user themselve.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I am saying that inactive member should be removed from DT.

I don't necessarily agree with that, nor am I fully convinced Vod has left the forum for good, despite what he wrote. 

And as far as specifically removing Vod from DT because of inactivity, I'd say that's a mistake.  He's tagged a lot of scammers and the vast majority of his feedbacks are spot-on.  If he got removed from DT, a lot of the warnings he left on people's profiles would suddenly disappear and all hell could break loose.  And like I said, it's still way too early to tell whether he's gone for good.  I happen to think not; he's invested so much of his time and energy into the forum that I don't think he'd be able to abandon it so easily (though the same could be said of Lauda, true).

[kruglikov]

I am saying that inactive member should be removed from DT.

I don't necessarily agree with that, nor am I fully convinced Vod has left the forum for good, despite what he wrote. 

And as far as specifically removing Vod from DT because of inactivity, I'd say that's a mistake.  He's tagged a lot of scammers and the vast majority of his feedbacks are spot-on.  If he got removed from DT, a lot of the warnings he left on people's profiles would suddenly disappear and all hell could break loose.  And like I said, it's still way too early to tell whether he's gone for good.  I happen to think not; he's invested so much of his time and energy into the forum that I don't think he'd be able to abandon it so easily (though the same could be said of Lauda, true).

Lauda tagged more scammers but after she left the forum she was removed from DT

[NeuroticFish]

Lauda tagged more scammers but after she left the forum she was removed from DT

Given that it's basically the scammers crying to get Vod out of DT, I'd advise theymos actually hardcode and keep him there.
Also since you are somebody's alt (aren't you?), I'm surprised that you don't know yet how DT works, since your "request" is useless.

[kruglikov]

Lauda tagged more scammers but after she left the forum she was removed from DT

Given that it's basically the scammers crying to get Vod out of DT, I'd advise theymos actually hardcode and keep him there.
Also since you are somebody's alt (aren't you?), I'm surprised that you don't know yet how DT works, since your "request" is useless.

Yes I am an alt of 10 accounts. Is that a problem? BTW Theymos does not listen to idiots like you. So my advise to you is G.A.F.Y.

[examplens]

Lauda tagged more scammers but after she left the forum she was removed from DT

Lauda is not removed from DT because she left the forum. and before that, she was on a seesaw depends on DT update.
Vod's case is something different, he always had more DT strength and I agree with The Pharmacist, It would be a shame to discard its previous efforts on tagging scammers. although I would still like him to change his mind and come here again once.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Lauda tagged more scammers but after she left the forum she was removed from DT

Lauda had tons of controversial negs left for other members and just before he left the forum it got so bad that I excluded him from my trust list.  Vod has left some negs that are questionable, but I wouldn't exclude him from DT because of those.  He has a very long history of tagging scammers and suspected ones, and if he were suddenly kicked off of DT there would be a hell of a lot of idiot scammers with clean trust profiles.  That's why I don't think he ought to be removed from the DT list, plus as I said it's kind of too early to tell whether he's really gone for good.

Yes I am an alt of 10 accounts. Is that a problem? BTW Theymos does not listen to idiots like you. So my advise to you is G.A.F.Y.

It might be a problem, depending on what you're doing with all those accounts, but I'm sure you're not going to disclose anything shady.  Right now you're on the borderline of trolling with posts like the one above, and I'd advise you to tone it down a bit.

[NotATether]

That's why I don't think he ought to be removed from the DT list, plus as I said it's kind of too early to tell whether he's really gone for good.

I think he left bitcointalk for good. We had a little business deal going on with his AWS boxes that we carried out by email and suddenly today I noticed he blocked my (and I assume everybody else's) PMs.

[OgNasty]

I think he left bitcointalk for good.

I doubt any of us would be that lucky. With all the lies Vod has told, it would be irrational to believe he’s decided to start telling the truth now.

If the daily harassment outside of the forum ever stops as well, (it hasn’t yet as of this morning) I’ll let the forum know. As of right now, it appears nothing has changed from my perspective except I’m now getting lots of messages from random members thanking me for getting Vod to leave the forum.

[yahoo62278]

Vod will eventually be removed from DT1 if he stays away due to this rule posted below. He will still be on DT2 due ti his number of inclusions. I doubt you'll get enough support to have everyone remove him.

- You must have posted sometime within the last 30 days.

[NeuroticFish]

Vod will eventually be removed from DT1 if he stays away due to this rule posted below. He will still be on DT2 due ti his number of inclusions. I doubt you'll get enough support to have everyone remove him.

- You must have posted sometime within the last 30 days.

idiots

Yep, this is why I said that OP should know the rules.
But instead of checking them, OP has preferred to "prove his intelligence" with insults.

All in all, DT2 rules may get changed at some point, since there are complaints now and then about DT2 people that may not handle trust ratings in a appropriate way for DT.
But probably the changes won't happen as soon as some would like.