G A M B L E R S ❗❗ What are your thoughts on this?

[Guzter]

This topic has been locked because it has been posted twice; here is the original thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5359809.0

[Zilon]

I will go for B where I can play game with a physical opponent other than competing with the house. My reason is just simple it's was to detect the weakness of the other opponent capitalize on it this way you stand a greater chance of winning. But playing against the house it's difficult to read the mind of platform and will just leave you at the mercy of complete luck

[Hamphser]

~snip~

Could be A or B depending or varying into my mood and interest on particular moment or time because not all the times im really doing up some strategic based type of games on where i do still end up on playing

dice,crashes and roulettes.So choices would be neither both of the two because we do have different interest but since there are only two options then most of the time people will stick into those games which does

give out some advantage in case you do have some skills and sufficient knowledge about it.Its a personal choice but as long you do know how to control yourself about finances then that what matter most.

[batang_bitcoin]

I'll choose the B.
With that amount, you can burn that so quick if you're playing those games indicated in A. And when you keep on going, I guess within less than an hour if you're unlucky, you're about to stop because you've got nothing left anymore. While in B, if it's competitive, you're encouraging yourself to win and be meticulous with every decision you play per bet.

[Guzter]

I'll choose the B.
With that amount, you can burn that so quick if you're playing those games indicated in A. And when you keep on going, I guess within less than an hour if you're unlucky, you're about to stop because you've got nothing left anymore. While in B, if it's competitive, you're encouraging yourself to win and be meticulous with every decision you play per bet.

Exactly!

[pinggoki]

You would be surprised to find out how reliable luck can be in some situations. But definitely not when it comes to gambling. So in that case, I'll choose situation B since it offers me a much bigger chance at winning albeit the grounds for such victory comes in the form of defeating other real people. This could still work because my chances at winning is directly proportional to the amount of skill I have over my enemies'. I just had to be the best guy in the room and I will be winning, with option A no matter how much skill you have if the house decides to one-up on you, you have no choice.

I'll choose the B.
With that amount, you can burn that so quick if you're playing those games indicated in A. And when you keep on going, I guess within less than an hour if you're unlucky, you're about to stop because you've got nothing left anymore. While in B, if it's competitive, you're encouraging yourself to win and be meticulous with every decision you play per bet.

That is true. We're betting on the longevity of the $100 initial bet that you have been given, so there's a good chance that even if you start with low base bets, you'd still pretty much dry your funds up in no time which is not a good thing. Option B gives you more bang for your buck and extends your money's longevity, since you'll be competing against other people and the results are entirely up to your skill compared to theirs.