 |
November 02, 2021, 07:29:56 PM |
|
I was thinking about the problem of fake news moderation on a trustless decentralized social media network.
The best idea I saw so far was something like the Aragon Court where you have 'moderators' staking tokens so that those who go against consensus are penalized and those that go with are rewarded - thus people are incentivized to rule in a way which they believe the population will or abstain.
But the problem is that things like politics are so polarized you will often see splits down the middle. Not only that people are human and emotion driven and tend to 'not do their research'. Aragon Court only works when there are situations where most people will agree on some moderation task...
Curious what others think about this task since fake news sucks (false data, not just some opinion you don't agree with).
|
