Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 09:36:38 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Phoenixminer vs Gminer for 5700XT ?  (Read 147 times)
igotek (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2072
Merit: 608


Online Security & Investment Corporation


View Profile WWW
December 30, 2021, 03:41:08 PM
 #1

It s an old subject. But I want to learn about the latest versions.

I have been using for two years Phoenix Miner with 96 pcs 5700XT.
I know Phoneixminer in HiveOS cannot mine on 6600 GPUs for ETH because of kernel things. It is verified by the autor. So I use Gminer for 6600 graphic cards.
How about after many updates ?

**********************************************************

Let's calculate:

12 pcs Sapphire Nitro+ RTX 5700XT

667.5 MH & 1640W at PhoneixMiner latest version
661.1 MH & 1640W at GMiner latest version

**********************************************************

Everybody says Phoneixminer shows higher hashrate value than usual.
Which miner should I use for RX 5700XT GPUs ?

I cannot live, I cannot die, trapped in myself.
Hold my breath as I wish for death. Oh please god, help me !
tangy_t
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 27
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 30, 2021, 04:56:46 PM
 #2

Why not TRM? TRM has been solid on my 5700xts, isnt Gminer geared more for nvidia?
MCcryptonia
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 155
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 30, 2021, 06:22:58 PM
 #3

Anything AMD I don't bother using other mining softwares for them than team red miner, TRM is like what AMD cards needs exactly for mining it works flawlessly for every single AMD graphic cards even the old Rx Vega 56 and 64 this miner safe me

deedeeranged
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 325
Merit: 42


View Profile
December 30, 2021, 07:22:45 PM
 #4

I have a RX 6600 XT running with PhoenixMiner on Ubuntu 20.04.3 with amdgpu-pro-driver-21.30.

*** 115:20 *** 12/30 20:13 **************************************
Eth: Mining ETH on ssl://eu1.ethermine.org:5555 for 95:03
Available GPUs for mining:
GPU1: ASRock Navi 23 [Radeon RX 6600/6600 XT/6600M] (pcie 45), OpenCL 2.0, 8 GB VRAM, 32 CUs
GPU1: 54C 7% 66W
GPU1: cclock 1190 MHz, cvddc 743 mV, mclock 1169 MHz, Tj 59C, Tmem 74C, 509 kH/J
GPUs power: 66.0 W; cost: 0.48 USD/day; 509 kH/J
Current -gt 15
Eth: Accepted shares 3070 (5 stales), rejected shares 0 (0 stales)
Eth: Incorrect shares 0 (0.00%), est. stales percentage 0.16%
Eth: Maximum difficulty of found share: 14.1 TH (!!!)
Eth: Average speed (5 min): 33.584 MH/s
Eth: Effective speed: 31.76 MH/s; at pool: 31.76 MH/s

At pool
Hashrate Current Average        Reported      Shares Valid Stale  Invalid
40.6 MH/s             31.9 MH/s     33.6 MH/s     100%   34     0        0

So it seems that PM can measure up against TRM.
sxemini
Member
**
Online Online

Activity: 1558
Merit: 69


View Profile
December 31, 2021, 08:41:01 PM
 #5

I have a RX 6600 XT running with PhoenixMiner on Ubuntu 20.04.3 with amdgpu-pro-driver-21.30.

*** 115:20 *** 12/30 20:13 **************************************
Eth: Mining ETH on ssl://eu1.ethermine.org:5555 for 95:03
Available GPUs for mining:
GPU1: ASRock Navi 23 [Radeon RX 6600/6600 XT/6600M] (pcie 45), OpenCL 2.0, 8 GB VRAM, 32 CUs
GPU1: 54C 7% 66W
GPU1: cclock 1190 MHz, cvddc 743 mV, mclock 1169 MHz, Tj 59C, Tmem 74C, 509 kH/J
GPUs power: 66.0 W; cost: 0.48 USD/day; 509 kH/J
Current -gt 15
Eth: Accepted shares 3070 (5 stales), rejected shares 0 (0 stales)
Eth: Incorrect shares 0 (0.00%), est. stales percentage 0.16%
Eth: Maximum difficulty of found share: 14.1 TH (!!!)
Eth: Average speed (5 min): 33.584 MH/s
Eth: Effective speed: 31.76 MH/s; at pool: 31.76 MH/s

At pool
Hashrate Current Average        Reported      Shares Valid Stale  Invalid
40.6 MH/s             31.9 MH/s     33.6 MH/s     100%   34     0        0

So it seems that PM can measure up against TRM.

You show the PM stats, this are not important. And as you see - your average hashrate is 31.9, your effective pool hashrate is only 31.76!!!!! and the miner reports 33.6 = around 7% - 8% difference
Count the pool shares and compare it with TRM and you will see slightly more shares for TRM or the same, but TRM reports less but more accurated hashrate. Phönixminer inflates the reported hashrate up to 5%.
Your GPU use also to much power - reduce coreclock to 900 and vcore to 660mv and the card use 10w less.
deedeeranged
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 325
Merit: 42


View Profile
January 01, 2022, 02:03:33 PM
 #6

I have a RX 6600 XT running with PhoenixMiner on Ubuntu 20.04.3 with amdgpu-pro-driver-21.30.

*** 115:20 *** 12/30 20:13 **************************************
Eth: Mining ETH on ssl://eu1.ethermine.org:5555 for 95:03
Available GPUs for mining:
GPU1: ASRock Navi 23 [Radeon RX 6600/6600 XT/6600M] (pcie 45), OpenCL 2.0, 8 GB VRAM, 32 CUs
GPU1: 54C 7% 66W
GPU1: cclock 1190 MHz, cvddc 743 mV, mclock 1169 MHz, Tj 59C, Tmem 74C, 509 kH/J
GPUs power: 66.0 W; cost: 0.48 USD/day; 509 kH/J
Current -gt 15
Eth: Accepted shares 3070 (5 stales), rejected shares 0 (0 stales)
Eth: Incorrect shares 0 (0.00%), est. stales percentage 0.16%
Eth: Maximum difficulty of found share: 14.1 TH (!!!)
Eth: Average speed (5 min): 33.584 MH/s
Eth: Effective speed: 31.76 MH/s; at pool: 31.76 MH/s

At pool
Hashrate Current Average        Reported      Shares Valid Stale  Invalid
40.6 MH/s             31.9 MH/s     33.6 MH/s     100%   34     0        0

So it seems that PM can measure up against TRM.

You show the PM stats, this are not important. And as you see - your average hashrate is 31.9, your effective pool hashrate is only 31.76!!!!! and the miner reports 33.6 = around 7% - 8% difference
Count the pool shares and compare it with TRM and you will see slightly more shares for TRM or the same, but TRM reports less but more accurated hashrate. Phönixminer inflates the reported hashrate up to 5%.
Your GPU use also to much power - reduce coreclock to 900 and vcore to 660mv and the card use 10w less.

I only showed the PM stats to show that PM works with RX 6600 XT card and |I know effective pool speed is relavant but goes for every miner as it is irrelavant what the miner reports.
igotek (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 2072
Merit: 608


Online Security & Investment Corporation


View Profile WWW
January 01, 2022, 07:45:57 PM
 #7

Why not TRM? TRM has been solid on my 5700xts, isnt Gminer geared more for nvidia?

I have just tried the latest v of TRM. => 1460W 643.7 MH

And I did my all test at lowest reasonable clocks:

Core: 1375
Core Voltage: 750
Memory Controller Voltage: 750
Memory: 875
Memory Voltage: 1350


I cannot live, I cannot die, trapped in myself.
Hold my breath as I wish for death. Oh please god, help me !
HardCore12V
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 223
Merit: 13


View Profile
January 02, 2022, 07:46:41 AM
 #8

Why not TRM? TRM has been solid on my 5700xts, isnt Gminer geared more for nvidia?

I have just tried the latest v of TRM. => 1460W 643.7 MH

And I did my all test at lowest reasonable clocks:

Core: 1375
Core Voltage: 750
Memory Controller Voltage: 750
Memory: 875
Memory Voltage: 1350


Looks like the phoenix miner works best for you but for many the Teamred miner is always the best, look into the driver parts also are you running in hive OS or windows OS? Best performance for me is through HiveOS make sure you use blockchain driver if you are on windows OS

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!