Deleted

The purpose of this thread is not entirely clear. But, in order not to justify the expectations in criticism, as you suggest, I will add a little.
Very difficult to read. The forum does not assign any positions to anyone, and your views look as if this is not a free forum where everyone has the right to vote, but some kind of closed prison, with its own strict laws.
Relax, buddy.

Some classification can be justified but some arent or I think even without mentioning is really exist on forum. I wonder where did you get the idea of eafh description or you just based it on your own idea.

I remember I did something like this but very close to characteristic and idea of a certain users lingering here. But anyway thats a lot of effort to post in. Not sure though if others would agree with some description.

I think you've forgotten a big category of users : the spammers. People only posting for money and nothing else. They don't care about the topic they are posting on, have no experience with it but don't hesitate to create a fake one if necessary. They usually don't read the other answers of the thread except a random couple of ones they use to inspire their own posts which inevitably leads to repeat what it has been said several times before and to exasperate the legit readers. A part of them likes to write long posts with useless and off-topic details or one same idea repeated several times in a row with different words, naively hoping not to be spotted as a spammer by doing that. Many come from poor countries but not all of them.

Quote from: lovesmayfamilis on July 09, 2022, 06:40:40 AM

The purpose of this thread is not entirely clear.

Well, I guess he had such a classification in his head and has created such a thread to see if he gets any merit.

I see the ranking as somewhat arbitrary. To make classifications I would add those who defend privacy in Bitcoin to the maximum vs those who think that loss of privacy is inevitable (with more and more AML/KYC, blacklists etc.) and those who absolutely don't care.

Better not categorize each user to avoid getting bad impression towards what you do and maybe there are users will not like what they are reading base on the meaning you put on this thread. Anyways its cool to see how you put some efforts to write this since for sure it takes time before to write up this long statement towards each users classification here.

I think you are wrong and that the members of this forum can't be categorized in that way.
Members can have many different interests and at one moment they can deal with more technical things and at another they can deal more with some general topics about the forum or crypto regulation.
I would divide forum members into 2 groups, good members who contribute to the forum and bad members who spam the forum and don't contribute to the forum.
It is the only division of members that makes any sense.
p.s. I just saw, after writing my post, that the OP deleted his opening post. I suggest that if the OP has given up on the topic, he should lock this topic.