Even if that's true (I have no idea where that information came from), blockchain.com is still, if I'm not mistaken, a non-custodial wallet. You have full control of your private keys, not the company.
I remember something about them having two wallets; one custodial and one non-custodial, but I may be wrong and it could be a different company.
Anyhow, there are issues with wallets like this, even if they give you access to your seed words. For example:
We’ve Got Your Back(up)
Your encrypted wallet is automatically backed up to our servers.
Can we trust this encryption? Can they extract our keys? If they stole coins, we would notice, but what if they
only stole our xpub to deanonymize us? Many uncertainties that can easily be avoided.
OP's question gives me a bad feeling in my gut, and I would strongly recommend not going this route, unless he is planning some kind of online service where a cutodial wallet is absolutely necessary.
Yes, it's 2022 - if they need an account-based deposit system that's one thing; but if they plan to build an online wallet in 2022, they're years behind the widely accepted state-of-the art. Ordinary people use non-custodial, open-source wallet applications on their phones with or without a paired hardware wallet - they don't need online wallets (anymore (?)).