When Block-Chain technology first emerged, we imagined a system that was decentralized, much more free, where community decisions were not governed by a superior authority, just as the same state did. For years, this thought had been driven by the sufferings and feelings of being exploited by the state and capitalist corporations. In our lives, we've been enslaved so that someone's son can get in the most luxurious car. And we got used to it, we got it.
However, block-chain technology had come up with the dream of establishing a much more fair, secure equal system that would prevent monopolization of money supply. Personally, I'm still living this dream inside me. I never wanted to accept the management of block-chain technology by a certain authority, and I don't want it. Who really thinks some people have to respect their decisions because they have more cryptocurrency?
That's why I want to talk about the process that started with Binance's crazy BSV. I don't care if Bitcoin Cash is shitcoin or anything. In the community, I think everyone should equally express their opinion.
But how should it really be read that Binance is drilling BSV just because the CEO wanted it? On this basis, many exchanges have accepted Binancane's monopoly and continue to follow its path. But now we are talking about the dominance of a powerful exchange instead of the consensus. Some conflicts of interest give us the impression that what we dream of is actually coinciding.
What I have written so far may be a critical approach to the insane handling of BSV. Well, let's ask the bidet.:
Many security measures have been developed to prevent scam ICO projects from entering the market and to keep them out of the system. 2 years ago, this issue drew a serious reaction. But now that we look at it, we see how accurate this decision is.
So what exactly should we think about BSV being nuts? Please share your ideas and discuss them.
