Can i post satoshi posts in other forums here?

[ajaxtempest]

Hi Guys,
I have a couple of threads by a person claiming to be  satoshi who allegedly  posted in 2013/2014 in a conspiracy forum. Can i post the threads here so users can use discernment and discuss the veracity of his claims?


He always posted his key as
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iF4EAREIAAYFAlKP014ACgkQBJTGcyJSyfktUwD+LCB81bnOqtUf0/VJW3gjY​0Tv
DZnhW/831QjRmepDiCwA/1hJMQqNofjZ+8Gp46O8WU1h9qtJ9M5vNMD8607jv​yur
=KbxF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[The Cryptovator]

A couple of people have claimed to be Satoshi till now. But eventually, everyone failed to prove themselves. So posting here so-called Satoshi post from an unknown forum would create more misunderstandings and arguments. I don't think it's reasonable to make a post here about these kinds of stuff. Why Satoshi can't post himself here is he real Satoshi? He could claim his account with proper evidence. We don't know if the PGP signature is from real Satoshi address.

[jackg]

If you post them just make sure to include a link to the original source so you're not done for plagiarism (also if the source is considered bad, your thread might be deleted anyway as you're quite new to the forum so consider that before posting things).

I don't know how interested people are here in working out who satoshi is, you'll probably get some level of discussion though.

[DaveF]

I would just ignore them and not feed the trolls by posting their junk here. The other thing you could do is just link to where they are posting and let anyone here who is motivated go over there and show the users there why that person is a scammer / troll.

Either way, it's probably a waste of time, some people will believe what they want to believe no matter what proof you show them otherwise. Since you said it's a conspiracy forum you probably can't get through their tinfoil hats anyway.....

-Dave

[cryptoaddictchie]

Can i post the threads here so users can use discernment and discuss the veracity of his claims?

For the sake of discussion why not. Probably another fake Satoshi. Its quite long since Satoshi's last post. But the rule of thumb of provings oneself here is the access of the wallet he used(even though he might got hack or what? But lol someone created bitcoin can possibly 99.9% knew how to evade potential threat or breach). Maybe we can say he is once he can move funds from Satoshis wallet.

[ajaxtempest]

Here goes. Its a link in a link

Thanks for the replies. Let me give an real life example of OP system
https://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2415307/pg1

See how easy it is to view only OP posts!

second one

read the first reply
https://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2417375/pg1

third one (many posts)
https://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2492878/pg4#43009135

 

[BlackHatCoiner]

Your title is a clickbait. Satoshi wasn't used to post in "conspiracy forums" as you say. You can give us any thread you want, but it'll just be another disappointing impersonation attempt.

Also, this:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iF4EAREIAAYFAlKP014ACgkQBJTGcyJSyfktUwD+LCB81bnOqtUf0/VJW3gjY​0Tv
DZnhW/831QjRmepDiCwA/1hJMQqNofjZ+8Gp46O8WU1h9qtJ9M5vNMD8607jv​yur
=KbxF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

is not a key. It's a signature. And it usually comes with a message and a public key.

[PX-Z]

No need. And why satoshi claiming being satoshi in a conspiracy forums? What he's trying to prove there lol.

Everyone can claimed to be satoshi in fact hundreds of them already, some are in the court fighting and claiming shits.
As long as there's no proof  given that can be validated, it's useless to give time for such person.

[sheenshane]

As long as they dont have enough valid proof, we're never wasting our time with those nonsense posts from conspiracy forums.

There are people who keep claiming that they're the ones who created Bitcoin but in fact, they don't have enough proof of that.  Only here on this forum and Reddit which I believe satoshi had visited the forum.

It seems you're shilling that forum here on us which I didn't continue to read and agree he terms.

[Gallar]

there are always people who claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto, but in my personal opinion, Satoshi Nakamoto is very secretive, until now, he doesn't want his identity to be known by others.

everyone also doesn't know satoshi is a group or individual,
don't be too dizzy, the important thing is that we use the discovery well.

[Kemarit]

Many have come forward and claim to be Satoshi, and they all have been proven to be fake or just riding on the popularity of that name. And with that, i doubt that suddenly we will find another one that is true to be Satoshi.

Again, there are a lot of conspiracies in the past but nothing has been proven yet.

So we should rest our case chasing Satoshi. Or for those who might claim to be one in the future, just look at the facts and then ignore them, simple as that.

[Aanuoluwatofunmi]

Hi Guys,
I have a couple of threads by a person claiming to be  satoshi who allegedly  posted in 2013/2014 in a conspiracy forum. Can i post the threads here so users can use discernment and discuss the veracity of his claims?

Why should the forum get concerned with that, not even on this forum but from another platform, who cares, many have been doing same even on this forum and we give less attention to them because they never prove so, this is a simple detection one can use to identify Satoshi, just sign a message, simple, by now we should start getting use to know the fact that everybody want to be identified with Satoshi either by one means or the other, good or bad because it's a household name that has gained enough recognition for everyone to wish bearing it, but must they do so in deceiving others, creating manipulations, scamming and all manners of illicit activities, should we now be concerned about them all when they have no legitimate means to proof they are Satoshi.

[NeuroticFish]

So he leaves the bitcoin community in 2010 and risks to check in a conspiracy theory forum in 2013 just to say he's real? LOL!
Even more, "his" writing style looks different in 2013.

And that signature may or may not mean anything, but as it is, it's just a signature out of context. Can be anything.
Nice try, but wrong audience. 

[bitzizzix]

I think some people really like to make a lot of conspiracies and fairy tales without looking at the facts, and I think the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto will never be solved.
and no one, myself included, is currently signing with wallet digital keys, PGP keys, or genesis blocks. Actually I didn't move a single bitcoin.
and it makes me laugh out loud reading so much bullshit on a page full of conspiracy theories to change the facts. Dorian Nakamoto, Nick Sabo, Hal Finney, Alan Musk, Gavin Andresen and many others deny that they are Satoshi Nakamoto without any accurate evidence. And also Craig Wright used old transactions to try to prove his claim and couldn't sign with any digital keys. Not even signing with PGP key or genesis.

[CaVO32]

So he leaves the bitcoin community in 2010 and risks to check in a conspiracy theory forum in 2013 just to say he's real? LOL!
Even more, "his" writing style looks different in 2013.

And that signature may or may not mean anything, but as it is, it's just a signature out of context. Can be anything.
Nice try, but wrong audience. 

Exactly! Why would he post that in other forums if he is real? I am not seeing any valid reason why he will do that, if he is indeed Satoshi. A lot of people just want to mess up people's minds. They can easily create such seemingly signed message but it doesn't say anything at all.

[Bitcoin_Arena]

I don't know what the contents of the links you shared are because as soon as a clicked on one of them I ended up viewing a wall of text membership contract crap and I didn't go any further.

Is it possible for you to quote exactly what is said in the post or even screen shoot it?
I am not about to sign up for their bullshit

[Baofeng]

I don't know what the contents of the links you shared are because as soon as a clicked on one of them I ended up viewing a wall of text membership contract crap and I didn't go any further.

Is it possible for you to quote exactly what is said in the post or even screen shoot it?
I am not about to sign up for their bullshit

Right, and so I don't want to take that risk as well so I didn't click and read what's the supposedly "proof".

Nevertheless, as others have said, it's just a signature, and it may not have any weight on the discussion. But it was a good try on the part of that person.

A lot has been said or at least everyone has it's own conspiracies as who is Satoshi is. But the man decided not to show his face but his legacy.

[Marvelman]

Here goes. Its a link in a link
/snip/

SORRY - YOUR IP ADDRESS xx.xx.xx.x HAS BEEN BANNED FROM VIEWING THIS WEBSITE

What kind of "conspiracy forum" is so stupid it doesn't allow you to use TOR nodes?
After my first attempt at visiting your site, I am no longer interested in your links. Besides, I seriously doubt that Satoshi ever actually posted anything there.