Why Must it be the last game?

[wxa7115]

Well with a bigger multi bet.. your odds payment are much bigger... so I bet multiple different selections at the end to cover most of the probable outcomes. I know this will reduce the payout amount, but a win is better than nothing at all....

This strategy did not work very well with the Soccer World Cup, because there were simply too many upsets. I did manage to win some configurations at the end, but that did not make up for all my losses.  

And that was to be expected, if the only thing required to become profitable was to do that then casinos would go bankrupt due to their players beating them over and over again with this strategy.

Personally I avoid parlays precisely to avoid the frustration described by the OP, as it can be very exasperating to win several bets in a row and then lose everything because you failed to predict a single outcome accurately, so it is better to take single bets, that way even if you happen to lose once you can still receive the profits from the rest of outcomes you predicted correctly.

[klidex]

The option to cash out is not always available, especially if the game has already begun. So if you want to make the most of your winnings you better cash out early.

It all depends on the betting company you used in staking the game, I have seen a cash-out option in a match that is ongoing though the amount that was given was small compared to my expectation but is always available if the game was played online and in some other cases where the cash-out option is not available it could be that the option you chose in placing your bet is going through the wrong direction so the advantage of winning the bet is slim in this case you won't be given cash out this is because they have seen that the game has high chances of not turning out well.

If you want to do cash-out, you have to wait until the amount of money there is greater than the money you used to place the bet so you can still get a profit, even if it's not much. But usually, many gamblers don't choose that option and keep waiting until the match is over. And if the result of that game is they win, they will take the money and vice versa. So it will depend on how each gambler will choose it but choosing the cash-out option can be a good choice when we don't know who will win or things will turn around.

It seems that every gambler has a different betting strategy and emotional level, of course.
Maybe we prefer to do cash-out when we have got some amount of profit and to minimize defeat or loss of betting money when things turn around.
However, it is in stark contrast to those gamblers who really have a high desire to be able to win a bet as a whole or as a whole.
In fact, they don't really think about the risks that will be experienced when the circumstances of a game turn around.

Every gambler must have their own betting strategy because they know that having each strategy can provide opportunities for them to win. And if the conditions allow for cash-outs, we better take advantage of them, especially if the game's conditions become unpredictable as to who will win or lose. Gamblers who are eager to win will not take temporary money because the amount is not what they expected, so they prefer to wait until the game is over. And they also understand the risks and are ready to accept those risks.

Yes, that's right, and I think it looks like the core points of your opinion are the same as what I meant in my review above.
And this is what actually happens, even I often do it myself. Almost every time I meet friends who are also fans of gambling or betting, it is only defeats and defeats that they talk about.
But whatever power I can only give the best advice, sometimes I get answers that don't suit me.

[Slow death]

Well with a bigger multi bet.. your odds payment are much bigger... so I bet multiple different selections at the end to cover most of the probable outcomes. I know this will reduce the payout amount, but a win is better than nothing at all....

This strategy did not work very well with the Soccer World Cup, because there were simply too many upsets. I did manage to win some configurations at the end, but that did not make up for all my losses.  

And that was to be expected, if the only thing required to become profitable was to do that then casinos would go bankrupt due to their players beating them over and over again with this strategy.

Personally I avoid parlays precisely to avoid the frustration described by the OP, as it can be very exasperating to win several bets in a row and then lose everything because you failed to predict a single outcome accurately, so it is better to take single bets, that way even if you happen to lose once you can still receive the profits from the rest of outcomes you predicted correctly.

I also think that way, that single bets are less risky, but the problem is that in the long run they are not very profitable, let's see that if a person bets on a game with odds of @1.60, and then loses that bet , then goes back to betting on a game with odds of @1.70, loses the bet again, then goes back to betting on a game with odds of @1.80 hits the bet, that person will still be at a loss, will need to hit many games with those odds of @1.80 at least if you want to make some profit

now let's go to the multibet bets that I also consider very risky, if a person makes a multibet bet with a parlay of 3 teams and the odd stays at @4.00 then that person loses a bet, then that bet in another multibet and with odds of @4.00 and loses a bet, but then that person bets on another multibet with an odd of @4.00 and the bet is right, so that person is already in profit and it is enough that the next multibet with an odd of @4.00 is right and there will still be room to place more bets, of course this implies that the person always makes bets with the same amount of money

also the person needs to know well the teams in which he will place in the parlay and never think that he can always win, in games of chance the only way to profit is even making multibet bets and counting on luck in that case, because simple bets, however much the person keeps getting it right, it is enough to have a few losing streaks for the person to be at a loss and everything gets worse because it is very difficult to find games that have good odds, so if the person makes single bets they will have odds of @1.50. or you'll have to go to the BTTS market which has odds of @1.60 and above in most cases, in the over market I don't see very high odds either in most cases. maybe even in the under goals market there is but it is another market that is very difficult to predict

[Betwrong]

~
now let's go to the multibet bets that I also consider very risky, if a person makes a multibet bet with a parlay of 3 teams and the odd stays at @4.00 then that person loses a bet, then that bet in another multibet and with odds of @4.00 and loses a bet, but then that person bets on another multibet with an odd of @4.00 and the bet is right, so that person is already in profit and it is enough that the next multibet with an odd of @4.00 is right and there will still be room to place more bets, of course this implies that the person always makes bets with the same amount of money
~

This is exactly why I have switched to multibets several months ago. You win one of them and all your previous losses are covered, or, you can even be in a decent profit if it's a 20x win. Another attractive for me thing about multibets is the possibility of cashing out before all the games are played. Just like today I cashed out 3x of my bet



and it was a cashout. With a single bet, 3x is something not that easy to achieve, right?