here is a little example using LN stats of the LN suck rate.. oops success rate
[image]
Thank you for once again demonstrating your uncontrollable talent for presenting absurd and unreasonable metrics by which to judge things.
funny thing is i actually used
the AVERAGE numbers of LN stats.., no exaggeration, nor worse case.. instead it was average/expected case.. from stats gathered from LN stats themselves.... and yet LN still doesnt shine or meet the promises you lot proclaimed it wold for the lasy (yawn) 7 years..
shame you didnt check that the stats i shown were actually from your own networks main stats page.. meaning its your groups stats.. not mine
Honestly, who in their right mind would use LN to send values in excess of $1000? It's not built for such purposes. Given that LN was never designed to handle large payments, an unbiased and non-malevolent person wouldn't claim that LN should have the liquidity to handle such transactions. But since you are totally biased and beyond malevolent, you continue to make a mockery of reason and sense.
you lot are advertising LN as the network people should use instead of bitcoin.. telling people bitcoin doesnt need to scale becasue every one can just use LN instead (facepalm)
yet LN cant and wont handle bitcoin utility at scale..
my point is people in BITCOIN want to transact more than LN's max expectation $700 total per session(far less per payment).. which your silly network cannot even dare be capable of handling, thus your silly network cannot handle bitcoiners use
so in short
STOP ADVERTISING YOUR SILLY NETWORK AS THE THING THAT BITCOINER SHOULD MOVE OVER TO
or wait several more years for the hope, dream or promise of utopian fantasy of being cable of
stop advertising that bitcoin doesnt need to scale because LN is the promise//future for bitcoiners to move to..
LN is not. so stop pretending it is.
especially now you have conceded to admit you now know LN cant cope
but thanks for making my point by you admitting now that your silly network cant handle even $1k per session let alone per paymentif i see you after this posts timestamp. trying yet again to advertise LN as the solution bitcoiners should use instead of the bitcoin network where you kept on saying it is the "solution to scaling".. please know i will be referring you back to this to remind you
oh by the way.. minimum wage in america is $10 for 40hours a week for 4 weeks
meaning people wanting to get paid or remit their salary to relatives ($1600) is not something LN can do..
yep LN is not even suitable for minimum wage earners of america.. let alone workers with skill and talent that get paid more
so dont try to find new trending topics of financial use-cases to pretend LN can handle. when you know and now admit its a small niche silly network with flaws and bugs. that doesnt meet its promises promoted by you lot years ago
LN failed that test when it tried with el salvador