but if he has a few BTC in his possession it is really not an important thing. Will it be news if we find out for a while that he sold BTC?
I totally agree.
Ten years ago this would have been a major news and will help put Bitcoin in the mainstream media, but fast forward to today it's just another lucky person who was able to get some bitcoins and possibly still hold them.
I will be willing to place a bet that if the personalities of all Bitcoin holders were public there would be a lot of eyebrow raising names on the list.
This is what I was going to post
or something similar.
What this news shows is that the "rich and famous" definitely and generally are
invested in Bitcoin to some extent. If the investment is on a private level they dont have
to make it public.
I definitely think if we knew just who and how many of the rich and famous own Bitcoin
it would be an eye-opener of sorts.
Realistically when anyone gets over the "volatility" issue and familiarises themselves
with how Bitcoin works and what it offers the volatility becomes irrelevant.