Russtie Beerkan (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 75
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 12, 2023, 08:15:43 PM |
|
I believe the [banned mixer] mixer is either a fake mixer or potentially even a scam. From examining transactions from their service it's easy to spot that their bitcoin configuration always sets bitcoin transaction fees below the network minimum. This is a very serious problem for a bitcoin mixer service as it creates two very serious issues: A. Drastically reduced anonimity. With a simple filter of transactions anyone with half a brain could identify transactions coming from YoMix. While their mixer is new, bitcoin transactions are forever. In short notice, mainstream services will see all their transactions and potentially even block you retroactively if you had ever touched coins related to YoMix. B. Reduced functionality. Setting fees wrong can result to your transaction getting stock for an indefinite amount of time. This uncertainty of course makes any transaction passing through YoMix pointless as it's uncertain if it will ever arrive to its intended final destination. This should have been the most basic functionality to program when creating a bitcoin mixer, but it just shows that yomix developers were really inexperienced in programming bitcoin. Moreover, YoMix is a bad mixer overall. Out of respect for what migh have been victims, I'll be deribelately vague with this just so whoever had sensitive transactions "mixed" by YoMix can have time to re-organize and disengage his finances from this ordeal (I'd personally recomend using just monero this time). But it all boils down to YoMix basically reuisng the same addresses over and over. This is a very bad practice for a mixer. This leads to situations where it's very easy for even a basic block explorer to group their addresses. For instance, here's a main family of addresses YoMix uses on walletexplorer: https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/2584d8142e542ff5Another thing that's very suspicious about YoMix's funding is the high proximity it has with Kraken.com. It's obvious that from every "mixing" transactions many of the feeding addresses are directly funded from Kraken. This normally would be a very bad practice and is something no real mixer does. This is actually evidence that YoMix might actually be a FED honey pot. Because of course a honeypot mixer would only have the purpose of de-anonymizing users instead of providing actual mixing services. Therefore the ones running it would look to get coins as fast and easy as possible and wouldn't mind withdrawing from an exchange account with full KYC. Anyway, I'd just recommend stepping away from YoMix and trying another way to hide your funds before it's too late. If you find that it's a honeypot via twitter or better yet through a sealed indictment it's already too late.
|
|
|
|
Faisal2202
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 12, 2023, 09:54:06 PM |
|
Yomix is a shady exchange, avoid such exchange.
If you are looking for a coin that you can invest with 10x or 100x daily profit, you can visit Yomix. But know that it is a scam. You will be given the 10x or 100x daily profit but the coin will fall significantly in a way that you will lose far more than the profit.
If you use bitcoin to buy their shit coin directly. Assuming you used $100 to buy it, they will make it work in a way that the amount of shitcoins that you bought may no longer worth $1.
If you want to mine, buy ASIC and join mining pool, instead of buying mining hash rates which you do not know if it is true or not. Everything about Yomix is more related to scam.
Exchange with gambling. Not trustworthy.
Do not trust cloud mining, they are fake and scam.
What are you saying dear, yomix is not a exchange I think you are confused here, as Yomix is a BTC mixer, which obfuscate transactions. I hope the yomix you are talking about is something else. For your convenience, Yomix is a BTC mixer, you can visit it, either by clicking the Sig below this post I am wearing or by visiting there ANN https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5432724.0I am just trying to clear this confusion of exchange, shitcoin, profit, loss, mining, ASIC idk (I don't know) what else you have just shed light on. And I have no comment for the OP right now. Maybe later I will share my opinion for you.
|
|
|
|
yahoo62278
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3710
Merit: 4499
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 12, 2023, 09:56:33 PM |
|
Yomix is a shady exchange, avoid such exchange.
If you are looking for a coin that you can invest with 10x or 100x daily profit, you can visit Yomix. But know that it is a scam. You will be given the 10x or 100x daily profit but the coin will fall significantly in a way that you will lose far more than the profit.
If you use bitcoin to buy their shit coin directly. Assuming you used $100 to buy it, they will make it work in a way that the amount of shitcoins that you bought may no longer worth $1.
If you want to mine, buy ASIC and join mining pool, instead of buying mining hash rates which you do not know if it is true or not. Everything about Yomix is more related to scam.
Exchange with gambling. Not trustworthy.
Do not trust cloud mining, they are fake and scam.
I think you might be referring to Yobit exchange. I am not sure if they are related, would be interesting if they are related because there are a lot of members promoting yomix currently. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5434037.0
|
..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀ ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄ █ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █ █ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌ █ ██████████ █ ▐ █ █ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █ █ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌ █ █▐ █ █ █▐▐▌ █ █▐█ ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄ ██ ▐█▌ ██ ████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████ ████████▄███████████▄████████ ███▀ █████████████ ▀███ ██ ███████████ ██ ▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀ ▀███████ ███████▀ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
PX-Z
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 12, 2023, 11:21:48 PM |
|
Interesting! Can anyone confirm this, and also about the kraken? I don't think anyone yet knows about this besides yours, can you give more supporting information. With a simple filter of transactions anyone with half a brain could identify transactions coming from YoMix.
Yomix is a bit unique because of their feature of sending random amount of transaction and using multiple of address, but if the wallet explorer is correct then this feature is quite useless. Setting fees wrong can result to your transaction getting stock for an indefinite amount of time. This uncertainty of course makes any transaction passing through YoMix pointless as it's uncertain if it will ever arrive to its intended final destination. This should have been the most basic functionality to program when creating a bitcoin mixer, but it just shows that yomix developers were really inexperienced in programming bitcoin
This is nonsense, most or even all existing bitcoin mixers uses the same dynamic fee options, yomix don't differ from the other mixers. With all of you mentioned the walletexplorer is the most concerning.
|
|
|
|
TryNinja
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2940
Merit: 7370
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 13, 2023, 01:33:55 AM |
|
A. Drastically reduced anonimity. With a simple filter of transactions anyone with half a brain could identify transactions coming from YoMix. While their mixer is new, bitcoin transactions are forever. In short notice, mainstream services will see all their transactions and potentially even block you retroactively if you had ever touched coins related to YoMix. -snip- But it all boils down to YoMix basically reuisng the same addresses over and over. This is a very bad practice for a mixer. This leads to situations where it's very easy for even a basic block explorer to group their addresses. For instance, here's a main family of addresses YoMix uses on walletexplorer: https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/2584d8142e542ff5The same could have been said about ChipMixer, even more since their chips were all known on-chain, but yet they became the number 1 mixer. Also, knowing you used a mixer =/= making mixing useless. Even if you say I used a mixer, what do I care if you can't connect the output with the input (pre-mix)? B. Reduced functionality. Setting fees wrong can result to your transaction getting stock for an indefinite amount of time. This uncertainty of course makes any transaction passing through YoMix pointless as it's uncertain if it will ever arrive to its intended final destination. This should have been the most basic functionality to program when creating a bitcoin mixer, but it just shows that yomix developers were really inexperienced in programming bitcoin.
Easily solvable with CPFP anyways. Moreover, YoMix is a bad mixer overall. Out of respect for what migh have been victims, I'll be deribelately vague with this just so whoever had sensitive transactions "mixed" by YoMix can have time to re-organize and disengage his finances from this ordeal (I'd personally recomend using just monero this time).
Vagueness = nonsense as far as I know, so this point can just be completely disregarded. Another thing that's very suspicious about YoMix's funding is the high proximity it has with Kraken.com. It's obvious that from every "mixing" transactions many of the feeding addresses are directly funded from Kraken. This normally would be a very bad practice and is something no real mixer does. This is actually evidence that YoMix might actually be a FED honey pot.
Scrambling coins, getting new "brand new" coins through exchanges = directly connected to the exchange = FED connected? Also nonsense. Note: I have never used YoMix and have never joined their signature campaign, talked with them, etc... your points just aren't that strong, IMO.
|
|
|
|
Husires
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1288
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 13, 2023, 03:38:11 AM |
|
A. Drastically reduced anonimity. With a simple filter of transactions anyone with half a brain could identify transactions coming from YoMix. While their mixer is new, bitcoin transactions are forever. In short notice, mainstream services will see all their transactions and potentially even block you retroactively if you had ever touched coins related to YoMix.
More than one mixing service was seized by law enforcement agencies in both the United States and the European Union. However, no retroactive decisions were made. Some users even deposited Bitcoin obtained from signature campaigns or used those mixers without the account being suspended. The arguments you cited are weak, and I noticed that since you logged in here you attacked that service, even though you have not published since 2018. Can you sign a message from this address 13sFVaYNrnguJywMQkQB2ypVCwHSH2s7mt I'm new to this, but here goes a try! ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- I am Russtie Beerkan from bctalk and it is currently 29/11/2015 12:19 am utc -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNATURE----- 13sFVaYNrnguJywMQkQB2ypVCwHSH2s7mt H5vTZzFTwhJkj7madIPfUbq7lMbaIzPYriQvwgPxZM9CSk7s3dI2cPJQuPhQbUiKlmq56Im1DUw32y3l4y6ezZ0= -----END BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----
How to verify? Thahks!
|
|
|
|
|
digaran
Copper Member
Hero Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 899
🖤😏
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 21, 2023, 12:28:11 PM |
|
You need to consider all mixing services as honeypot/ surveilled by the capitalists and their cabal. Once you regard them all as honeypot, you will move forward to the next level of questioning, which is :
Which one of the mixers provide a unique way of mixing that even if they were a honeypot, there would be no trace between you and your coins. I mean, isn't this exactly what Bitcoin did? Using a unique method to eliminate "trust", so when we are talking about mixers, you have to think about that. Otherwise you can't really trust any of them by default. We all saw what happened with chipmonkey, they kept everything on a drive.
|
🖤😏
|
|
|
Saint-loup
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2410
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 21, 2023, 09:39:09 PM |
|
Another thing that's very suspicious about YoMix's funding is the high proximity it has with Kraken.com. It's obvious that from every "mixing" transactions many of the feeding addresses are directly funded from Kraken. This normally would be a very bad practice and is something no real mixer does. This is actually evidence that YoMix might actually be a FED honey pot.
That's a bold accusation bro, how do you know the addresses they are using belong to Kraken? Where have you seen that? It would be weird for a mixing service to use custodial address from an exchange. If you have been able to see addresses belonging to Kraken using this service, how do you know it's not addresses from users who sent their funds right from the exchange or right to the exchange after mixing them? In addition it would be disappointing if Kraken was collaborating with FED by their own free will.
|
|
|
|
YoMix
Copper Member
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 29
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 23, 2023, 07:22:30 AM |
|
So much fake information in one thread, awesome. If ppl in this thread don't know why OP so angry, that's why: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5432724.msg62987027#msg62987027If you set scammer address as destination one in our service it's not problem of our service, we fully completed everything you expected us to do (provided LoG, received coins, mixed them, sent to the address you set). We don't change orders and don't broadcast RBF transactions. And yes, we have nothing to deal with kraken/etc, and we don't reuse our addresses obviously, it's easy to track for any experienced person (except OP, sadly he's experienced only in posting fake information). Walletexplorer URL also makes no sense at all, good you found 3 of kraken (or not, idk, anyway not belongs to us) addresses, but, and what? GL everyone, if someone still wants we can continue discussion in our service thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5432724Stay safe ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
|
xtests
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 44
Merit: 59
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 23, 2023, 01:10:30 PM |
|
...
It seems you are unable to follow up with responses in your own thread. The "scammer address as destination" issue doesn't even belong to OP as they have absolutely different issue related to a stuck transaction due to a low fee set by your service. The "scammer address as destination" issue you are trying to assign to Russtie Beerkan actually belongs to another user named brace the mace with the original reply here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5432724.msg62977921#msg62977921The original issue raised by OP ( Russtie Beerkan) belongs here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5432724.msg62978113#msg62978113 Are you able to recognize the difference in the usernames across the posts in your thread? I am not trying to defend the OP since they haven't provided any evidence yet, however, it's obvious that you are being unfair with your responses and your counter-accusations make me doubt about your competence and ability to run a mixer properly. That's a bold accusation bro, how do you know the addresses they are using belong to Kraken?
By checking them on Arkham Explorer, for example, or any other AML/Chain intelligence provider as there are plenty.
|
|
|
|
YoMix
Copper Member
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 29
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 23, 2023, 03:01:33 PM Last edit: October 23, 2023, 03:26:20 PM by YoMix |
|
...
It seems you are unable to follow up with responses in your own thread. The "scammer address as destination" issue doesn't even belong to OP as they have absolutely different issue related to a stuck transaction due to a low fee set by your service. The "scammer address as destination" issue you are trying to assign to Russtie Beerkan actually belongs to another user named brace the mace with the original reply here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5432724.msg62977921#msg62977921The original issue raised by OP ( Russtie Beerkan) belongs here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5432724.msg62978113#msg62978113 Are you able to recognize the difference in the usernames across the posts in your thread? I am not trying to defend the OP since they haven't provided any evidence yet, however, it's obvious that you are being unfair with your responses and your counter-accusations make me doubt about your competence and ability to run a mixer properly. That's a bold accusation bro, how do you know the addresses they are using belong to Kraken?
By checking them on Arkham Explorer, for example, or any other AML/Chain intelligence provider as there are plenty. A stunning clarification, but we perfectly see the difference in nicknames, and we were not mistaken when we addressed this problem to the OP. This is the same person, or a person’s friend with the wrong destination address problem. Firstly, they flooded our ticket system with RBF question (they asked to RBF low-fee transaction with different address), then, in the same hour, after got rejected, they began to write on the forum. But in general it even doesn't matter. Specifically in this topic, we see nothing but baseless accusations. The whole text is from the category: “There is nothing complicated to hack google, even the child knows this,” but of course this is complete nonsense. So much words like scam/honeypot/fake/etc (even in thread title) makes us think this topic especially created for search engines, it's obvious ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) . As for low mining fees we've answered in service announcement thread. In short: we're ready to help and accelerate transaction with partners mining pool, but not RBF it. OP asked to RBF with changed destination address. We remind that we're traditional mixer, and, if you're tracking your input address and see money gone to exchange it means other client wanted them to be there (same for receiving coins, if client sent them from kyc exchange to us), it doesn't mean we use exchange addresses ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) . And we don't reuse addresses as we said above, it's insecure and we never did it. When OP provides more information (if ever) we'll return back with answer personally to him, but for now good luck everyone and stay safe ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif) .
|
|
|
|
yhiaali3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1920
PredX - AI-Powered Prediction Market
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 24, 2023, 09:17:02 AM |
|
I have a transaction stuck with them for two days, nearly at the last positions of preference of mempools on most miner nodes. I kindly sent them a support ticket to ask for either a doublespend so they could increase the fee and have my transaction actually arrive, but they outright refused saying their platform isn't built for that.
Obviously, this is why you are really angry. since you have enough experience to discover all these weak points in YoMix mixer. Why did you use the mixer? Why didn't you discover all these flaws before using the service? If your transaction had not been stuck for two days, would you have written this topic? Of course, you have the right to demand a solution to your problem and demand compensation if you do not receive your transaction, but it is appropriate for you to attack the service and distort their reputation just because your transaction is stuck.
|
|
|
|
|