Guns should be given to those that can control it because anger can cause a man to use his gun and we all know the result which grave.
Consider some of the best people who can control guns the best... the military soldiers. They have been trained to shoot well, to protect each other, and to maintain their firearms better than almost anybody. But every now and again we hear about soldiers being killed by 'friendly fire'. They got killed by their own 'friends in the military by accident.
So, who is going to determine who is a good gun controller? If soldiers make mistakes, anybody can.
Who is going to enforce gun control, and how? If police try to enforce gun control without guns, they will be shot dead. If they use guns to enforce gun control, they are fighting the thing they are trying to enforce.
Could This Supreme Court Case End Government Overreach By Three-Letter Agencies?
https://www.activistpost.com/2023/12/could-this-supreme-court-case-end-government-overreach-by-three-letter-agencies.htmlWhat do fishing, Three Letter Agencies, and gun rights all have in common?
Well, thanks to a little-known case called Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, commercial fishing and gun rights are intrinsically tied together. The outcome of this case could change the legal landscape of the entire country when it comes to the ability of three-letter agencies such as ATF to make regulations.
To understand the scope and effect of the Raimondo case, we'll need to first look at two different things. The first is the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. The second is a legal principle called Chevron Deference.
Let's start with the Fishery Act, as that's the basis for this case.
[VIDEO INCLUDED]...