Well, this is not me trying to sound pessimistic but what if Rollbit is the one that is secretly paying other casino platforms to list the RLB token? Do you think the token will still gain as much attention in that future if Rollbit stops paying for the listings?
Inasmuch as both parties are generating profits by either the transaction fees and others from RLB token been listed on their respective casinos, what makes you think Rollbit is probably likely to stop?
(i.e assuming if what you said is true). Because judging from its forum performance over the best years, Rollbit is one casino which has built reputation, of which I'm sure most casinos will be pleased to collaborate with, hence, most times your observation is likely to be either false or true. Moreover, if the RLB token can be used as a requirement for staking/betting on games for its casino contest, it's likely to increase its adoption and used both within and off the casino.
You are right, and I agree with you, but understand that i was just assuming, and to be honest, in general terms, there is actually nothing wrong with Rollbit paying other casinos to list RLB token, atleast, they and other projects pay exchanges to list tokens, so I see no difference if they decide to pay other casinos to list RLB, in the end, it's also a good marketing for RLB and also creates not just more usecase, but also more on chain transactions for the token.
And like you rightly said, Rollbit is one of the trusted casinos on this forum, so I agree that it's also possible that they are collaborating with other casinos to make RLB accessible to more gamblers.
Anyways, which ever be the case doesn't really matter, they can do anything they want as long as it's something that adds more value to RLB, for the sake of its investors.
