[2024-03-24] EU Anti-Money Laundering Laws Ban Provision of Services ...

[chmod755]

EU Anti-Money Laundering Laws Ban Provision of Services for Anonymous Cryptocurrency Accounts

A new set of anti-money laundering laws passed by the EU has banned crypto asset service providers from servicing and providing custody to anonymous cryptocurrency accounts. The approved proposal for the “prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing” alleges these assets present “risks of misuse for criminal purposes.”

EU Toughens Laws Regarding Anonymous Cryptocurrency Accounts

The European Union (EU) has toughened its stance on anonymous cryptocurrency accounts and privacy-enhancing cryptocurrencies. The proposal for the “prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing,” approved by the European Parliament on March 19, bans cryptocurrency service providers from providing services and custody for “anonymous crypto asset accounts.”

As justification for this decision, the proposal states that the anonymous characteristics of crypto assets expose them “to risks of misuse for criminal purposes,” and that these “do not allow the traceability of crypto-asset transfers.” Consequently, using these makes identifying suspicious transactions that might pose risks for service providers difficult.

The document, which spans 329 pages, mentions anonymity-enhancing coins and accounts allowing for the anonymization or increased obfuscation of transactions among the elements that should be banned from interacting with crypto service providers. This hints at the exclusion of assets that have been anonymized through mixing protocols such as Tornado Cash, and also privacy coins such as monero.

These measures do not apply to hardware or software providers, and providers of unhosted wallets that do not have direct control of the crypto asset wallets of their users. The EU Council and the Parliament convened to apply these measures in December 2022.

Patrick Breyer, a member of the European Parliament since 2019 and part of Pirate Party Germany, voted against this proposal, explaining that it might have negative repercussions.

Breyer stated:

We have a right to pay and donate online without our personal transactions being recorded. If the EU believes it can regulate virtual currencies at a regional level, it hasn’t understood the global nature of the Internet.

Source: https://news.bitcoin.com/eu-anti-money-laundering-laws-ban-provision-of-services-for-anonymous-cryptocurrency-accounts/

[stompix]

Patrick Breyer, a member of the European Parliament since 2019 and part of Pirate Party Germany, voted against this proposal, explaining that it might have negative repercussions.

Breyer stated:

We have a right to pay and donate online without our personal transactions being recorded. If the EU believes it can regulate virtual currencies at a regional level, it hasn’t understood the global nature of the Internet.

Those guys are stuck in the Piratebay era.
For a guy who was supposed to know enough about crypto, economics, and regulations in the EU he should have understood the difference between personal payments and payments that are the result of a binding contract. You can be the rebel you want but if the guy that sells you a car takes only a bank transfer that's it, this is not about hiding your identity, it's about someone now servicing you without knowing your identity!

If that phrase is his best take on the issue no surprise he was the only one to vote against and couldn't convince anyone else to do so.

[cr1776]

Patrick Breyer, a member of the European Parliament since 2019 and part of Pirate Party Germany, voted against this proposal, explaining that it might have negative repercussions.

Breyer stated:

We have a right to pay and donate online without our personal transactions being recorded. If the EU believes it can regulate virtual currencies at a regional level, it hasn’t understood the global nature of the Internet.

Those guys are stuck in the Piratebay era.
For a guy who was supposed to know enough about crypto, economics, and regulations in the EU he should have understood the difference between personal payments and payments that are the result of a binding contract. You can be the rebel you want but if the guy that sells you a car takes only a bank transfer that's it, this is not about hiding your identity, it's about someone now servicing you without knowing your identity!

If that phrase is his best take on the issue no surprise he was the only one to vote against and couldn't convince anyone else to do so.

He is right though even if that wasn't perhaps his best take.  You should be able to send someone money without it being recorded by someone else.  Anonymity was important in the US in 1776 when they were fighting the British and is just as important today:  without being able to fund speech that someone might disagree with, you have little free speech.  

Look at the US where the President had payment processors shut off because the powers that be disagreed with him.  If it can happen to him, it can happen to anyone and everyone if they have an unpopular opinion.  

The EU is a surveillance state and no friend of liberty.