Will You Trade AI For Human Creativity?

[Kelward]

I think AI cannot beat human creativity and I believe there are many jobs that cannot be replaced by AI. AI creativity is determined by the humans who create it, in other words if you want to increase the creativity of AI you have to increase the creativity of the humans who make it. Is an AI project worth investing in? worthy, because there are many AI projects that have succeeded in hype and success.

You can't be faster than your shadow so in reality AI can not be more advanced than humans that created them. Without the humans that will be innovative to improve on the functionality of AI they'll just remain in the level of how they were programmed to function. Humans are born with natural brains to explore and experiment, never to remain stagnant, as technology is advancing, the human mind will always be ahead. I see AI taking over most of the workforce in the future just like machines in the industrial revolution took over laborers jobs, so humans will always find a way to survive and think ahead of any sofisticated gadgets.

As for any AI projects in the market DYOR and invest the amount that you can afford to loose because the crypto market is volatile.

[rodskee]

Hypothetically though, I believe AI can be a very useful tool for businesses particularly startups who can't afford to employ a specialist for every micro aspect of the business.

isn't ai more expensive than hiring an artist?

i mean artists are already underpaid and i am not saying they should continue to be underpaid but it seems like it is much cheaper to get an actual artist to do some of your works at least you know it will not create a piece that has some weird and questionable parts

I will however like to hear your thoughts (not ethically but practically) on "if AI can be trained to be creative and if it's creativity can surpass human spontaneity?" and are project like these worth investing in?

ai can't be creative because at the end of the day it is still humans feeding them what to make and ai can't reach the intricacies of a human's creativity.

maybe in the future ai could be much perfected and we will not see it creating an artwork or a portrait of someone with 11 fingers. but right now, it is very obvious that an artwork is not created by a human if you look at it which is not a good thing for ai tech as it shows how far it is from humans art

[betswift]

I know there is an age long dichotomy of AI and humans and how the use of AI will phase out many mundane human works. But it is evident that the time for that has not arrived yet.

Hypothetically though, I believe AI can be a very useful tool for businesses particularly startups who can't afford to employ a specialist for every micro aspect of the business. This came to mind when I saw what LinqAI was doing with some specific AI ML algorithm. LinqAI is a crypto project providing AI-powered solutions for businesses. As a developer I believe training AI to specialize in some mundane task will greatly benefit a lot of businesses.

I will however like to hear your thoughts (not ethically but practically) on "if AI can be trained to be creative and if it's creativity can surpass human spontaneity?" and are project like these worth investing in?

I agree with AI being more and more useful for mundane tasks, such as training systems for copywriting in the style needed and many other spheres, however, creativity is different. Of course, AI improves here too, but I don't think it can surpass us for now, because the tech is not yet there and we ourselves feed the AI with what it's capable of. Thus, I do think it's only a matter of time before AI will become advanced even for spheres where humans are irreplaceable.