This way you can't punish or have court over the person or they still can ?

[Waldorf77]

Interesting case:
a person cannot be punished if it is not possible to determine his exact identity because the court imposes punishment on a person who is in some register, so it is possible that the person will not be punished because you cannot punish a dog or a cat based on any law, this person is like an animal.
And If person don't cooperate to help officials ?
This makes the point that no other human can judge over the other human body but only over the corporation of that person and only If person gives the permission If person is not in the system it's impossible to judge over him.
You can't use the nickname or just made up info of person.
Does anyone knows what the law enforcement will do in this situation ?  
Or the law enforcment give the person new identity and add into register so they can legally deal with person and taking to the court ?
Does anyone have had experinces of this or knows ?

[BADecker]

US foundational law goes a step further than that.

In US law, a 'defendant' has the right to face his accuser in court. This means that he can require to face his actual accuse, not somebody representing his accuser. BUT HE HAS TO ASSERT HIS RIGHT.

When you face your accuser - the man or woman named on the indictment - you can require the harm or damage that you did be shown by your accuser, and the proof and witnesses that show it actually was you that did the harm and damage. If the accuser is a corporate entity, or other paper entity, it can not get on the stand and say anything. --- Note that the government is a paper entity. Virtually all the cases of THE STATE OF XXXXX or THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. anybody could have been thrown out if the defendant had firmly asserted his right to face his accuser.

None of the persons on the indictment are people. They all are paperwork... unless somebody says that he is the person named. He might be lying, but if nobody contradicts him, his statement of what he is will be accepted.

Take a look at the 4th amendment to the US Constitution. It says, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons..." What are their persons? To understand what a person is, and that you can have more than one person, see Office of the Person - https://redress4dummies.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/office-of-person1.pdf.

Wake up, you sheeple. You are being duped by government and others.





And don't screw yourself like Trump screwed himself. He was represented, and he agreed to it. Stand unrepresented so that the judge doesn't have the right or ability to gag you. He will be acting unConstitutionally if he doesn't allow you, an unrepresented man/woman to question your accuser on the stand.