-1 for Signature Campaigns for the Bitcointalk forum.

[Miles2006]

I'm out, there more all og's out! this forum was specified and intended to run for Bitcoin related topics (shit promotions along all days on each op's ad). What makes you think advertising such ponzis for individual personal lost who joins there after the forum trust?

I’m confused, honestly speaking I don’t get what the op is trying to pass out except from the fact op mentioned shit promotions, I’m totally speechless because all this sound as an insult personally you should take more advice if only you’ll return back else the first reply suit your mentality. When exactly did individuals start advertising ponzi project? Curious to know of course you can always make a report concerning any project you find offensive rather a scam project but this is not the right way to create a complaint.

[JollyGood]

He is probably annoyed that he can't get into one (or the one that he wants) so now he is venting a little bit and looking for attention.

He had his fun with this thread, I guess we will not see the OP again. He will probably go back to using his real account.

I’m confused, honestly speaking I don’t get what the op is trying to pass out except from the fact op mentioned shit promotions, I’m totally speechless because all this sound as an insult personally you should take more advice if only you’ll return back else the first reply suit your mentality. When exactly did individuals start advertising ponzi project? Curious to know of course you can always make a report concerning any project you find offensive rather a scam project but this is not the right way to create a complaint.

The OP seems to have created his John Doe account in order to protect his real account while at the same time to make comments about signature campaigns. His motivating factor is most probably because he was not selected to participate in one.

[Kemarit]

I'm out, there more all og's out! this forum was specified and intended to run for Bitcoin related topics (shit promotions along all days on each op's ad). What makes you think advertising such ponzis for individual personal lost who joins there after the forum trust?

But I still see some OG still here in the forum, with or without signature.

And there are a lot of good posters as well even with signature in their space. Perhaps those OG who never come back could have become rich already and ventured on other things or become involved in crypto that they don't have the time to log in here.

Before you forget those who are wearing signatures like gambling, if you are real OG, you know that one of the first use case of Bitcoin is gambling per se.

[GeorgeJohn]

I'm out, there more all og's out! this forum was specified and intended to run for Bitcoin related topics (shit promotions along all days on each op's ad). What makes you think advertising such ponzis for individual personal lost who joins there after the forum trust?

if you don't find signature campaigns attractive from your perspective, you ignore service board and altcoin board, in fact anything that has to do with promotion with payment just isolate yourself...don't know you that signature campaigns is among of things that brings traffic in the forum. worldofcoins has said it all just follow his advice.

No forum member with any decent level of respect says stuff like this from an alt, none. This post should be deleted honestly.

no, the post don't need to be delete because he or she made it's own intension to be known, so it's the best time for users of this forum to correct op, so that it will know some important of forum activities and also other people learn from it.

If time is not taken, this account might be alt that applied in the campaigns severally and managers fails to absorbed he or her in signature campaigns.

[mindrust]

Where did you get your Engrish lessons, from a butcher’s shop? Sig camps brought life to this forum. Because of dem camps, people are more eager to share their knowledge and wisdom. Every forum should follow the same principle imo. We content creators ain’t working for free anymoar. We have rights. We demand higher paychecks, better social security and working environments. Sig camp posters’ lives matter. Our union is too lazy to make these demands from the campaign managers but we ain’t goin silent motherfuger.

Trump should work on that issue to. I’ll write a letter to Elon about this. Stay tuned.

[NeuroticFish]

Come on, we all know that on the internet it's too easy to pretend.

I'd guess that OP is just somebody relatively new who had big hopes to get into campaigns and was constantly rejected because of poor quality posts.

This being said, this topic gets far more attention than it deserves.

[Etranger]

I don't understand at all why signature campaigns are such a controversial topic. Let those who want to participate, participate, and those who don't want to participate, not participate. Indeed, if you don't want to see signatures, you can do this in the forum profile settings or with an ad blocker. No one is forcing anyone to follow signature links! And even more so, advertising does not mean that a person needs to turn off his own brain and blindly believe and follow everything that this or that project offers.

[Alone055]

I don't understand at all why signature campaigns are such a controversial topic. Let those who want to participate, participate, and those who don't want to participate, not participate. Indeed, if you don't want to see signatures, you can do this in the forum profile settings or with an ad blocker. No one is forcing anyone to follow signature links! And even more so, advertising does not mean that a person needs to turn off his own brain and blindly believe and follow everything that this or that project offers.

It's a common phenomenon that when something becomes widespread, it automatically becomes controversial, mainly because those who create controversies about it are the ones who want attention since they know they are going to get that because of the fame the thing has got, which they are creating controversies about.

OP's case seeems to be the same to some extent. He probably had tried getting into a signature campaign himself. Still, he couldn't succeed, so he decided he would get some attention by trying to take the name of Signature campaigns by saying something negative. Even though he failed to get a signature campaign, he did get enough attention from all of us so his tactic actually worked.

[Etranger]

I don't understand at all why signature campaigns are such a controversial topic. Let those who want to participate, participate, and those who don't want to participate, not participate. Indeed, if you don't want to see signatures, you can do this in the forum profile settings or with an ad blocker. No one is forcing anyone to follow signature links! And even more so, advertising does not mean that a person needs to turn off his own brain and blindly believe and follow everything that this or that project offers.

It's a common phenomenon that when something becomes widespread, it automatically becomes controversial, mainly because those who create controversies about it are the ones who want attention since they know they are going to get that because of the fame the thing has got, which they are creating controversies about.

OP's case seeems to be the same to some extent. He probably had tried getting into a signature campaign himself. Still, he couldn't succeed, so he decided he would get some attention by trying to take the name of Signature campaigns by saying something negative. Even though he failed to get a signature campaign, he did get enough attention from all of us so his tactic actually worked.

OP is a newbie, he couldn't get into a signature campaign a priori. So I don't think his motivation for creating this topic is related to that, unless he's completely unfamiliar with the forum rules. In this topic he may have attracted attention, but it is unlikely to pay off for him in any way, because here the subscribers themselves discuss more than they answer directly to OP.