pakhitheboss bias

[pakhitheboss]

How is this member in DT network with so many inaccurate feedbacks?

BTW, define inaccurate feedback, I would like to hear what exactly prompted a troll and an alt to come up with this statement. I am not a DT1 so it does not matter if I leave a neutral tag and when I have already removed the neutral tag you keep on spamming the thread. Why are you not banned for spamming and trolling is now the question that comes to my mind.

Since you have questioned my feedback let me assure you I only give those when I find a troll, alts, or a spammer like you. And I am not someone who hides behind like you are doing as I am certain you are not happy with the neutral feedback that I gave you a few days back. Why I came to that conclusion because you again dragged a user into your replies on this thread with whom I agreed  

You have been again exposed!

Why don't you understand that this is the path to becoming a new JollyGood?
All he learned from user Mr. JollyGood. Since people are still trusting JollyGood's feedback, other members thinking of following him. This JollyGood user asked me why I had not posted in the last 14 months or why I posted only two posts. Who gave him the right to ask me? He is policing in the forum and he believes he is a God. Everyone loves power. Everyone wants to dominate others.

[Pmalek]

I am not a DT1 so it does not matter if I leave a neutral tag...

You don't have to be a DT1 member for your feedback to be visible for the general public. You are part of the DT2 network of users and that makes the trust ratings you write to others equally visible on the forum. Your feedback doesn't appear under the 'Untrusted feedback' section on the Trust page as it appears for users outside of the DT network. You have removed the feedback mentioned in the OP. Good call! Case closed!

[Wapfika]

Is it worth paying attention to such tags? Can't the one who will look at the OP's trust, having seen this tag, analyze the fairness of the tag himself? If we exchange such notes every time, it will turn into a kindergarten and childish quarrel.
The trust system was invented for other purposes.
On the other hand, anyone who is in a hurry to leave a tag for someone should carefully check all the evidence; otherwise, as yahoo62278 correctly says, there is no point in trusting the tags of the one who left them.

You’re right about this explanation. Mostly campaign managers will look on to this neutral tag when they are evaluating members for joining the campaign. Campaign managers is not dumb enough to consider this neutral tag as valid reason to reject someones application on a campaign.

Regardless, neutral tag is always easy to throw since doesn’t contribute to trust score so I always consider it as just a note rather than a rating.

[pakhitheboss]

Although I'm sure you're not new to this forum.

But, you raise a very valid point, I take a look on his old thread especially when he was new, but all of his thread in the first page weren't locked. I know that my old thread mostly not locked too, but I'm not someone who think old thread always need to be locked.

I think he has NPD, hence he always blame other person.

Yeah! You are correct with your analysis as a doctor of Psychology . You analyzed my issue with only my posting habit about Bitcoin and you came up with a remedy too This reply made me understand where this thread is going to be and how racist it is going to be. I am not what you think and you do not have any clue about me. BTW, you are now accusing me of a mental issue which I do not understand how you evaluated with only my replies or topics after reading the replies of a known troll. Are you the one hiding and forgot that you were hiding   behind a troll. I can only assume but your accusations are significant to me as I am hurt and have no sense left with me.

BTW, Thank you for such an incredible reply as Amphenomenon will now understand why he/she should have contacted me through DM. Please do not take anything I say as offensive as I have some shit shrink recommended disorder.

[JollyGood]

Why don't you understand that this is the path to becoming a new JollyGood?
All he learned from user Mr. JollyGood. Since people are still trusting JollyGood's feedback, other members thinking of following him. This JollyGood user asked me why I had not posted in the last 14 months or why I posted only two posts. Who gave him the right to ask me? He is policing in the forum and he believes he is a God. Everyone loves power. Everyone wants to dominate others.

Why not post from one of your more senior accounts? How many accounts do you have here?

I am going to remove the neutral tag from his profile but let this be a lesson that next time onward close your thread after your query is resolved or such a situation can happen to anyone. I do not have any personal grudge against the OP but I feel he could have sent me a DM rather than creating a thread and accusing me of biased behavior.

Now that you have removed the neutral tag, the OP should lock this thread. When I posted in that thread I initially thought it was new too, these things happen and it would have been better if the OP had sent you a PM first.

You have removed the feedback mentioned in the OP. Good call! Case closed!

As he has removed the neutral feedback after noticing his error with the date of that thread, I hope the OP locks the thread.

[pakhitheboss]

Now that you have removed the neutral tag, the OP should lock this thread. When I posted in that thread I initially thought it was new too, these things happen and it would have been better if the OP had sent you a PM first.

That is the issue here as @OP is not interested in locking this thread and wants me to go through all the troll accusations. I found one user who has now designated me as a mental patient with his reply and @OP has already accused me of being biased and had self-determined that I am against the Nigerian community with his reply in the old thread.

I now feel I have enough evidence to leave another neutral feedback but as I have said earlier I removed the neutral because of holydarkness as I believe he is someone I should respect no matter what is the situation. I will be answering these trolls and I am not going to leave myself in a situation where they can accuse me of anything. BTW, I am planning to do some more research as to how to leave feedback from them.

[yahoo62278]

I apologize for my delay in addressing the neutral tag I left on the Amphenomenon profile. At the time, I genuinely believed the question raised in that thread was legitimate. I was unaware that he had forgotten to close the thread and that it took him a few years to realize this after someone had either intentionally or unintentionally bumped it.

I am going to remove the neutral tag from his profile but let this be a lesson that next time onward close your thread after your query is resolved or such a situation can happen to anyone. I do not have any personal grudge against the OP but I feel he could have sent me a DM rather than creating a thread and accusing me of biased behavior.

EDIT:

Not trying to water down the situation, but I believe this is a minor issue rooted from a small and simple misunderstanding. The thread just accidentally fits to be misunderstood, with it being in the same month as we are right now and the date was close by. There were occasions where someone necromanced an old thread and I almost replied or halfway reading the thread, only to realize it's a years-old thread rather than a days-old.

I'll try to page pakhitheboss here and hopefully we can end this peacefully before the drama that we all can see started brewing right above me become a full blown grab-my-popcorn.

BTW, this reply is the reason why I am removing the neutral tag as I could have edited it and kept it because someone forgot to close a thread when he was a Member and realized when I tagged him after he became a Hero member.

I think the burden lies on you my friend. Yes he could have sent you a pm and yes he probably should have started with that route, but you screwed the pooch by not taking the time to look at timestamps. You saw a reply and decided to pounce. You also could have sent a pm I stead of instant tagging.


As far as locking his thread, go take a look around at how many threads never get locked. 99% of them don't get locked until it gets necrobumped and reported. Then a mod finally locks it, it's no excuse  IMO.

[DireWolfM14]

~

He was probably jealous of you for one reason or another, so grow a pair of balls and get over it.

This thread:
"A year ago someone was mean to me on the internets."



FFS, tell me, how many sleepless hours have you spent fretting about this for the last year?  Well, now you have someone else to worry about being mean to you; me!

Not because of your ethnicity, religion, or gender.  Not because of your rank, wanting a copper membership, nor because of wanting to be in signature campaigns.  It's because you started this fucking retarded thread!  If you lock it now, I won't have the opportunity to taunt you a second time.

[Amphenomenon]

As far as locking his thread, go take a look around at how many threads never get locked. 99% of them don't get locked until it gets necrobumped and reported. Then a mod finally locks it, it's no excuse  IMO.

Now I didn't locked the thread early enough though wasn't online to be honest, JollyGood and pakhitheboss are criticising the fact that this thread has not be locked while it hasn't been up to a day but ignore the fact that pakhitheboss didn't correct his wrong until like 6 days.

Anyway, no need to keep this thread opened by the way but it's funny how pakhitheboss is still trying to justify his actions saying if not for Holydarkness then he wouldn't have removed the tag, some people can really be hypocritical, and so I literally didn't see a reason to pm him.

~

He was probably jealous of you for one reason or another, so grow a pair of balls and get over it.

I don't really care but you see I wanted to bring out the fact that people like this trust rating should be taken with verification.