What if Satoshi Nakamoto was more than one person and didn't actually sign the first block, send the first transaction, as well as the block that was signed the same, but written backwards?
Now that Bitcoin isnt in danger, would it be bad if people found out more about the whole thing? Would touching the wallets cause investor panic?
Thank you for helping me understand the situation,
Well the first block was gensis block which means there was not a single signed block before it, it was the first one, therefore we can't really there is any block backwards, this was the first block, not signed, so we can't really say if Satoshi signed it but I think there was some statement written on it, if I am not wrong.
https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/block/0 here you can see in the technical data, the statement indicates the big dump in the finance occured in 2008 well it is surely written by the creator of BTC which is satoshi.
And if we say he actually is not a single person and are more then one person then I don't think that's true even, because Hal finney in one of his posts here on BTT said, he think Satoshi is some Japanese dude, so from that statement I can say he is one, as if a person has talked with satoshi, and said he is some Japanese dude, then we should beleive that he must be one dude and might be japanese. Why he said that, that's not so much clear to me.
