It's time to ask why we all in the world can't just work together? Exchange all

[Fullbear2222]

East or west it's time to ask why can't we all just work together?
Without issues without fight and without diversion?
We become so divided and all those wars and crisis takes a lot more money and resources then they are worthed.
So If one country have raw material can set the fair trade with other country.
We all have different talents skills by exchanging them we get perfect balance....are our leaders never think about it ?
All the nations are different and unique with strenght and weakness some nations do something good what others don't.
What is the issue that we all have to fight ? Instead of cooperation and harmony ?


Or perhaps could the diversions and fights are organised by them who got nothing to offer to the world no value and useful things others so for them it's useful just to keep chaos and diversion so their non usefulness will be not visible and they can steal and manipulate trough all this when world is in smoke and nobody don't see anything clearly that's when they do their secret moves that's their way to survive in the clear and good world they would't survive because crisis and issues are perfect envoirement for them - is that the issue what we have that world can't get peace and instead of diversion and fight everbody working together in fairness according their merits and skills and talents and contribution ?

[coupable]

In ancient civilizations, wars were waged to seize territory and exploit all its resources, including human resources. The division of land between civilizations, resembling private property, is what made the concept of war common and even normal. There are religions that legitimize war, such as among the Greeks; Zeus, the chief god, was the one who decided on war, according to the priestly belief of that age.

Today, with modern civilizations, we expect humans to abandon their evil instincts and evolve toward increasingly lessening the instinct for violence. An entire market for war has emerged, managed by arms and military equipment manufacturing companies. Currently, the global arms market is larger than the oil market. Even if there were a global will to end wars, these companies would not allow it. All they have to do is stir up trouble between any two parties, whether countries, militias, or even individuals, in order to sell their destructive products.

[franky1]

negotiations and diplomacy should always be the answer.. but then when those talks fail or break down. hostilities can then manifest. especially if there are radicalists involved in the debates

many times things turn from corporate take over talks /political trade deals. and end up in physical battles and wars due to radicalists starting trouble and then the other side defending themselves with equal force. which then escalates

sometimes the radicalist chaos can be quashed before escalation. EG imagine if the US tesla protest/riot/arsons escalated from the drama of elons involvement in republican government, but turned from just burning cars, to fighting the police, then escalating further to need the national guard whereby it escalated to a civil war of dem vs rep.
but now back to reality it never went that far and got quashed
atleast the tesla arsonist radicals got caught and every other dem radical realised the dems wont defend, continue funding them nor pardon them. so it didnt escalate

however when the radicals are funded and supported even when harm is caused. things can escalate. as seen in many other countries for many different reasons(mostly in regards to racism or displacement due to invaders(perceived or actual) or disagreement of government changes)
yes all disagreements "should" only be battled out using pens and paper at a negotiation table. but there is always a chance of some nutcase/cult/radical group that can escalate things

[Accardo]

After I must have read about the great crusade it occured to me why the world will never be in peace, could you imagine that because of this ancient battle that happened centuries ago, Osama bin laden striked on 9/11, people speculate that past wars create new conflicts today. History should also get questioned whether to be continued in school curriculum or not, as nobody would feel comfortable to hear that their community or state was distroyed by another clan, so, one day with the right facilities they could start a fresh fight on the opponents who fought them hundreds of years ago.

[Yokkattannee]

After I must have read about the great crusade it occured to me why the world will never be in peace, could you imagine that because of this ancient battle that happened centuries ago, Osama bin laden striked on 9/11, people speculate that past wars create new conflicts today. History should also get questioned whether to be continued in school curriculum or not, as nobody would feel comfortable to hear that their community or state was distroyed by another clan, so, one day with the right facilities they could start a fresh fight on the opponents who fought them hundreds of years ago.

So far, conflicts will continue to occur because each individual is too pushy about their desires, even though other people do not agree with it and judge it wrong because a sense of togetherness is very difficult to establish because each has their own ego, and the world will never be peaceful and battles will continue to occur because there is no difference between the past and the present because it is difficult to work together on a mindset that is always different.

[shield132]

OP what do you think, why do politicians fight to be in the government? It's not because of the salary that prime minister gets, it's because they want the power. When they have the power, they look at the world like a chessboard. They don't care about average citizens despite the fact that some of them grew up among them. When government has the power, they do lots of bad things behind the scenes but people notice this. In order to not lose the power, they create a bait for the community and wage a war inside the country (civil war) or outside the country, they create a fake dramas by arresting someone or by committing a serious crime through second hand. We all can work together but our the population of the planet, taken together, is not ready for that. If you check the history, we were always in wars and 21st century is the most peaceful century compared to any old time. We are slowly getting better but it takes time.

[franky1]

OP what do you think, why do politicians fight to be in the government? It's not because of the salary that prime minister gets, it's because they want the power. When they have the power, they look at the world like a chessboard.

in many cases its not about the salary to play the current game of chess(be PM) its to use the current game of chess to win the game for whomever(lobby group) bet the highest amount for a certain side to win. and collect a good golden prize at the end of the game (lucrative business deals with lobby group after being PM)

we even seen it happen in the bitcoin world
years ago a US regulator in NY state created the "bitcoin licence" which put hurdles in the way of businesses and citizens in NY state. and as soon as he implemented it. he resigned and then become a "consultant" to aid businesses into how to get the bitlicence and he milked businesses for the privilege to help them get passed the licence he put in their way

[Oluwa-btc]

I believe people tend not to work with each other based on many reasons of which one can be greed and thus the humans are one flexible personality that are exposed to a change, and we all have different mindset anbd we make decisions differently as well so this is why we are subjected to not working together, cause what seems to favour you won't favour me as well and people tend to be more selfish. Though there's a saying in the bible that can two walk together except they are in agreement? So there's more to togetherness that we need to know.