Roulette: Live Dealer or Not?

[YOSHIE]

And what is the reason why you choose it? Do you think you have a better chance of winning against them with you strategy?

If you talk about the roulette gambling in a direct dealer system and for me, it is clearly choosing RNG, even though the game is often called the "random number generator" or "random generation" using using RNG/in online casino technology but the approach can be said to be fair and can be verified.

Unlike the direct dealer, honestly I do not believe the roulette round when turning the wheels, you can say that each round is controlled or depends on the dealer, for that if compared to the roulette game directly with RNG I prefer RNG/engine.

[yahoo62278]

Recently, I'm in roll winning in roulette with a live dealer instead of machine based RNG games.

So I have to ask, specially for those roulette players here, which one do you prefer, a roulette game with a live dealer or a game that is base on machine and RNG? There is this kind of games wherein you are going to play against the machine in most provider of roulette like Evolution.

And what is the reason why you choose it? Do you think you have a better chance of winning against them with you strategy?

I used to play a lot of roulette and I have had good sessions on both types, live dealer and electronic. I prefer live for the interaction factor, but really there is no difference between the 2. Some will say electronic is rigged but casinos don't need to rig games.

[blomen]

i don't think there's a huge difference between the two. i believe the reason people who play live dealer roulette prefer it is because they feel safer. even though the casino has complete control when playing in a virtual casino, i think this seems a bit fairer. also, the fact that it's a live action might make people feel more comfortable.

other than that, i think the fully virtual version of roulette is more logical for trying out long-term roulette strategies, etc.

[crwth]

I agree with the other members that I would prefer live dealers because, in a way, it feels more trustworthy to have live interaction. It gives realism and a more social feeling.

I don't think there's a difference in what the results could give, but it's more fun when it is a real dealer. What I'm curious about is the game's speed. For live dealers, the speed would be different.

[KiaKia]

Roulette is actually fun with a real life player, that's even if you are more concern about having fun rather than making money, many online gamblers don't care because they are always after money.

If you are one of them then know this and accept peace, either you are playing with someone or you decide to play with the machine it doesn't make any difference, you are going to need luck to be a step ahead of the machine or the player.

Another good example is using sport bets to compare to casino games, since casino games are all about you and the machines and sports is about real life players why aren't you still always lucky with sport bets then? It's obvious that luck is everything with gambling.

[Smack That Ace]

everyhere the math is analogous, whether you go for  live or RNG.. you know the casino's edge still crop up from the wheel afaik european 2.7% where american 5.26%, it not crop up from the streamer, right ? ? if i tell about RNG or auto roulette then it runs faster so the hourly loss also increases faster, if i tell about physical then it is  slower, is more social & the wheels are still checked. there is another edge you know, you will find lower limit & rapid spin in RNG table so it gives you cool excitment... imo it is super cool if your bankroll is tiny. so you just have to choose the real vibe, if you preffer speed & clarity then go for RNG or if you preffer atmosphere & control then go for  live

Regards

duke

[Beparanf]

And what is the reason why you choose it? Do you think you have a better chance of winning against them with you strategy?

I rarely play roulette games but most of the time I play the live game from evolution gaming specifically lightning roulette due to the random huge multiplier that can boost profit to huge win.

I like live roulette because it offer much better roulette experience due to its real roulette game and different roulette version which the RNG based roulette only offer the classic roulette games.

RNG based roulette is perfect if you want to use it to accumulate wager because each round on that version has lower countdown compared to live games.

[fullfitlarry]

I agree with the other members that I would prefer live dealers because, in a way, it feels more trustworthy to have live interaction. It gives realism and a more social feeling.

I don't think there's a difference in what the results could give, but it's more fun when it is a real dealer. What I'm curious about is the game's speed. For live dealers, the speed would be different.

As far my experience goes, yes, I prefer to play live dealer in roulette. Specially in land base casinos? The experience is very different, so it's hard to compare online and offline. That's one thing that it makes this game random, the dealer could be one factor and makes it harder.

He or she can control the spin and if you think that you can cheat like knowing the speed, gonna be very hard as they might be taught by the casino itself to alter their every spins so it will be totally random.

[KTChampions]

Recently, I'm in roll winning in roulette with a live dealer instead of machine based RNG games.

So I have to ask, specially for those roulette players here, which one do you prefer, a roulette game with a live dealer or a game that is base on machine and RNG? There is this kind of games wherein you are going to play against the machine in most provider of roulette like Evolution.

And what is the reason why you choose it? Do you think you have a better chance of winning against them with you strategy?

I don't think there is a significant difference but I prefer live roulette. When I play roulette, it is naturally martingale, so purely psychologically it is pleasant for me to believe (although this is wrong) that a series of identical results (which will kill my deposit) in live will appear with a lower probability than if the results of the throws are generated by RNG. Although this method has its disadvantages, since the pause between throws is quite significant, when we play emulation, we can place bets much faster.

[m2017]

Recently, I'm in roll winning in roulette with a live dealer instead of machine based RNG games.

I believe this is due to luck (chance) and not because there was a live dealer at the roulette table.

So I have to ask, specially for those roulette players here, which one do you prefer, a roulette game with a live dealer or a game that is base on machine and RNG? There is this kind of games wherein you are going to play against the machine in most provider of roulette like Evolution.

For me, playing with a live dealer would be more attractive than playing against a "soulless" machine.

And what is the reason why you choose it? Do you think you have a better chance of winning against them with you strategy?

I don't think the odds are going to be better with a live dealer in roulette. Here's why. I've heard stories of experienced dealers being able to send the ball into the exact slot they want with a very high probability (casinos don't seem to encourage this). I can't say how likely this is, but if it is, the dealer can easily leave your bets in favor of the house.

[Crypto Library]

Recently, I'm in roll winning in roulette with a live dealer instead of machine based RNG games.

So I have to ask, specially for those roulette players here, which one do you prefer, a roulette game with a live dealer or a game that is base on machine and RNG? There is this kind of games wherein you are going to play against the machine in most provider of roulette like Evolution.

And what is the reason why you choose it? Do you think you have a better chance of winning against them with you strategy?

Maybe different people prefer machine-based random number generated games and some prefer live dealer games.
But everyone has to agree on one thing, and that is the outcome of the wager, because the outcome of both depends entirely on luck, no strategy is useful here.
So we cannot say that in the case of such games, any strategy will basically make us win more.

However, if I talk about my personal choice, then Roulette is more enjoyable for me in terms of live dealer, so I choose live dealer for these games, there is no other reason behind it.

[ralle14]

My pick is also the live dealer option because you can skip rounds, and the live experience is always more fun for me compared to the original version.

In terms of luck, it's a tie between the two as i've had my fair share of success on both original and live roulette.

Even then, i'd still go for live because I remember playing a different version of live roulette from Evolution where you get some of your bet back if it lands on green.

[o48o]

-cut-
And what is the reason why you choose it? Do you think you have a better chance of winning against them with you strategy?

I preferred live in the past, because i am old school and i enjoyed company and that felt legit. But back then i was drinking more when partying, and that tuned out the stress from the crowds.  And when i am stressed out i am more inclined to raise my bets to tune out the stress. These days i am more isolated, and i don't have a reason to drink while gambling online, so my self control is better and my money safer.

Technically i still see live roulette being fun, and i probably would try it if i was partying, and having only access to my cash in my pockets, and not my debit/credit card.

There's no other strategy involved, then being aware of my weaknesses and strengths while gambling.

[Porfirii]

-snip-

So I have to ask, specially for those roulette players here, which one do you prefer, a roulette game with a live dealer or a game that is base on machine and RNG?

Although I'm not what we could call a passionate roulette player, the few times I play I prefer live games with a human dealer, instead of just a machine based game.

And what is the reason why you choose it? Do you think you have a better chance of winning against them with you strategy?

No it has nothing to do with strategy in my case. It's simply that I like to see a human managing the event, and I also like to think that this person is making a living thanks to my choice.

But it's not something very rational, because I don't usually do the same with other games different from roulette, where I don't mind if there's a live dealer or not..

[Hispo]

Recently, I'm in roll winning in roulette with a live dealer instead of machine based RNG games.

So I have to ask, specially for those roulette players here, which one do you prefer, a roulette game with a live dealer or a game that is base on machine and RNG? There is this kind of games wherein you are going to play against the machine in most provider of roulette like Evolution.

And what is the reason why you choose it? Do you think you have a better chance of winning against them with you strategy?

It is not about having an strategy or anything like it, it is because people could believe there is fairer entropy being generated through the use of an actual roulette, instead of casinos relying on random number generators and electronic entropy.
Though, it is a matter of fact there have been historical instances of fraudulent casinos rigging physical roulettes in order to increase their edge against gamblers even further.

So it really does not matter whether one chooses to go with physical/live roulettes or Random number generators, actually I would dare to say the best option would be random number generators coupled with provably fairness.

[panjul07]

Recently, I'm in roll winning in roulette with a live dealer instead of machine based RNG games.

So I have to ask, specially for those roulette players here, which one do you prefer, a roulette game with a live dealer or a game that is base on machine and RNG? There is this kind of games wherein you are going to play against the machine in most provider of roulette like Evolution.

And what is the reason why you choose it? Do you think you have a better chance of winning against them with you strategy?

Although I'm not a roulette player but I played it few times in the past both with live dealer or the one with provably fair system.
Which one I prefer? The one with provably fair system because it is faster compared to roulette with dealer, I can play with auto betting system without placing bet in every single bet unlike roulette with live dealer which is slower.
Of course gamblers may have different preferences whether which type of roulette they want to play but I think this type of roulette has nothing to do with strategy.