Merit source monitor

[Edibit]

It started with Riginac111
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5562692.msg65934739#msg65934739

Three merit sources were involved Charles-Tim, Mia Chloe and SmartGold. I am suspecting the three of them is the reason I did more findings.

Charles-Tim sent merit to the topic Riginac111 posted, I think he may not be doing something bad
Mia Chole sent merit to the topic Riginac111 posted, I think he may not be doing something bad

SmartGold sent merit to Riginac111 post which was the last post on the thread, he omitted all posts by not seeing anyone to merit on the thread but he merit the last post https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5561825.msg65920884#msg65920884. His he not a merit source?

That is suspicious

I was not able to do more tracing for now is a lie but I clearly see what is going on but I will go to the main point next time

This is just a warning

Everything will be on Meta board next time and it will not be good at all.

[Doan9269]

Merit is given base on how you're well convinced of the quality in what you see someone posted, in your own eye, a post may not be a quality one and in mine, it could actually be, but if you have more tangible proofs to show beyond just this, I beseech you to drop more clear evidence, but with this am seeing, there's nothing of such, moreover, if you think you are much confident in this accusation, why don't you use your main account to post this, you're hiding and this shows you're bittered, maybe you increase how you post also with more quality contents to be able to attract anyone to merit you.