Why crypto iGaming still has a long way to go...

[efialtis]

Hi!

Can I ask for your contacts to clarify the circumstances and resolve this issue?
Thank you

Yours sincerely,
BetFury

You really should've noticed this problem earlier as it's over 1 year old.

If you are serious about contacting efialtis, you should try via btcgosu website or the Telegram channel as he's more active there.

Guess what, they never contacted us - not coming as a surprise, go figure

[UserU]

Guess what, they never contacted us - not coming as a surprise, go figure

Perhaps they saw you recently won the affiliate awards and realized how much they missed out on good leads then only realized their FU.

The day they and you posted seemed to coincide.

[efialtis]

Guess what, they never contacted us - not coming as a surprise, go figure

Perhaps they saw you recently won the affiliate awards and realized how much they missed out on good leads then only realized their FU.

The day they and you posted seemed to coincide.

Fwiw, with the Betfury-related search rankings we have had, they literally missed out on dozens of thousands...

[Shishir99]

Guess what, they never contacted us - not coming as a surprise, go figure

Hey efialtis, sorry for bumping your old thread. I came here from the negative feedback reference of icopress, which is kinda outdated right now. It seems you changed your own feedback and updated it with the latest information, but used your website article as a reference. Since you didn't update this thread, I assume icopress didn't notice your feedback while he was waiting for Betfury's response to change his feedback.

I don't know if it was discussed anywhere before. But I think it would be fair to update about your situation in this thread. Whoever followed this thread would know that your issues with them was solved. I saw the negative feedback on their profile a long time ago. But didn't know it was solved already.

[BetFury.com]

It's been a while here, but it can now be clearly confirmed that the matter has been resolved positively.
OP, efialtis's feedback confirms

efialtis

2023-10-04

Reference

Negative feedback removed, info here: https://www.btcgosu.com/blog/news/betfury-returns-to-btcgosu-a-renewed-partnership/

icopress's negative tag refers to this thread and the article on Medium that efialtis deleted.
There is also an announcement here that confirms that the partnership has been renewed https://www.btcgosu.com/blog/news/betfury-returns-to-btcgosu-a-renewed-partnership/

icopress, can we ask you to reconsider all the updated information and remove the negative tag?

thanks

[Shishir99]

icopress's negative tag refers to this thread and the article on Medium that efialtis deleted.
There is also an announcement here that confirms that the partnership has been renewed https://www.btcgosu.com/blog/news/betfury-returns-to-btcgosu-a-renewed-partnership/

icopress, can we ask you to reconsider all the updated information and remove the negative tag?

thanks

Finally, you paid some attention to it. I am not sure if icopress really uses a Telegram notification bot. The managers likely receive numerous notifications from various threads; it is possible that they may miss your reply. You should consider sending him a private message so he can review it. If he does not want to remove the feedback, that is a whole different thing. But make sure icopress knows that you are actually looking for his attention to this matter. I believe he will remove it as soon as he have some time to take a look. Good luck Betfury!

[BetFury.com]

bump this

We would really appreciate it if icopress would reconsider this case. @efialtis confirmed that it was solved, and a new deal was made. We think the red tag is an unfair penalty here.

It's been a while here, but it can now be clearly confirmed that the matter has been resolved positively.
OP, efialtis's feedback confirms

efialtis

2023-10-04

Reference

Negative feedback removed, info here: https://www.btcgosu.com/blog/news/betfury-returns-to-btcgosu-a-renewed-partnership/

icopress's negative tag refers to this thread and the article on Medium that efialtis deleted.
There is also an announcement here that confirms that the partnership has been renewed https://www.btcgosu.com/blog/news/betfury-returns-to-btcgosu-a-renewed-partnership/

icopress, can we ask you to reconsider all the updated information and remove the negative tag?

thanks

[MotoLM]

bump this

We would really appreciate it if icopress would reconsider this case. @efialtis confirmed that it was solved, and a new deal was made. We think the red tag is an unfair penalty here.

Did you send him a DM?

[Mahdirakib]

'icopress' name was mentioned several times in this thread. I had also asked 'efialtis' about this in BTCGOSU ANN thread, but 'efialtis' hadn't replied to my inquiries about this. I doubt that 'icopress' has missed to notice the updates of this situation. And I'm wondering why he hasn't revised his feedback yet. icopress had said this for the last time about this negative tag,

My opinion is reflected in the tag I left, and as stated earlier I will revise it if the BetFury rep replies in the appropriate thread (constructively and without arrogance). Efialtis is an extremely trusted member of this community and I have no reason not to trust his words, especially since the representative of BetFury confirmed the existence of agreements and an influx of deposits. At the moment, I see that the partnership agreement was violated, which entailed financial losses. In any case, I'm not the one who initiated the tag, and if Efialtis reconsiders his decision, then I probably should do the same.

'efialtis' has already resolved this issue a long time ago, and he has also handed over the ownership of BTCGOSU to other people recently. I hope 'icopress' will give a look into his left feedback at this time.

[examplens]

'icopress' name was mentioned several times in this thread. I had also asked 'efialtis' about this in BTCGOSU ANN thread, but 'efialtis' hadn't replied to my inquiries about this. I doubt that 'icopress' has missed to notice the updates of this situation. And I'm wondering why he hasn't revised his feedback yet. icopress had said this for the last time about this negative tag,

My opinion is reflected in the tag I left, and as stated earlier I will revise it if the BetFury rep replies in the appropriate thread (constructively and without arrogance). Efialtis is an extremely trusted member of this community and I have no reason not to trust his words, especially since the representative of BetFury confirmed the existence of agreements and an influx of deposits. At the moment, I see that the partnership agreement was violated, which entailed financial losses. In any case, I'm not the one who initiated the tag, and if Efialtis reconsiders his decision, then I probably should do the same.

'efialtis' has already resolved this issue a long time ago, and he has also handed over the ownership of BTCGOSU to other people recently. I hope 'icopress' will give a look into his left feedback at this time.

It seems that icopress negative tag is no longer current. Quite some time has passed since efialtis confirmed that it renewed the agreement with Betfury, and since there is no new update, it seems that the last positive agreement is still in effect.
DT members have a slightly greater responsibility for the accuracy of their feedback, especially when it is negative.